RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00784
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reentry (RE) code of 4I which denotes Serving on the Control
Roster be changed to RE code 3K.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He did not complete an ancillary training quiz on time; however,
it does not merit a Letter of Counseling. One Letter of Reprimand
does not merit remaining on the control roster.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal
letter and copies of his AF IMT 74, Record of Individual
Counseling and Letter of Reprimand.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 3 August 2004.
On 15 January 2006, the applicant received a referral Enlisted
Performance Report (EPR) which stated his conduct was
substandard, that he was continuously late, failed to obey orders
and his appearance was below standards.
On 17 January 2007, the applicant received another referral EPR,
which states that he received two Letters of Reprimand (LOR), was
placed on the Control Roster twice due to repeated unacceptable
conduct, had two failures-to-go, failure to obey orders and
failure to meet financial responsibilities.
On 15 March 2007, the applicant was released from active duty
under the Fiscal Year 2007 (FY07) Force Shaping Program. He was
furnished an honorable discharge certificate, with a narrative
reason of completion of required active service and assigned an
RE code of 4I. He was credited with 2 years, 7 months, and 13
days of active service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of
the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C and D.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSI recommends denial. DPSI states both the LOC and LOR
were processed under the provisions of AFI 36-2903, Unfavorable
Information File (UIF). Commanders, supervisors, and other
persons in authority can issue administrative counseling,
admonitions, and reprimands. These actions are intended to
improve, correct, and instruct subordinates. The applicant was
given three duty days upon receipt to submit rebuttal documents
for consideration by the initiator; however, he declined to make
written comments.
The complete DPSI evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the RE code of 4I is
the appropriate code based on his actions. There is no evidence
of error or injustice in his records and the applicant did not
submit any evidence to support a change. The applicant was
ineligible to reenlist because he was on the control roster and
separated under the FY07 Force Shaping Program.
The complete DPSOA evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 11 June 2010, for review and response within 30
days. As of this date, this office has received no response
(Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting
changes to the applicants RE code. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the
case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of
the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence the RE code of 4I was erroneously assigned or
inaccurately reflected the circumstances of his separation, we
find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application. In view of the above, and in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exist to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-00784 in Executive Session on 7 October 2010,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Feb 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSI, dated 6 Apr 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 11 May 10.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 11 Jun 10.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03715
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03715 INDEX CODE: 100.06, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive a reenlistment (RE) code that would enable her to reenlist in the Air Force or at least, in the Air National Guard (ANG) and that the following be removed from her record: 1. While she contends she received...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00574
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00574 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4I (serving on the Control Roster) be changed to allow him to reenter military service. On 10 Jul 06, he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), for failure to provide a proper family care plan. The applicant was discharged...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02430
However, if the applicant has evidence to show the effective date or the expiration date of the Control Roster action, the Board may consider changing the RE code. HQ AFPC/DPSOA’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant notes that the Control Roster would have expired by the time he was discharged. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOA, dated 4 Sep 07.
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-02051
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 10 Sep 97 as an airman basic (E-1) for a period of four years. The RE code of 4I is correct since the applicant was on the Control Roster at the time of his separation. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00461
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00461 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4I (Serving on the Control Roster) be changed to allow him to reenlist into military service. Accordingly, if the Board is not compelled to grant the relief he seeks, his record will be administratively corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01103
On 23 May 12, his supervisor signed the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not recommending him for reenlistment due to his duty performance and multiple disciplinary issues. On 14 May 12, his supervisor presented him with an AF IMT 1058, Unfavorable Information File Action, notifying him that he intended to place him on the control roster for his duty performance and multiple disciplinary...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01519
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01519 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) of 4I (Serving on Control Roster) and his separation code (SPD) of JFT (Physical Standards) be changed to waiverable codes. A medical board determined he was fit for service; however, he was discharged for failing his physical...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02151
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. While the applicant contends he does not know why he was issued an RE code of 4I, a personnel data RIP retrieved on 12 June 2014 indicates he was on the control roster at the time of his separation. As of this date, no response has been received by this...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01009
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01009 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4I (Serving on the Control Roster) be changed to 1M (Eligible to reenlist, secondterm or career airmen not yet considered under the SRP) or another code that would allow him to reenlist into military service. After a...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04397
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, indicates his narrative reason for separation as Reduction in Force and his RE code as 4D. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the military personnel records, are contained in the evaluations from the Air Force offices of primary responsibility at Exhibits C, D, E, and F. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of the applicants...