RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02233
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect he enlisted in the Air Force
on 1 Apr 10 vice 29 Mar 10.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His recruiter failed to disclose the Air Force Specialty Code
(AFSC) he enlisted in would qualify him for a bonus if he
enlisted after 1 Apr 10.
Enlistment after 1 Apr 10 would allow him to enter the Air Force
as an airman first class (E-3) and give him eligibility for the
six year, $15,000 enlistment bonus. If the aforementioned
information was made available to him, he would have enlisted on
1 Apr 10 instead of 29 Mar 10.
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of DD
Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the
United States; Bonus AFSC Lists, and an electronic communiqué.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve, for a six year
period on 29 Mar 09 as an airman (E-1) in AFSC 2A752
(Nondestructive Inspection).
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/A1K recommends denial. A1K states enlistment bonus
entitlement is determined by eligible AFSCs on the actual date
of enlistment. On 29 Mar 10, the applicant enlisted in AFSC
2A752 for six years. During the time of his enlistment, AFSC
2A752 was not authorized an incentive. The applicant did not
provide documentation to substantiate miscounseling or any other
documentation to warrant special consideration.
The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 19 Jan 11 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit C).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application
in Executive Session on 28 Feb 12, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2011-02233:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Mar 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 18 Nov 11.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Jan 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 05680
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05680 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date in rank (DOR) to the grade of airman first class (A1C/E-3) be changed to reflect his date of enlistment (DOE). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02811
The commander was told that since the applicant was a ten year First Sergeant who did not hold a 9- skill level she could not remain a CMSgt and that there was not a method for First Sergeants to be promoted to CMSgt. A complete copy of the rebuttal is at Exhibit F. ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicantÂ’s MILPDS record was reviewed and noted as follows: 16 Jan 03, member last held AFSC 2A671; 17 Jan 03, member was selected into a SDI 8F000 (First Sergeant); 1 Mar 11,...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01618
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01618 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show he is eligible for an enlistment bonus, as of the date he earned his General Education Development (GED) certificate. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01665
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Per AFI 36-2638, Air Force Reserve Enlisted Incentives, service members who wish to reenlist with an incentive must be within six months of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03171
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his enlistment, he was advised that he would be enlisting as an E-3 (airman first class) under the Stripes for Unit Bonus Skills. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04469
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04469 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be paid $20,000.00 bonus over the course of 3 years as stated in his agreement. At the time of his enlistment, the applicant was eligible for the $7,500.00 bonus for his 3 year enlistment. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01117
Prior to departing for his deployment in Jan 2011, the applicant was on the extension which provided sufficient retainability for his deployment. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's Air Force records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00301
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00301 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her promotion effective date (PED) to the grade of airman (E-2) be changed to 21 Mar 11. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03396
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He should be entitled to a Reserve Officer Affiliation Bonus since his Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 64PX/Contracting, was listed on the 13 Jan 12, Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) Fiscal Year 2012 (FY12) Critical Skills Officer Incentive Eligible Skills memo. AFRC/AlKP appears to have interpreted Title 37 USC Section 308j in a manner that allowed them to add a caveat to the Commander's program...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01639
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are included at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/A1K recommends approval, indicating there is evidence of an error or injustice. Individuals must meet the following criteria for promotion to Airman, have six months time in grade (TIG) after entering Initial Active Duty Training (IADT) and to be eligible for promotion...