Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01205
Original file (BC-2011-01205.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01205 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an 
honorable discharge; or entry level separation without 
characterization of service) be changed to a code that would 
allow him to reenlist. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was under the impression from his recruiter that he had a 
guaranteed job as a Fire Fighter; however, during basic training 
he was given medical technician as a career field. He failed the 
national registry and was discharged. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant submits documents 
extracted from his military personnel records. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 9 November 
2009. 

 

The applicant was notified by his commander on 14 May 2010 of his 
intent to recommend his discharge from the Air Force under the 
provisions of AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208. The specific reasons 
were the applicant’s failure to perform his assigned duties by 
not making satisfactory progress in the Aerospace Medical Service 
Apprentice Course. Specifically, he failed the National Registry 
Emergency Medical Technician written exam four times. As a 
result of these failures, he was disenrolled from the course. 
Prior to disenrollment he was washed back three times, he 
received 47 hours of additional instruction and counseling and he 
attended classes at the Wing Learning and Development Center. 

 

 

 

 


He was advised of his rights in this matter and after consulting 
with counsel he elected not to submit statements on his own 
behalf. In a legal review of the case file, the assistant staff 
judge advocate found the case legally sufficient and recommended 
discharge. The discharge authority concurred with the 
recommendation and directed an honorable discharge. The 
applicant was discharged on 28 May 2010. He served 6 months and 
20 days on active duty. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states RE code 2C is 
required per AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF, chapter 3, 
based on his involuntary discharge with honorable character of 
service and the applicant has failed to demonstrate any error or 
injustice. It is up to each military component’s recruiting 
services to determine what RE codes they will or will not waive. 

 

The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The applicant states he believes he was led astray by his 
recruiter. He desires to reenlist in the service. 

 

The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit F. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, the majority of the Board agrees 
with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force office 
of primary responsibility and adopts its rationale as the basis 
for its conclusion the applicant has failed to sustain his burden 
of proof of the existence of an error or injustice. Therefore, 
in the absence of evidence to the contrary, the majority of the 
Board finds no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in 
this application. 

 


_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or 
injustice and recommends the application be denied. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-01205 in Executive Session on 16 November 2011, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

By a majority vote, the Board recommended denial of the 
application. XXX voted to grant the applicant’s request 
but does not desire to submit a minority report. The following 
documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-
01205 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 November 2010, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 23 March 2011. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 21 April 2011. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 13 May 2011. 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02467

    Original file (BC-2011-02467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02467 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a code that would allow her to reenlist. The application was timely filed. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02933

    Original file (BC-2010-02933.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01872

    Original file (BC-2010-01872.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01872 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge or uncharacterized entry level separation) be changed to a code that will allow her to reenlist. The applicant was discharged with an honorable discharge for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04550

    Original file (BC-2011-04550.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04550 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed so he can re-enlist in any branch of the service. The remaining relevant facts...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04730

    Original file (BC-2011-04730.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-04730 in Executive Session on 15 May 2012, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Nov 11, w/atch. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 4 Jan 12. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Jan 12.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02097

    Original file (BC-2011-02097.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02097 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2C which denotes “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” and separation program designator (SPD) codes be changed so that she can serve again in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02884

    Original file (BC-2012-02884.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02884 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2C – Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service,” be changed to allow him to reenter the military. After the Assistant Staff Judge Advocate found the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00953

    Original file (BC-2011-00953.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00953 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His “2C” reentry (RE) code (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed. DPSOS states the applicant was discharged for unsatisfactory progress in training based upon...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02146

    Original file (BC-2011-02146.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02146 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a code that would allow him to reenlist. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04397

    Original file (BC-2012-04397.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 Apr 11, the legal office reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient and recommended discharge with an honorable discharge. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial noting the applicant has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice regarding his RE code. Based on the evidence of record, it appears the applicant’s honorable discharge for unsatisfactory performance was consistent with the...