RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04730
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an
honorable discharge; or entry level separation without
characterization of service) be changed to a code that would
enable her reenlistment.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Because of her RE code, she is unable to reenlist in the Air
Force or enlist in another branch of service.
She was an airman with very few bad marks on her record.
In support of the appeal, the applicant provides a copy of her
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant began her military service on 10 Aug 10 and was
promoted to airman (E-2) effective and with a date of rank (DOR)
of 10 Feb 11.
On 15 Apr 11, her commander notified her that he was initiating
administrative discharge proceedings against her for
unsatisfactory duty performance. The applicant acknowledged
receipt of the Letter of Notification (LON) and indicated that
she understood her right to consult counsel and submit
statements on her own behalf, but waived both. The reasons for
the action were that she failed to perform her assigned duties
by not making satisfactory progress in the Aerospace Medical
Service Apprentice (Phase 1) course. Specifically, she failed
the National Registry Emergency Medical Technician written exam
four times. Prior to her disenrollment, she received 55 hours
of additional instruction and counseling and attended additional
classes at the Wing Learning and Development Center. However,
all efforts failed to produce positive results.
On 18 Apr 11, the discharge action was found legally sufficient
and, on 26 Apr 11, she was honorably discharged for
Unsatisfactory Performance after serving for 8 months and
17 days of total active service.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA notes she was discharged only
after reasonable efforts at rehabilitation had been made. The
RE code 2C is required in accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, and she has not provided any evidence
of an error or injustice with regard to its assignation.
DPSOAs complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 13 Jan 12 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2011-04730 in Executive Session on 15 May 2012, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Nov 11, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 4 Jan 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Jan 12.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01216
The specific reason for this action was on 13 Sep 2004, the applicant was disenrolled from the Intelligence Operations Apprentice training course for academic reason. The applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice in the processing of her discharge warranting a change to her character of service, separation code or narrative reason for separation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02097
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02097 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2C which denotes Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service and separation program designator (SPD) codes be changed so that she can serve again in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00351
The four test failures were evidence of her lack of motivation. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: While it is true she was counseled multiple times for her failures, she would like to make it clear that her academic deficiencies are not because of her lack of motivation. She failed this course, but it does not mean she would fail out of every course of study in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02933
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02363
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02363 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty be corrected as follows: 1. DPSOS states, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the narrative reason for separation and...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03960
On 25 Sep 13, AFPC/DPSIRP notified the applicant that her request to change her surname was not possible because changes to former service members records are only permitted when there is evidence the data was erroneously recorded by the Air Force. The applicant has been disqualified for continued military service due to fitness failures and had a potentially disqualifying medical condition involving her left foot; both which could result in a 2C RE code. The AFBCMR Medical Consultants...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00521
On 21 Jun 11, the applicant’s commander notified her of his intent to recommend her discharge from the Air Force for unsatisfactory performance, specifically failure to progress in required military training. First, the RE code the applicant requests, R1, does not exist. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03080
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03080 INDEX CODE: 106.00 XXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed so she may reenlist in the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03631
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant entered the Air Force on 2 Nov 10. Her desire to reenter the military is noted, however, each component of the military decides what conditions and RE codes they will or will not accept for prior service members, which may change over time. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-03631 in...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01119
The applicant concurred with his supervisor’s recommendation and stated that he would rather separate from the Air Force instead of retraining. On 16 Jan 09, the applicant received a referral enlisted performance report (EPR), for violations of Article 86, UCMJ, failing to report to duty at the prescribed time and twice failing his CDC EOC exam. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2012-01119 in...