RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00067
INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.05
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code of 2X (Denied Reenlistment) be changed to
one that will allow him to reenter the military.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He served his country honorably for over eight years and would
like the opportunity to enlist in the Army Reserves. He was
allowed to separate in 2007 under the FY07 Rollback Program due
to having received an Article 15 which gave him an RE Code of
4H (Serving suspended punishment pursuant to Article 15). Had
he been allowed to complete his term of enlistment through 2012
his RE Code of 4H would have expired. While serving in the Air
Force he had all but one 5 Enlisted Performance Reports (EPRs).
He was selected as one of 50 Air Force personnel to complete the
Army Interrogation School and later deployed to Iraq for a year
using his newly acquired skill.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 3 Mar 99 and
was progressively promoted to the grade of senior airman (E-4),
having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank of
17 Jan 07. The applicant was involuntarily separated under the
FY07 Rollback Program. He received $10,314.00 in separation pay
and received a 2X RE Code.
According to his AF IMT 475, Education and Training Report, dated
15 Dec 05, he failed to return to training for the Enhanced
Analysis Interrogator Training Course; was in an unauthorized
leave status; and did not deploy due to not meeting deployment
standards.
The applicant received an Article 15 on 17 Jan 07 for being
derelict in the performance of his duties when he failed to limit
the use of his government travel card to official business and
for committing adultery.
The applicant received an honorable discharge on 1 Aug 07 after
serving 8 years, 4 months, and 29 days on active duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states the applicant was
non-selected for reenlistment by his commander on 15 Mar 07 which
established an RE Code of 2X. The Rollback Program utilizes
the Separation Program Designation (SPD) of LBK, more than 6
years of active service, with a corresponding narrative reason
for separation of Completion of Required Active Service since
the member is denied further continuation or reenlistment and as
in the applicants case; the DOS/ETS may be involuntary
accelerated. Members holding the 2X, along with other RE
Codes, were subject to discharge under the rollback program.
The DPSOS complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant could
not have volunteered to separate under the FY07 Rollback Program
because the program is involuntary. The applicant received
separation pay based on being in an involuntary separation
status. The applicant states he was one of the first 50
members to volunteer to complete the Army Interrogation School
and deploy to Iraq to use the skill learned; however, he did not
complete the program and was in an unauthorized leave status, and
he did not deploy. He received an RE Code of 2X as a result of
his commanders decision under the SRP not his Article 15.
The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 9 Jul 10 for review and comment within 30 days. As
of this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. The
applicants contentions are duly noted; however, we are not
persuaded that he has been the victim of an error or injustice.
At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are
furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service
and circumstances of their separation. After a thorough review of
the evidence of record, we find that given the circumstances
surrounding the applicants separation, the RE code issued was in
accordance with the appropriate directives. Therefore, we find no
basis upon which to recommend favorable action on this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2010-00067 in Executive Session on 9 Sep 10, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Dec 09, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 24 May 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 21 Jun 10
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Jul 10.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00752
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received an Article 15 and while he was on leave his commander received a notice to separate airmen with bad records under the Force Shaping program. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA states the applicant was not serving suspended punishment under Article 15, UCMJ at the time of his release. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03676
DPSOS notes the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice to warrant the requested change and his discharge, to include his characterization of service, was within the discharge authoritys discretion. DPSOA states the applicant was ineligible for reenlistment and was discharged under the Air Force Rollback Program with an honorable character of service on 15 Mar 07 after serving 10 months and 14 days on active duty. The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02654
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends changing the applicants RE code to 3K, due to the RE code 4H being erroneous. The applicant is requesting his RE code and SPD code be changed to allow him to reenlist in military service. However, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00707
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00707 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Article 15, nonjudicial punishment (NJP), and all actions associated with the punishment be removed; she be reinstated to active duty with her original date of rank; and her reentry (RE) code be changed to one that would allow her to return to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00835
On 31 May 11, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation Of Airmen, with a narrative reason of completion of required active service, a corresponding SPD code of JBK, and an RE code of 2X. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial, stating, in part, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the narrative...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01217
The DOS rollback program utilizes the Separation Program Designation (SPD) codeJBK (less than 6 years of active service) with a correspondingnarrative reason for separation of Completion of Required ActiveService because the member is denied further continuation or reenlistment and as in the applicants case, the DOS/ExpirationTerm of Service may be involuntarily accelerated. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel record, the discharge to include thecharacterization of...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00553
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She voluntarily separated from the military under the Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program and received an honorable discharge. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 April 2008. The Air Force office of primary responsibility (AFPC/DPSOA) notes that AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, provides commanders Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) selection or nonselection...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02577
DPSOS states the DOS rollback program utilizes the Separation Program Designator (SPD) code JBK (less than 6 years of active service) or LBK (more than 6 years of active service) with a corresponding narrative reason for separation of Completion of Required Active Service since the member is denied further continuation or reenlistment and as in the applicants case, the DOS/ETS may be involuntarily accelerated. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01987
In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of character reference letters, her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed Forces of the United States; letters recommendation, and extracts from her master personnel record. DPSOA states the applicants RE code of 4H is the only description applicable for members serving a suspended Article 15 punishment. We took...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01079
He believes there is no reason he should not be allowed to reenlist into another service component. DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 27 April 2007 for review and comment within 30 days. JAMES W. RUSSELL, III Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC [pic] Office Of The Assistant...