Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | 2010-00761
Original file (2010-00761.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2010-00761
            INDEX CODE:  107.00
      -     COUNSEL: NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect that  he  performed  temporary  duty  in
Thailand and Japan.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He served temporary duty (TDY) in Thailand in 1963, and his records  do  not
reflect any Foreign Service.

In support of the appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form  214,
Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air  Force  on  30  Oct  61,  and  was
progressively promoted to the grade of airman first class (E-4).  On 29  Oct
65, he was released from active duty for (Expiration  of  Term  of  Service)
with service characterized as honorable.  He served a  total  of  four years
of active service.

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States  Report  of  Transfer  or
Discharge, reflects no Foreign and or Sea Service.

On 18 Jun 10, AFPC/DPAPP notified the applicant that his military  personnel
records did not contain evidence to substantiate that  he  served  overseas.
He was asked to  check  his  personal  records  for  documentation  to  help
support his appeal, but has not responded to their request.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAPP recommends  denial.   DPAPP  states  a  thorough  review  of  the
applicant’s military  personnel  records  did  not  reveal  that  he  served
overseas.  A letter was sent to him requesting additional  information,  but
as of this date, he has not provided the requested information.

The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on  6  Aug
10, for review and comment within 30 days.  As of  this  date,  no  response
has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the  case;  however,  we  agree
with the opinion and recommendation of  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our  conclusion  the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.   Therefore,  in
the absence of evidence to the contrary,  we  find  no  basis  to  recommend
granting his request.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of a material error or injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2010-00761
in Executive Session on 14 Oct 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mrs. --------------, Panel Chair
      Mr. ---------------, Member
      Ms. ---------------, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 Feb 10, w/atch.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 23 Jul 10.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Aug 10.





      ---------------
      Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00761

    Original file (BC-2010-00761.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served temporary duty (TDY) in Thailand in 1963, and his records do not reflect any Foreign Service. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Aug 10, for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05218

    Original file (BC 2012 05218.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP states that the Board should review the applicant’s records to see if Foreign Service other than what they were able to verify can be determined. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that his AF Form 7, Airman Military Record reflects he was TDY from 28...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02870

    Original file (BC-2012-02870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the DVA denied his claim because he could not provide a copy of his TDY orders or any official verification that he ever deployed to Thailand during the Vietnam War. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 29 Oct 12, by letter, the applicant reiterates his original contentions. _________________________________________________________________ The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01791

    Original file (BC-2010-01791.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Based on the available master personnel record, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 2 Aug 54 for a period of 4 years. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, stating, in part, after a thorough review of the applicant’s personnel records, there was no mention of a TDY to Thailand in 1962 and the applicant did...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05154

    Original file (BC 2013 05154.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05154 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her spouse’s records be corrected to reflect his foreign service in Vietnam and award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03160

    Original file (BC 2013 03160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03160 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to show the following: 1. He served in Vietnam. The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04204

    Original file (BC-2010-04204.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04204 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive credit for his service in Vietnam. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of documents extracted from his military personnel records. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02942

    Original file (BC-2012-02942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02942 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he received the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for his service in Vietnam and Thailand. He spent over 20 total months in Thailand, Vietnam, and Okinawa in 1967, 1968, and 1969. The remaining relevant facts...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00760

    Original file (BC-2009-00760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00760 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States, Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect awards and decorations for his service in Vietnam. The complete HQ AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04261

    Original file (BC-2011-04261.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records be corrected to reflect he had “Boots on the ground” in Thailand (Administratively Resolved), Vietnam, and Laos. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterates that he served in Vietnam and Laos.