RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04764
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the
SRP) be changed to one that will allow him to reenter the
military.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He is currently completing his college degree and is attempting
to enlist in the Air National Guard. He would like to use his
skills and knowledge to better the U.S. defense. However, he and
his recruiter are not sure why he was coded with an RE code that
does not allow him to reenlist into the military. He would like
to give back to his country for all his country has given him.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty.
His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 5 Mar 97.
He received an honorable discharge on 4 Mar 01 after serving
4 years on active duty.
Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the
Air Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts
in this Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant was
separated after completing his 4 year enlistment; however, he
received an RE code of 2X making him ineligible to reenlist.
After a thorough review of the applicants record, DPSOA was
unable to find an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program
Consideration, non-selecting him for reenlistment; however, a
printout from the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS) dated
11 Dec 00 identified him as being non-selected for reenlistment.
DPSOA also found information in the applicants records to
support his reenlistment denial.
The DPSOA complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant responds by stating he separated from the Air Force
due to his grandmother becoming ill. As a civilian, he became a
police officer. Later, he decided to pursue a certification in
personal training that led him to go back to school to achieve a
degree as a Physical Therapy Assistant. Serving in the military
gave him the strength and confidence in himself to achieve these
goals. He acknowledges the fact he received an Article 15 in
1998; however, he admits he made a poor choice as a young man,
but has grown since that time and guarantees he has changed. He
did not receive any other black marks while serving in the
military and even joined the Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT)
team. He still does not know the reason for the coding on his
DD Form 214 and respectfully requests favorable consideration of
his application.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Based upon the
presumption of regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs
and without evidence to the contrary, we must assume that the
applicants discharge with accompanying RE code was proper and in
compliance with appropriate directives. Therefore, based on the
available eveidence of record, we find no basis upon which to
favorably consider this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2010-04764 in Executive Session on 7 Jun 11, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Dec 10, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 1 Feb 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Mar 11.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, undated.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01103
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. The applicant’s DD Form 214 is correct and she has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice to warrant the requested changes to her discharge...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00175
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00175 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to an RE code which will allow him to reenlist. On 1 Jul 11, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00175
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00175 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to an RE code which will allow him to reenlist. On 1 Jul 11, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00067
While serving in the Air Force he had all but one 5 Enlisted Performance Reports (EPRs). He received $10,314.00 in separation pay and received a 2X RE Code. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their separation.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02275
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02275 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03241
He has provided no evidence of an Air Force error or injustice. Absent persuasive evidence the applicant was denied rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2011-03241 in Executive Session on 1 Dec 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: ,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03037
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03037 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2X First-term, second term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed to allow reentry in the military. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02457
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, stating, in part, the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant a change in his RE code. However, his duty performance is the reason he was denied reenlistment, requiring a RE code 2X and his discharge under the Early Separation Program - Strength Reduction was not the reason for the RE code 2X. We find no evidence of error in...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03718
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03718 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st Term, 2nd Term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) be changed so he can reenter the military. On 14 Nov 11, the applicants commander did not select him for reenlistment under the Fiscal Year 2012 Date of Separation Rollback Program. The remaining...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03526
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03526 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code 4I which denotes Serving on Control Roster be changed to 3K which denotes Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or AFBCMR when no other reenlistment eligibility code applies or 3B which denotes 1st or 2nd term or career airman ineligible to reenlist. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served his...