Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04067
Original file (BC-2010-04067.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04067 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be updated to reflect his foreign service. 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Discharge or Release from Active 
Duty, does not reflect his foreign service in the Persian Gulf. 
In Aug 90, he was sent TDY from the 2nd Mobile Aerial Port 
Squadron, Little Rock AFB, AR; however, he does not have copies 
of his TDY orders. He contacted the National Personnel Records 
Center requesting his personnel file, but was unsuccessful. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in 
this Record of Proceedings. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. DPAPP states the applicant’s 
personnel records did not reveal any information that reflects he 
served in Operation DESERT SHIELD/STORM. DPAPP sent the 
applicant a letter requesting him to provide any documents that 
substantiate his foreign service time; however, he has not 
responded. 

 

 

 


The DPAPP complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 
28 Jan 11 for review and response. As of this date, no response 
has been received by this office (Exhibit D). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After careful 
consideration of the applicant's request and the available 
evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or 
injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions 
stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence 
of record and have not been adequately rebutted by applicant. 
Absent persuasive evidence the applicant was denied rights to 
which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or 
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to 
disturb the existing record. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-04067 in Executive Session on 24 Mar 11, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 


 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

 

The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2010—
04067 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 17 Oct 10, w/atch. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 11 Jan 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 28 Jan 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00181

    Original file (BC-2010-00181.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 and his Air Force Form 7, Airman Military Record, does not reflect any foreign service. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 June 2010 for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00160

    Original file (BC-2011-00160.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP is unable to confirm the applicant spent any time in Vietnam based on his Master Personnel Records. However, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant’s records do not reflect he spent time in Vietnam. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04365

    Original file (BC-2010-04365.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04365 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he served in Vietnam and the Philippines (Philippines service administratively corrected). However, the DD Forms 1351-2, Travel Voucher or Subvoucher, was illegible and requested the applicant provide a legible...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02202

    Original file (BC-2010-02202.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP further requested the applicant provide official documentation, such as, travel vouchers, evaluation reports and letters of evaluation to substantiate his Foreign Service in Spain, France and Libya. DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s military personnel records do not reflect he served in Spain or Libya. After a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the evidence of record his entitlement to Foreign Service credit for serving in Vietnam and the Philippines...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04204

    Original file (BC-2010-04204.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04204 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive credit for his service in Vietnam. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of documents extracted from his military personnel records. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02674

    Original file (BC-2011-02674.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP cannot verify the applicant was TDY to Vietnam, nor verify that the author of the supporting statement provided with his submission was assigned with him at Clark AFB or in Vietnam. We note the comments of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03694

    Original file (BC-2010-03694.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 7 January 2011 for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit D). After a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of any service in Vietnam. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02595

    Original file (BC-2011-02595.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s master personnel records, are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04125

    Original file (BC-2011-04125.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VSM is awarded to all members of the U.S. Armed Forces serving at any time between 4 Jul 65 and 28 Mar 73, in Vietnam, its contiguous waters, or the airspace there-over, and in direct support of operations in Vietnam. While the applicant’s record indicates that he provided in-flight services to passengers/troops and he was credited foreign service for at least two extensive TDYs, and noting that he has provided two witnesses statements attesting to his service, after considering the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02132

    Original file (BC-2011-02132.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________ ______________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s military personnel records indicate that he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 25 Jan 1967 and was Honorably discharged on 14 Mar 1969, and that he served in the Philippines from 10 May 1968 – 10 Jun 1968. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s master personnel records, are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office...