RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03918
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) on his Officer
Selection Brief (OSB) be corrected to reflect K11M3K rather
than 11M3K, effective 1 Jan 05; and that his corrected record
receive Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for
promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel for the Calendar
Year 2010A (CY10A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board
(CSB).
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The K prefix signifies that he is an instructor pilot, a
qualification which is only held by 21 percent of pilots. The
error on the OSB is unjust because it does not properly reflect
his timely professional development as an aviator.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his
OSB for the CY10A CSB; a copy of his Officer Performance Report,
closing 11 Nov 05 and other supporting documents.
The applicant complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was promoted to the grade of major with an
effective date and Date of Rank (DOR) of 1 May 2006. He was
considered and nonselected by the CY10A Lieutenant Colonel CSB,
which convened on 8 March 2010.
The applicants OPR profile of the last ten reports follows:
PERIOD ENDING OVERALL EVALUATION
27 Mar 02 Training Report (TR)
11 Nov 02 Meet Standards (MS)
27 Jun 03 TR
11 Nov 03 MS
11 Nov 04 MS
11 Nov 05 MS
11 Nov 06 MS
11 Nov 07 MS
11 Nov 08 MS
#01 Nov 09 MS
# Top report at the time he was considered and nonselected for
promotion by the CY10A Lieutenant Colonel CSB.
AFPC/DPAOM2 has administratively corrected the applicants
record in the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS) to reflect
the K prefix.
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPAOM2 recommends the applicants record be considered by
SSB. They note the absence of the K prefix on the AFSC, in
the applicants duty history, does not accurately represent the
timing of his Instructor Pilot upgrade qualification.
The complete AFPC/DPAOM2 evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOO recommends denial, stating, in part, the applicant
did not exercise reasonable diligence to ensure the data in the
Assignment History section was correct prior to the convening of
the board.
They note, although the OSB may have contained a DAFSC error in
the assignment history section, his respective OPRs communicated
to the promotion board members the correct information
The complete AFPC/DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 17 Dec 10 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit E).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case. While we note the comments of the functional manager;
we are in agreement with the opinion and recommendation of the
Chief, Officer Promotions and Appointments Branch, noting that
while the OSB may have contained a DAFSC error in the assignment
history section, the applicants OPRs communicated to the
promotion board members the correct information. Therefore, the
corrected duty history data would not introduce any new
information that was not already considered by board members.
In addition, the error could have been corrected had the
applicant carefully reviewed his officer pre-selection brief
(OPB) prior to the board as directed in the instructions
provided to each eligible officer before the convening of the
CSB. Consequently, we believe that he failed to exercise
reasonable diligence in not discovering the error regarding his
duty history prior to the convening of the board. In view of
this and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-03918 in Executive Session on 19 July 2011, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Oct 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAOM2, dated 21 Oct 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOO, dated 16 Nov 10.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Dec 10.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00293
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request to correct his DAFSC on his P0510A PRF. He requests his record be corrected with the Section Commander duty title and a C prefix added to his DAFSC, followed by SSB consideration. Therefore, we are convinced that both...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04279
DPSID states there is no evidence the original evaluation was inaccurate at the time it was completed nor is there any evidence that an injustice occurred. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPAOO5 does not provide a recommendation. The complete DPSOO evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 9 Aug 11, for...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03853
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004- 03853 INDEX CODE 131.01 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 19 Jun 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Brief (OSB) for the Calendar Year 2004B (CY04B) Lieutenant Colonel (LTC) Central Selection Board (CSB) include his current duty entry, “1 Jul 03 - Mil Dep & Subscale Tgts...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01266
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-01266 02-02454 INDEX CODE: 100.05, 131.01 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) effective 20 June 1999 be changed from “16F4A” to “P16F4AW” on his officer selection brief (OSB); his duty title effective 1 April 1995 be changed...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02454
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-01266 02-02454 INDEX CODE: 100.05, 131.01 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) effective 20 June 1999 be changed from “16F4A” to “P16F4AW” on his officer selection brief (OSB); his duty title effective 1 April 1995 be changed...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00740
The complete DPALL evaluations, dated 15 May 2013 and 27 March 2013, are at Exhibits C and D. AFPC/DPSID defers to the Air Force Decoration Board on whether the applicants actions merit award of the MSM, 2 OLC. f. Providing his corrected record, to include the PRF reflecting an overall promotion recommendation of DP, promotion consideration by an SSB for the CY10A Lt Col CSB. d. He be awarded the MSM, 2 OLC, for meritorious service during the period from 25 November 2008 to 30 November...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04015
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04015 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 2010A (CY10A) Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Central Selection Board (CSB) with inclusion of his Officer Performance Report...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00973
As such, the corrected duty history data does not introduce any new information that was not already considered by the board members. As a result, as noted, this oversight has generated concern regarding due diligence, which is also his concern. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a...
The AF Form 2096 is changing the applicant's DAFSC to include the ItKtt prefix and changing his duty title to read I1Assistant Operations Officer, both effective 8 May 1997. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 13 April 1998 for review and response within 30 days. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are not...
A complete copy of this Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. applicant contends that The Chief, Officer Promotion and Appointment Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPPO, states that the aeronautical/flying data reflected on his OSB is incorrect. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant's submission, we are not persuaded that hisofficer Selection Brief 4 (OSB), reviewed by the Calendar Year 1997C (CY97C) Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, should be corrected...