Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00954
Original file (BC-2010-00954.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00954 

 COUNSEL: NO 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

__________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

1. His Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 
26 January 2002 to 17 December 2003, be replaced by a corrected 
copy of the same OPR which shows the correct period of the report 
to be 17 December 2002 to 17 December 2003. (Administratively 
corrected with edit: Start date changed from 17 December 2002 to 
18 December 2002). 

 

2. His OPR rendered for the period 4 August 2002 to 17 December 
2002 be entered into his permanent record. (Administratively 
corrected with edit: Start date changed from 4 August 2002 to 
26 January 2002). 

 

3. He be given special consideration from the Developmental Team 
(DT) for Intermediate Developmental Education (IDE) in-residence 
credit based upon record corrections. 

 

__________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

An OPR with incorrect dates (26 January 2002 to 17 December 2003) 
was submitted for record, but the corrected and signed version was 
not. His OPR closing 17 December 2002 has been submitted twice, 
but does not reflect in his records. 

 

He believes his record was incorrectly scored for both the 
Calendar Year (CY) 2008 and CY 2009 IDE in-residence credit 
consideration, possibly preventing his selection for in-residence 
credit for his studies at the Naval Postgraduate School. He 
believes the omission of one OPR and the mistake made on the other 
OPR may have erroneously skewed the scoring of his record to be 
below the cutline for the IDE in-residence DT. 

 

In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal 
statement, with attachments; copies of the OPRs in question; 
records transmittal, and electronic communication. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

__________________________________________________________________ 


 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the 
grade of major (O-4) with a Total Active Federal Military Service 
Date and Total Active Federal Commissioned Service Date of 25 May 
1997. 

 

The remaining relevant facts extracted from the applicant service 
records are contained in the evaluations by the Air Force offices 
of primary responsibility at Exhibit B and C. 

 

__________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPAOC recommends denial. DPAOC states the applicant’s record 
was reviewed including the additional/corrected OPRs; however, his 
record does not meet the standard required by the Combat Air 
Force’s Development Team (CAF DT) to be considered for equivalency 
credit. 

 

The complete DPAOC evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

__________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 7 January 2011 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit 
D). As of this date, this office has received no response. 

 

__________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice in regard to 
the applicant’s request for equivalency credit. We note that the 
applicant’s request to have his OPRs closing 17 December 2002 and 
17 December 2003 corrected and made a matter of record has been 
administratively corrected by AFPC. We agree with these 
corrections. Therefore, we will only address his request for 
special consideration for IDE in-residence credit. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we note the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility has reviewed the applicant’s record for equivalency 


credit and has determined it does not meet the standard required 
by the CAF DT. Based on the foregoing, we agree with the opinions 
and recommendations of the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our 
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or 
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, 
we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2010-00954 in Executive Session on 23 February 2011, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR 
Docket Number BC-2010-00954: 

 

Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Mar 10, w/atchs. 

Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPAOC, dated 15 Dec 10. 

Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Jan 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00516

    Original file (BC 2014 00516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states that he believes the applicant completed all requirements for IDE equivalency credit and recommends the Board evaluate her records. According to the applicant’s Voluntary Separation Application time stamped 9 April 2009, her request for a separation date of 1 January 2010, was approved. The DPAPP letter dated 16 April 2014, stated “Even if you had been recommended for equivalency credit by your Developmental Team and given conditional approval by the DEDB and AF/Al, you...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01889

    Original file (BC-2010-01889.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests in the statement that eight areas of evidence be reviewed: 1. In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of an 18-page congressional complaint of evidence, with attachments; the LOR and contested OPR with attachments, emails, a conversation transcript with her former commander, memoranda for record, a witness statement, character reference/witness lists, and extracts from her master personnel records. The complete DPAPF evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02876

    Original file (BC-2006-02876.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02876 INDEX CODE: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 Mar 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Brief (OSB) for the CY06A (13 March 2006) (P0506A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB) be corrected to explicitly reflect that his in-residence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01266

    Original file (BC-2006-01266.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFPC/DPAFE's complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO recommends denial and states eligible officers meeting a board have the option to submit a letter to the board president addressing any matter of record concerning themselves that they believe is important to their consideration for promotion. The completion of ACSC is not a requirement for promotion to lieutenant colonel. After reviewing the complete case file, we noted that the applicant’s Officer Selection Brief (OSB) did not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01657

    Original file (BC-2003-01657.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAO states that the applicant’s CY02 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board Officer Selection Brief (OSB) had inaccurate duty history information, which has now been corrected. A complete copy of their evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO states that they disagree with the applicant’s contention that his MSM, 1OLC, decoration was missing from his Officer Selection Record (OSR) when...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02014

    Original file (BC-2005-02014.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02014 INDEX CODE: 131.01 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 DEC 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by special selection board (SSB) for the CY04A Colonel Central Selection Board (6 Dec 04) (P0604A) with his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02793

    Original file (BC-2012-02793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPF recommends denial of his request to change his OPB to reflect select in the Developmental Opportunity block and noted the applicant is not a "Select." The complete DPAPF evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOO recommends denial, stating, in part, after careful review of his application, no evidence was found to show the applicant's nonselections for promotion to the grade of Lt Col by the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02253

    Original file (BC-2006-02253.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DPPPEP complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO recommends denial. The DPPPO complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and states his record of performance demonstrates he’s ready for the responsibilities of lieutenant colonel. Notwithstanding the above, we find sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01459

    Original file (BC-2005-01459.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01459 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 6 Nov 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 2003A (CY03A) Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03508

    Original file (BC-2005-03508.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 03508 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 JULY 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 2005A Below- the-Promotion Zone (BPZ) Lieutenant Colonel...