RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00904
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an
honorable discharge; or entry level separation without
characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenter
the military.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
One of the two accounts of fraudulent entry was a minor mistake
on his paperwork when he accidently answered the third question
on his Air Force Form 2030, USAF Drug and Alcohol Abuse
Certificate, incorrectly. The second account was his urine
sample at Basic Military Training (BMT) testing positive. He
participated in one act of smoking marijuana before leaving for
BMT. He is asking for a second chance to correct the wrong he
made in 2006. He no longer uses marijuana or any other drug and
he is very serious about making a strong commitment to becoming a
valued member of the United States military and be someone the
military would be proud to have.
The evidence submitted in support of the applicants appeal is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained
in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air
Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in
this Record of Proceedings.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOS and DPSOA reviewed this application and recommends
denial. DPSOS states the applicant did not submit any evidence
or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the
discharge processing. He provided no facts warranting a change
to his narrative reason for separation. Based on the
documentation on file in his master personnel records, the
discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive
requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the
discretion of the discharge authority. DPSOA states the
applicants RE code of 2C is required per Air Force Instruction
36-2606, Chapter 3, for members who separate with an entry level
separation and uncharacterized character of service.
Complete copies of the DPSOS and DPSOA evaluations are at
Exhibits B and C respectively.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant
on 26 November 2010, for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and
recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our
conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or
injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issue involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-00904 in Executive Session on 6 January 2011,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Vice Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2010-00904:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Mar 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 4 Oct 10.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 6 Oct 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Nov 10.
Vice Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04705
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04705 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow his reentry into the military. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00942
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, medical records and letters from his doctors. On 19 Nov 08, the applicant was notified of his commanders intent to recommend that he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFPD 36-32, Air Force Military Training and AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, paragraph 5.14. for Erroneous Enlistment. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02525
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02525 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 20 Oct 08, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for Erroneous Enlistment. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02501
On 31 Jan 11, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for a condition that interferes with military service, specifically for mental disorders. DPSOS states, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the narrative reason for separation and separation code was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04381
Specifically, it was discovered he had a history of migraine headaches. DPSOS states the documentation on file in the master personnel records supports the basis for the discharge and the applicants entry level separation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-04432
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AETC/SGPS recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change his character of service and RE code. However, barring evidence in the applicant’s enlistment documents the condition existed prior to his entrance on active duty. DPSOA states the applicant’s RE code 2C is required per AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the United States Air Force, chapter 3, based on his involuntary discharge with an...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03015
While attending Air Force BMT, he was notified on 8 August 2007 of his commander’s intention to recommend him for an Entry Level Separation due to a condition that interferes with military service; specifically mental disorders. A review of the applicant’s records reveals there was an error in his separation record in that he was incorrectly discharged from the Air Force with a Separation Code of “JFX” and a Narrative Reason for Separation of “Personality Disorder.” This does not infer that...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01359
On 12 Dec 08, the applicants commander notified him that he was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force for entry-level performance or conduct. DPSOS states that based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the service characterization was appropriately administered and within the discretion of the discharge authority. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04097
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04097 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His entry-level separation with uncharacterized service; Reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an Honorable discharge or entry-level separation without characterization of service); and Separation Program Designator (SPD) code...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02875
On 16 Sep 82, the applicant was notified by the Director, Personnel/Administrative Services, that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for misconduct (specifically for drug abuse). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE...