Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01359
Original file (BC-2010-01359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01359 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His reentry (RE) code of 2C (“Involuntarily separated with an 
honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without 
characterization of service”) be changed to allow his 
reenlistment. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His father’s ill health weighed heavily on his mind and inhibited 
his ability to succeed while he was in technical training school. 

 

In support of the appeal, the applicant provides copies of his 
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, and his father’s Certificate of Death. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force as an airman 
basic on 22 Jul 08 for a term of four years. 

 

On 12 Dec 08, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was 
recommending he be discharged from the Air Force for entry-level 
performance or conduct. The commander recommended he be given an 
entry level separation. 

 

The reason for the commander’s recommendation was the applicant’s 
failure to make satisfactory progress in a required training 
program and for falsifying his progress check score sheet by 
placing false grades on the sheet with the intent to deceive the 
instructors. For this misconduct, on 30 Oct 08 he received a 
Letter of Reprimand (LOR), and on 31 Oct 08 an unfavorable 
information file was established. 

 


He acknowledged receipt of the notification of discharge on 
17 Dec 08, and waived his right to consult counsel and submit 
statements in his own behalf. The discharge case was reviewed by 
the base legal office and found to be legally sufficient to 
support discharge. 

 

The discharge authority approved the separation and directed he 
be discharged with uncharacterized service. He was separated on 
24 Dec 08, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative 
Separation of Airmen, for entry-level performance and conduct 
with uncharacterized service and an RE code of 2C. He served 
five months, and three days of active service. 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of 
the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibit C and Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: 

 

AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states that based on the 
documentation on file in the master personnel records, the 
discharge to include the service characterization was 
appropriately administered and within the discretion of the 
discharge authority. The applicant did not provide any evidence 
of an error or injustice in the processing of his discharge 
warranting a change to his character of service, separation code 
or narrative reason for separation. 

 

DPSOS indicates they understand how the medical situation with 
his father could have affected his ability to concentrate on his 
studies and could have ultimately resulted in his elimination 
from the Emergency Management Apprentice Course. However, the 
applicant received a LOR for falsifying a progress check score 
sheet which is not excusable regardless of his father’s medical 
health condition. 

 

DPSOS indicates the applicant’s service characterization is 
correct as reflected on his DD Form 214. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states the applicant did not 
provide any proof of error or injustice regarding his RE Code. 
The RE code 2C is required based on the entry-level separation 
with an uncharacterized character of service per the governing 
instruction. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: 

 

Copies of the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to the 
applicant on 29 Oct 10, for review and comment within 30 days. 
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit E). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations 
of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) and 
adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of error or injustice. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2010-01359 in Executive Session on 16 Dec 10, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 


The following documentary evidence was considered under Docket 
Number BC-2010-01359: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Apr 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 17 Sep 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 28 Sep 10. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Oct 10. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00485

    Original file (BC-2010-00485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00485 INDEX CODE: 110.02, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to RE code 1C and that she be allowed to return to active duty. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-00844

    Original file (BC-2008-00844.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 Mar 02, the applicant's commander notified her that he was recommending she be discharged from the Air Force for misconduct-minor disciplinary infractions. They found no evidence of error or injustice and the applicant did not submit any evidence. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01596

    Original file (BC-2011-01596.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01596 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code of 2C (Entry Level Performance or Conduct) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed so he can apply to the Air National Guard or Air Force Reserve. The separation recommendation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01107

    Original file (BC-2009-01107.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 Feb 09, the applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to recommend his discharge from the Air Force for entry level performance and conduct in accordance with AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen . Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the service characterization, was appropriately administered and within the discretion of the discharge authority. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02363

    Original file (BC-2011-02363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02363 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty be corrected as follows: 1. DPSOS states, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the narrative reason for separation and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02332

    Original file (BC-2011-02332.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The documentation on file in the master personnel records supports the basis for discharge and the applicant's entry level service characterization. The complete AFPC/DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of his request for a change his RE code, stating, the RE code of 2C is driven by his entry level separation with uncharacterized service. On 11 Aug 2011, HQ AETC/SGPS validated the applicant's discharge processing, but state they support a change of the RE code to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03465

    Original file (BC-2007-03465.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03465 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) and separation codes be changed to allow his return to the Air Force. Applicant was separated on 7 Aug 07 under the provisions of AFI 36- 3208 (Entry Level Performance and Conduct), with uncharacterized service and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02727

    Original file (BC-2011-02727.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02727 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code of 2C, Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code of JGA, and Narrative Reason for Separation (Entry Level Performance or Conduct) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed so he can apply...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01119

    Original file (BC-2012-01119.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant concurred with his supervisor’s recommendation and stated that he would rather separate from the Air Force instead of retraining. On 16 Jan 09, the applicant received a referral enlisted performance report (EPR), for violations of Article 86, UCMJ, failing to report to duty at the prescribed time and twice failing his CDC EOC exam. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2012-01119 in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02487

    Original file (BC-2007-02487.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    The type of his separation be changed from entry-level separation to a medical discharge. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice regarding the applicant’s request that his uncharacterized service be changed to an honorable discharge, his RE code of 2C be changed, his entry level separation be changed to a medical discharge, and his records be corrected to reflect his eligibility for unemployment compensation. ...