RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

 AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00762 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: YES 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 
from 8 February 2008 through 1 October 2008 be changed to 
reflect the correct inclusive dates, remove duplicate bullet 
statements, and reflect the correct dates of supervision. 

 

By email, the applicant requested that the contested report be 
removed. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

The previous EPR closing in February 2008 and the October 2008 
change of rating official (CRO) is evidence of the incorrect 
inclusive dates and duplicate bullet statements. The initial 
performance feedback worksheet and statement, documents the CRO 
action from her previous supervisor. The report should reflect 
supervision with the CRO report beginning on 6 June 2008 through 
1 October 2008, for a total of 118 days and not enough days of 
supervision to complete a CRO report. 

 

She contacted her rating chain and they made various attempts to 
contact her supervisor to make the requested corrections; 
however, her supervisor would not make the requested changes. 
She filed an appeal through the Evaluation Reports Appeals Board 
(ERAB) to have the report removed; however, her request was 
denied. 

 

In support of her appeal, the applicant provides a copy of her 
EPRs closing 15 February 2008 and 1 October 2008 (validating the 
duplicate bullet statements; a copy of her initial performance 
feedback worksheet and feedback statement, dated 5 June 2008 
(validating that a CRO occurred), and a letter from her first 
sergeant (validating her attempts to have the reports 
corrected). 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 


________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

Based on information from the Air Force evaluation, the 
applicant filed an appeal through the ERAB; however, the ERAB 
denied voiding the report. 

 

The applicant’s EPR profile of the last ten reports follows: 

 

 PERIOD ENDING OVERALL RATING 

 

 04 Jun 02 5 

 15 Jan 03 4 

 15 Jan 04 5 

 04 Jun 04 5 

 16 May 05 5 

 16 May 06 5 

 15 Feb 07 5 

 15 Feb 08 5 

 #01 Oct 08 4 

 01 Oct 09 5 

 

# Contested Report 

 

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, 
extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIDEP recommends denial of the applicant’s request to 
void the report, but, in the alternative, they recommend the 
report be replaced with the reaccomplished report. 

 

After reviewing the applicant’s request, they found that the 
start date was incorrect; that the number of days of supervision 
appeared to be incorrect; and the report did contain several 
duplicate bullets. However, in accordance with (IAW) Air Force 
Instruction (AFI) 36-2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted 
Reports, para 1.3.1., AFPC/DPSIDEP will not void a report when 
the error or injustice can be corrected administratively. 

 

They contacted the applicant’s rater, who in turn provided 
replacement bullets and an explanation on the number of days of 
supervision; that although there was some contemplation of a 
6 June 2008 CRO, it was determined to be in the best interest of 


the applicant not to CRO her at that time and the CRO did not 
take place. 

 

The complete AFPC/DPSIDEP evaluation, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 30 April 2010 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D). 

 

By email, the applicant amended her request to have the 
contested report removed (Exhibit E). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting 
corrective action. We took notice of the applicant’s complete 
submission, including the statement by her first sergeant in 
support of her appeal. Additionally, we considered the 
applicant’s amendment to her application to try to have the 
contested report removed; however, we did not find evidence to 
support her request for removal of the report. The Air Force 
office of primary responsibility (OPR) has adequately addressed 
the applicant’s issues and we are in agreement with their 
opinion and recommendation to have the report replaced with the 
reaccomplished report. Accordingly, we recommend her record be 
corrected to the extent indicated below. 

 

4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) 
involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 


The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that: 

 

 a. The AF Form 910, Enlisted Performance Report (AB thru 
TSgt), rendered for the period 8 February 2008 through 
1 October 2008, be declared void and removed from her record. 

 

 b. The attached AF Form 910, Enlisted Performance Report 
(AB thru TSgt), rendered for the period 16 February 2008 through 
1 October 2008, be accepted for file. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00762 in Executive Session on 2 November 2010, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Jan 10, 

 with attachments. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDEP, dated 9 Apr 10, 

 with attachments. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Apr 10. 

 Exhibit E. Email, Applicant, dated 18 Oct 10. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 


AFBCMR BC-2010-00762 

 

 

 

 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF 

 

 Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for 
Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States 
Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: 

 

 The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to 
APPLICANT be corrected to show that: 

 

 a. The AF Form 910, Enlisted Performance Report (AB thru TSgt), rendered for the 
period 8 February 2008 through 1 October 2008, be, and hereby is, declared void and removed 
from her record. 

 

 b. The attached AF Form 910, Enlisted Performance Report (AB thru TSgt), 
rendered for the period 16 February 2008 through 1 October 2008, be accepted for file. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Director 

 Air Force Review Boards Agency 

 

Attachment: 

AF Form 910, dtd 2 Oct 08