Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00584
Original file (BC-2010-00584.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00584 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, be corrected to reflect: 

 

1. Her last name of be corrected. 

 

2. Her pay grade be changed from E-4 (senior airman) to E-5 
(staff sergeant). 

 

3. Her Foreign Service be changed from “0” to “2” years 
(Partially administratively corrected by AFPC to reflect 1 year, 
11 months, and 27 days). 

 

4. Her separation code and reentry (RE) code be added to the 
DD Form 214. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

Her DD Form 214 is incorrect and has missing information. 

 

She was an E-5, with a date of rank of 1 August 2009 before she 
was honorably discharged; however, her DD Form 214 Worksheet 
reflects E-4. 

 

She had Foreign Service at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa, Japan from 
2006 through 2008; however, no Foreign Service is reflected on 
her DD Form 214 Worksheet. 

 

She was married in December 2008 and her last name was changed 
to “XXXX;” however, the change is not listed on her DD Form 214. 

 

In support of the request, the applicant provides copies of her 
DD Form 214 Worksheet, personnel data from the Military 
Personnel Data System (MilPDS), and marriage certificate. 


The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

Available records reflect the applicant entered the Regular Air 
Force on 27 September 2005. 

 

She enlisted as an airman basic and was progressively promoted 
to the grade of staff sergeant, with an effective date of 
promotion of 1 August 2009. 

 

The applicant was honorably discharged on 26 September 2009. 
Her DD Form 214 reflects her narrative reason for separation as 
completion of required service, her separation code as MBK, and 
reenty code as 1J (eligible to reenlist, but elects separation). 

 

In accordance with AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents, the 
DD Form 214 Worksheet is a document used to help personnel 
prepare the actual DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or 
Discharge from Active Duty. The DD Form 214 Worksheet is 
completed by using the unit personnel records group (UPRG) 
information contained in the report on individual personnel 
(RIP) from the Air Force Personnel Center. The separating or 
retiring individual is required to review the worksheet prior to 
the completion of the DD Form 214. 

 

HQ AFPC/DPAPP verified and confirmed the applicant had boots on 
ground Foreign Service at Kadena Air Base, Japan, from 21 April 
2006 to 16 April 2008 and have indicated the records will be 
administratively corrected to reflect this. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIRP recommends denial with regard to changing the 
name on her DD Form 214. DPSIRP states the applicant was 
advised on 26 May 2010 that either the original or a certified 
or a notarized copy of her marriage certificate was needed and, 
upon receipt, her name would be changed in her service record. 
As of this date, the required documentation has not been 
provided. 

 

The complete HQ AFPC/DPSIRP evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 16 July 2010 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has not received a 
response. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice with regard to 
the applicant’s name change, reentry code, and Foreign Service 
request. In this respect, we note the applicant has been 
advised of the required documentation to effect a name change; 
however, she has failed to provide the requested documentation. 
Further, we note that her reentry code is properly reflected on 
her DD Form 214 and that her Foreign Service has been verified 
and will be administratively corrected on her DD Form 214. 
Therefore, in view of the above and absent any evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting this portion of 
the application. 

 

4. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice with regard to 
the applicant’s rank and grade on her DD Form 214. In this 
respect, we note the applicant was promoted to the grade of 
staff sergeant with a date of rank of 1 August 2009 prior to her 
discharge. Therefore, we recommend her records be corrected to 
the extent indicated below. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 
26 September 2009, she was discharged in the pay grade of E5, 
staff sergeant. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2010-00584 in Executive Session on 23 September 2010, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

, Panel Chair 

, Member 

, Member 

 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered for BC-2010-00584: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, undated, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIRP, dated 8 Jul 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Jul 10. 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00091

    Original file (BC-2010-00091.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00091 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. She remained in South Dakota for 12 days, at which time her unit ordered her to return. The complete HQ AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00945

    Original file (BC 2013 00945.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his birth certificate, WD AGO Form 53-55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge; WD-AGO Form 100, Army of the United States Separation Qualification Record, a witness statement from a lieutenant stating that he was stationed in Tinian, Island, Japan with the applicant and various other documents associated with his request. A review of the applicant’s master personnel records and documentation submitted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03603

    Original file (BC-2011-03603.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03603 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be amended with a DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, to reflect her name as Vanessa J. Peay. As the applicant has not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02504

    Original file (BC-2010-02504.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPAPP states a review of the applicant’s master personnel records and documentation submitted failed to substantiate Foreign Service time in Vietnam. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02353

    Original file (BC-2012-02353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02353 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Approved Honorable Involuntary Separation or Entry Level Separation) be changed to an RE code “1”. In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal statement and letters of recommendation. The complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00420

    Original file (BC-2003-00420.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    As a result, the OPR and MSM 2OLC were not in her OSR when the CY01B board convened. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends by regulation the OPR was required to have been a matter of record at the time of the CY01B board. Therefore, the award cannot be included in the applicant’s OSR for CY01B board’s consideration because it did not exist when...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00605

    Original file (BC-2009-00605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    HQ AFPC/DPAPP was not able to confirm the applicant served in Vietnam; therefore, the applicant is ineligible for Vietnam service awards. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. We note the applicant’s DD Form 214 will be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00570

    Original file (BC-2010-00570.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIRP states that AFI 36-2608, Military Personnel Records System, requires the source document for the requested change be either the original or a certified or notarized copy of the original. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rational as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01279

    Original file (BC-2012-01279.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, it does not reflect the entire time he was TDY in Korea. The applicant’s response to the Air Force evaluation is noted, however, we find no evidence that his records should be corrected to reflect any service time beyond that currently reflected on his DD Form 214. ________________________________________________________________ 3 Panel Chair Member Member The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 13 Sep 2012 and 3 Oct 2012, under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01191

    Original file (BC 2014 01191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant submitted a personal letter to the board and states the USAF lost all of his personnel records when they sent him from Kadena AFB to Maxwell AFB for Retirement. Examiner’s Note: On 27 May 14 an inquiry letter was sent to AFPC/DPAPP requesting to adjust their advisory opinion in the following manner: “The applicant’s AF Form 7, Page 92 of his records reflects that he was in combat mission in Vietnam on 18 Oct 67. With respect to his request for his...