RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01079
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to 1A (Ineligible to
reenlist, but condition waived) rather than the code of 4H (Serving
suspended punishment pursuant to Article 15, UCMJ).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He believes his receipt of the RE code of 4H is unjust. He believes
there is no reason he should not be allowed to reenlist into another
service component. He wants to provide for his family and serve his
country in the best way possible.
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided copies of his DD
Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 27 December 2005. He
was progressively promoted to the grade of Airman. On 23 October 2006
he received an Article 15 for drinking an alcoholic beverage and being
under the age of 21. The punishment imposed on him was forfeiture of
$500.00 pay per month for two months suspended until 12 April 2007,
after which time the punishment would be remitted without further
action unless sooner vacated. The Air Force had implemented the FY07
Enlisted Force Shaping Program that included the Date of Separation
(DOS) Rollback Program, effective 30 October 2006. Consequently,
airmen with less than 14 years of service and an established RE code
of 4H, had their DOS accelerated. As he had received an Article 15,
he was separated under the DOS Rollback Program. He was honorably
discharged on 15 February 2007 after having served for 1 year, 1
month, and 19 days.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. DPPRS states that based on the
documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge
was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the
discharge regulation. The discharge action was within the
discretionary right of the discharge authority. Further, the
applicant did not provide any evidence or identify any error or
injustice that occurred in the discharge processing that would warrant
a change to his RE code.
DPPRS’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial. DPPAE states there was no evidence of
an error or an injustice; nor did the applicant provide evidence of
such.
DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
27 April 2007 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date,
no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice in regard to his request that
his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to “1A”, Ineligible
to reenlist, but condition waived. After a thorough review of the
documentation provided in support of his appeal and the evidence of
record, it is our opinion that given the circumstances the RE code
assigned to the applicant was proper and in compliance with the
appropriate directives.
4. Notwithstanding the above, we believe his commander’s action to
suspend his punishment until remission on 12 September 2007 unless
sooner vacated, while a common practice designed to give airmen
another chance, actually accomplished the opposite in this case.
Because he was in an administrative punishment status when the FY07
Enlisted Force Shaping Program took effect, he was selected for a Date
of Separation (DOS) rollback and discharged even though his commander
had shown definite intent to consider remission of his punishment in
September 2007. Consequently, it is our opinion he should be given
the opportunity to enlist in the service component of his choosing.
Whether or not he is successful will depend on the needs of the
service and our recommendation in no way guarantees that he will be
allowed to return to any branch of the service. Therefore, we
recommend the applicant's records be corrected to the extent indicated
below.
______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 15 February 2007 he
was separated under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 1.2
(Secretarial Authority) with a separation code of JFF and a
reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 3K.
______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2007-01079 in Executive Session on 14 June 2007, under the provisions
of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Panel Chair
Ms. Glenda H. Scheiner, Member
Mr. Michael F. McGhee, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Feb 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 11 Apr 07
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 18 Apr 07
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Apr 07.
JAMES W. RUSSELL, III
Panel Chair
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC
[pic]
Office Of The Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR BC-2007-01079
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 15 February
2007, he was separated under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph
1.2 (Secretarial Authority) with a separation code of JFF and a
reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 3K.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00417
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00417 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 AUGUST 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation program designator (SPD) and reenlistment eligibility (RE) codes be changed to permit re-entry into the military (Army). Examiner’s Note: On 16 May 06, AFPC/DPPRSP...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01938
Specifically, he was serving on a suspended punishment pursuant to an Article 15 at the time of his separation. In accordance with Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3208, “Airmen separating with RE code 4H or 4I will be separated with SPD code JBK.” He was serving on a suspended punishment pursuant to an Article 15 at the time of his separation thereby validating the SPD and RE code he received. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00680
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00680 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 SEP 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code and separation code be changed. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00242 INDEX NUMBER: 110.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 2C be changed to an eligible code so that he can reenlist and continue in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00067
While serving in the Air Force he had all but one 5 Enlisted Performance Reports (EPRs). He received $10,314.00 in separation pay and received a 2X RE Code. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their separation.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00437
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00437 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2C” be changed to allow his enlistment into either the Army or Air Force. On 19 June 1998, he received an uncharacterized entry-level separation under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Fraudulent Entry into...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03336
_________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 22 March 2000, he was separated under the provisions of AFR 36-3208, paragraph 1.2 (Secretarial Authority) with a separation code of JFF and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 3K. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Dec 02, w/atchs....
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00512
On 16 March 2004, he was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen (entry-level performance and conduct) and was issued an uncharacterized discharge. Therefore, we recommend that his records be corrected to the extent indicated below. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 16...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01415 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be upgraded and the reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, reviewed the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01106
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied, and states, in part, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, the Board is of the opinion there was no deliberate deception on the...