Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01860
Original file (BC-2009-01860.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2009-01860
            INDEX CODE:  107.00
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect receipt of the following awards:

      1.  South West Asia Service Medal (SWASM)

      2.  Armed Forces Service Medal (AFSM)

      3.  Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM)

      4.  Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal (GWOT-E)

      5.  Global War on Terrorism Service Medal (GWOT-S)

      6.  Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM)

      7.  Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon (AFESR)

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He completed extended tours in the Middle East  and  acknowledged  award  of
the medals after he retired.

In support of the application, the applicant submits copies  of  his  orders
and his DD Form 214.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 1 Oct 03, the applicant retired from the Regular Air Force in  the  grade
of master sergeant after serving 16 years 3 months and  29  days  on  active
duty.

The Directorate of Assignments (DPAPP) verified he served a  total  of  five
overseas tours as follows:  Germany (Aug 84 to Jun 87),  Italy  (Nov  89  to
Nov 93), Korea (Aug 95 to Aug 96), Saudi Arabia (Feb  98  to  Jun  98),  and
Kuwait (Aug 02 to Dec 02).

The Air Force office of  primary  responsibility  verified  the  applicant’s
entitlement to the AFEM, GWOT-E, GWOT-S,  KDSM,  and  the  AFESR  with  Gold
Border and his records will be administratively corrected to  reflect  these
awards.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted  from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the  letter  prepared  by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request  for  the  SWASM
and the AFSM.

Individuals authorized the SWASM must have served in  support  of  Operation
DESSERT SHIELD or DESERT STORM in one or more areas of responsibility  (AOR)
between 2 Aug 90 and 30 Nov 95.  The  applicant  was  not  deployed  to  the
qualifying AOR during the inclusive period of the SWASM.

The AFSM is awarded to members of the armed forces of the U.S. who, after  1
Jun 92: (1) participate, or have participated, as members of  U.S.  military
units, in a U.S. military operation that  is  deemed  to  be  a  significant
activity by the Joint Chiefs of Staff; and (2) encounter  no  foreign  armed
opposition or imminent threat of hostile  action.   The  applicant  did  not
deploy in support of a qualifying operation to be entitled to the AFSM.

Examiner’s Note:  Italy-based troops supporting operations Provide  Promise,
Joint Endeavor, Able Sentry, Deny Flight, Maritime Monitor and  Sharp  Guard
are authorized to  receive  the  AFSM  award.   Previously,  the  medal  was
limited to troops at Aviano Air Base and  Brindisi  Air  Station.   Although
the applicant was assigned duties at Aviano, Air Base, he was  not  deployed
in support of the aforementioned operations.

The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14  Aug
09, for review and comment within 30 days.  As of  this  date,  this  office
has received no response (Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice regarding the applicant’s request for  award
of the SWASM and AFSM medals.  Based  on  our  review  of  the  evidence  of
record and the established award criteria, the applicant does not  meet  the
necessary requirements and is  therefore  not  eligible  for  the  requested
awards.  The personal sacrifice the applicant endured  for  his  country  is
noted and the  recommendation  to  deny  the  requested  relief  in  no  way
diminishes the high regard we have for his service.  Nevertheless,  in  view
of the above, we find no basis to favorably consider  this  portion  of  his
application.  Therefore, we agree with the  opinion  and  recommendation  of
the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt  its  rationale  as
the basis for our determination that  relief  beyond  that  already  granted
administratively is not warranted.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 25 Feb 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Panel Chair
      Member
      Member

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2009-01860:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 20 May 09.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 27 Jul 09.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Aug 09.





                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05085

    Original file (BC-2011-05085.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-05085 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following awards: a. Only one award of the GWOT-E is authorized for serving in OEF/OIF, regardless of how many times an individual returns to serve...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01955

    Original file (BC 2013 01955.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01955 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Armed Forces Service Medal (AFSM). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05404

    Original file (BC 2012 05404.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, an analysis of his records revealed that he should have been awarded the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal (GWOT-E) and Air Force Expeditionary Service Ribbon (AFESR) with Gold Border (GB) for his deployment to Diego Garcia in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM. Additionally, located within the applicant's military personnel record is Service Medal Award Verification (AF Form 104) dated 5 August 2005, awarding the applicant the GWOT-E and the AFESR w/GB. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00802

    Original file (BC-2009-00802.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant served on active duty with the Regular Air Force from 18 Jun 02 to 18 Dec 04. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the ACM. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and it appears his record has been corrected to indicate award of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02509

    Original file (BC-2007-02509.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02509 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 10 FEB 09 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Meritorious Service Medal first Oak Leaf Cluster (1 OLC), Air Force Commendation Medal (3 OLC) with Valor, the Kosovo Campaign Medal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04355

    Original file (BC-2008-04355.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The primary difference between the two awards is that the service medal is intended for those who performed support duty within the United States, while the expeditionary medal recognizes those who were deployed to foreign countries. After a thorough review of the available records, we found no evidence that the applicant is eligible for the award of the GWOT-E medal. However, the AFESR/GWOT-E authorization message she provided, dated February 7, 2005, appears to be for permanent party...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02063

    Original file (BC-2011-02063.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s records reflect he served on active duty from 10 Sep 82 to 31 Dec 02. On 29 Jun 11, AFPC/DPSIDRA informed the applicant his entitlement to the GWOT-S had been verified and that it was also determined he was eligible for the Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM); his records will be administratively corrected to reflect these awards. The GWOT-E is awarded to Air Force active duty, reserve and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02017

    Original file (BC-2006-02017.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore the only remaining issue before the Board is the award of the ICM. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 15 September 2006, for review and response. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00517

    Original file (BC-2009-00517.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00517 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02893

    Original file (BC 2014 02893.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the GWOT-E, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. After a review of the applicant’s personnel records and Defense Finance and Accounting Service records, the applicant’s deployment to Iraq...