Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01850
Original file (BC-2009-01850.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-01850

XXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE

HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Separation or Release from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect that he was awarded the Air Force Small Arms Expert Ribbon (AFSAER), and his personnel file be updated to reflect the same.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

During basic training, he qualified for and was awarded the AFSAER by shooting expert.

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force as an airman basic on 5 Dec 79 for a period of four years.

On 23 Sep 83, he was honorably discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-10 (strength reduction – first-term airman involuntary) from the Air Force and was credited with 3 years, 9 months, and 23 days of active service.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial, indicating the AFSAEMR is awarded to members who, after 1 Jan 63, qualify as “expert” in small-arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. A thorough review of the applicant’s personnel record reveals no documentation of his assertions, nor does he provide any documentation to substantiate his claim.

A complete copy of the DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 20 Jul 09 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting a change to the applicant’s record to indicate award of the AFSAER. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Other than his own assertions, the applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe he earned entitlement to the AFSAER. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-01850 in Executive Session on 17 Sep 09, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

Mrs. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair

Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member

Mr. Steven A. Cantrell, Member

The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-01850 was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 May 09.

Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.

Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIDR, dated 9 Jul 09.

Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Jul 09.

CHARLENE M. BRADLEY

Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00190

    Original file (BC-2008-00190.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was court-martialed for drug use and did not complete his full military service; therefore, he is not entitled to this award. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response dated 21 Mar 08, the applicant states he requested the SAEMR based on his qualifications in firing expert on the M-16 rifle during technical school. Novel, Member The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03108

    Original file (BC-2007-03108.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03108 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) for service he performed in Lebanon and Grenada. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D). Insufficient relevant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03034

    Original file (BC-2008-03034.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C & D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. DPAPP states no evidence was found in the applicant’s records that he was assigned duties in Vietnam. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01705

    Original file (BC-2008-01705.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    HQ Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) has administratively corrected his requests with the exception of item 29 and his request for award of the Air Force Longevity Service Award (AFLSA). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIMC recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change block 29 of his DD Form 214 to reflect the dates 15 July 2002 – 29 October 2007. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02780

    Original file (BC-2005-02780.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02780 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 MAR 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be given credit for service in Vietnam, award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) for service in Vietnam in Oct 69 and award of the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-04024

    Original file (BC-2008-04024.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty , issued in conjunction with his release from active duty on 23 Jun 07, be amended in Item 13, Decoration, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized , to reflect award of the Air Force Achievement Medal. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2008-04024...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03477

    Original file (BC-2008-03477.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. The complete DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response, the applicant refers the Board to the documentation submitted in support of his application for correction of his military records. The Board notes the applicant’s records were administratively corrected to reflect award of the AFEM and he may...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03797

    Original file (BC-2008-03797.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPSIDR states the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to substantiate his claim and they are unable to make a determination at this time. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). Therefore, in the absence of evidence of his entitlement to any additional awards or medals, no further action by this Board is necessary.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03112

    Original file (BC-2008-03112.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-03112 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to include the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) on his DD Form 214. While the applicant was unable to provide a copy of the orders approving the MSM, he was able to provide a signed certificate and validated...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04060

    Original file (BC-2007-04060.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPSIDR states the KSDM was approved by the Department of Defense (DoD) in February 2004 to active duty AF personnel for military service in the Republic of Korea (ROK) and surrounding waters after 28 Jul 54 to a date to be determined by the Secretary of Defense. HQ AFPC/DPSIDR's complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states he has...