Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03252
Original file (BC-2008-03252.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-03252

XXXXXXX, XX COUNSEL: NONE

HEARING DESIRED: NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2X” (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered for but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to allow him to enlist in the Air National Guard.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His inability to serve his country once again is a harsh punishment for a single incident (an Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for aggravated assault).

In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty, Enlisted Performance Reports (EPR), and an Air Force Achievement Medal certificate.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant’s military records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force as an airman basic (E-1) on 26 Oct 94 for a period of four years and was progressively promoted to the rank of senior airman (E-4) with an effective date and date of rank of 26 Oct 97.

On 26 Nov 97, he was given an Article 15, UCMJ, consisting of reduction in grade to airman first class (suspended), forfeiture of $200.00 pay per month for two months, and 45 days of extra duty (all but 20 days suspended). The reasons for this action were:

a. He did, on or about 27 Oct 97, assault an individual by threatening her with a Louisville Slugger Baseball bat.

b. He did on or about 27 Oct 97, wrongfully communicate a threat to an individual, telling her, “I’m going to bust your a--,” or words to that effect.

On 2 Dec 98, the applicant was furnished a referral Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) for the period 1 Nov 97 through 17 Nov 98, rendering him ineligible for re-enlistment.

On 25 Apr 99, the applicant was released from active duty based on the completion of his required active service and assigned an RE code of “2X”. He was furnished an Honorable characterization of service and transferred to the Air Force Reserve. He was credited with four years and six months of total active service.

Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an investigative Report, which is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial, indicating the RE Code is correct since the applicant involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge. Further, the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to warrant corrective action based on an injustice.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 17 Sep 09 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E).

A copy of the FBI Report of Investigation and a request for post-service information was forwarded to applicant on 25 Sep 09 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting a change to the applicant’s RE code. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence the RE code of 2X, issued in conjunction with his honorable discharge, was erroneously assigned or inaccurately reflected the circumstances of his separation, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2009-03252 in Executive Session on 18 Nov 09, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

XXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair

XXXXXXXXXX, Panel Member

XXXXXXXXXX, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Sep 08, w/atchs.

Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.

Exhibit C. FBI Report.

Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 15 Sep 09.

Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 17 Sep 09.

Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 25 Sep 09, w/atch.

XXXXXXXXXX

Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01997

    Original file (BC-2009-01997.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 Jan 04, the applicant initiated an AF Form 102, Inspector General Personal and Fraud, Waste and Abuse Complaint Registration , alleging reprisal and abuse of authority by his chain of command relative to his EPR and his request for extension of his (DEROS). On 20 Dec 05, the applicant was notified by Headquarters, Air Mobility Command Office of the Inspector General (HQ AMC/IG) of its findings regarding his allegations. SAF/IG reviewed the HQ AMC/IG report of investigation and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03383

    Original file (BC-2007-03383.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03383 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) be changed in a manner to allow him to enter the Air National Guard. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02099

    Original file (BC-2002-02099.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a rebuttal to the Air Force evaluation, applicant now requests that she be reinstated to active duty in the Air Force, promoted to the grade of technical sergeant (TSgt) (E-6) and allowed to cross train into the Paralegal career field she was approved for prior to her discharge. The applicant’s complete statement is at Exhibit L. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommends that the applicant’s RE code be changed to “3K,”...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01103

    Original file (BC-2009-01103.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. The applicant’s DD Form 214 is correct and she has not provided any evidence of an error or injustice to warrant the requested changes to her discharge...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9800035

    Original file (9800035.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Unfortunately, the AF Form 418 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in his military personnel record. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 16 Oct 98, w/atchs; Letter, dated 2 Oct 98; Statement BARBARA A. WESTGATE Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-00035 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-00039

    Original file (BC-2009-00039.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the applicant’s general discharge for minor disciplinary infractions was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander’s discretionary authority. In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicant’s general discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01107

    Original file (BC-2009-01107.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 Feb 09, the applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to recommend his discharge from the Air Force for entry level performance and conduct in accordance with AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen . Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the service characterization, was appropriately administered and within the discretion of the discharge authority. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05874

    Original file (BC 2012 05874.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05874 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05874

    Original file (BC 2012 05874.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05874 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00516

    Original file (BC-2009-00516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00516 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2C-Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without service characterization be changed to allow him to enlist in the National Guard. The HQ AFPC/DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit...