RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-
01812
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her reentry (RE) of code 2X (First-term, second term or career airman
considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective
Reenlistment Program) be changed to allow her renter into military
service.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She received an honorable discharge but the RE code she received made
her ineligible for reenlistment.
In support of her appeal, applicant submitted copies of her Enlisted
Performance Reports (EPRs).
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 10 Feb 00, the applicant contracted her initial enlistment in the
Regular Air Force. She was progressively promoted to the grade of
staff sergeant having assumed the grade effective and with a date of
rank of 1 Feb 05.
On 12 Dec 07, the applicant’s supervisor initiated an AF Form 418 and
nonrecommended her for reenlistment. On 18 Dec 07, the commander
concurred and nonselected her for reenlistment. She acknowledged the
nonselection action and indicated her intent to appeal. Her appeal was
denied on 10 Mar 08.
She was honorably discharged on 25 Mar 08. She served 8 years, 1 month
and 16 days on active duty.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends the requested relief be denied. Air Force
Instruction (AFI) 35-2602 states commanders have selective reenlistment
selection or nonselection authority. Commanders consider the service
members EPR ratings, unfavorable information from any substantial
source, the airman’s willingness to comply with Air Force standards and
the airman’s ability (or lack of) to meet required training and duty
performance levels.
DPSOA found no evidence of error or injustice. The applicant did not
provide any evidence to support her request.
AFPC/DPSOA's complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13
Apr 08 and 25 Apr 08 for review and response within 30 days. As of
this date, no response has been received by this office.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has failed to sustain her burden
of proof of the existence of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_____________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_____________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2008-01812 in Executive Session on 8 Aug 08, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Member
Mr. Kurt R. LaFrance, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Apr 08, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSOS, dated 5 Jun 08.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Jun 08.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00165
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00165 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to 1M (Eligible to reenlist, second-term or career airmen not yet...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05343
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05343 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Re-enlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to allow her to reenter the military. On 5 Jun 08, after receiving two...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01217
The DOS rollback program utilizes the Separation Program Designation (SPD) codeJBK (less than 6 years of active service) with a correspondingnarrative reason for separation of Completion of Required ActiveService because the member is denied further continuation or reenlistment and as in the applicants case, the DOS/ExpirationTerm of Service may be involuntarily accelerated. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel record, the discharge to include thecharacterization of...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-00735
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00735 INDEX CODES: 111.02, 126.03 131.09 COUNSEL: GARY R. MYERS HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Letters of Reprimand (LORs) dated 4 Oct 04, 23 Feb 05, and 18 Jul 05, be declared void and removed from her records. Her Referral Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) closing 27 Mar 05 and 15 Aug 05 be...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2005-00395-3
SECOND ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00395 INDEX CODE: 111.01, 111.05, 131.01 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: Mr. David P. Sheldon HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, she asks that her Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period 8 Jun 03 through 4 Jun 04 be removed from her...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02189
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02189 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. The raters comments state Member elected not to provide comments to the referral memo dated 24 Nov 2010. On 18 Feb 11, the applicants squadron commander did not select her for reenlistment stating she had received an Article 15 for drawing a sexual innuendo...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02847
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02847 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for discharge and her reentry code (RE) be changed to allow her to enter the Air National Guard (ANG). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03941
In a letter dated 17 Jan 08, the applicant was notified of a change to her RE code from 3A to 2Q (Personnel medically retired or discharged) and issued a DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force and the BCMR Medical Consultant at Exhibits C, D and F,...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02099
In a rebuttal to the Air Force evaluation, applicant now requests that she be reinstated to active duty in the Air Force, promoted to the grade of technical sergeant (TSgt) (E-6) and allowed to cross train into the Paralegal career field she was approved for prior to her discharge. The applicant’s complete statement is at Exhibit L. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPAE recommends that the applicant’s RE code be changed to “3K,”...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05874
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05874 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...