RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-01132
INDEX CODE: 128.13
XXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be reimbursed for an additional clothing allowance for his
Active Duty Guard Reserve (AGR) tour from May 1992 through
June 1996.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was advised to submit a correction of record application by the
Reserve Pay office at the Headquarters, Air Reserve Personnel
Center (HQ ARPC), Reserve Management Group (RMG).
In support of his appeal, the applicant submits an AF Form 1969,
Officer Uniform Allowance Certification; a copy of the Colorado Air
National Guard (ANG), Special Orders 383 and 463, and a
DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty,
issued 28 Jun 96.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant served on extended active duty (EAD) from 12 May 92
until 9 Aug 92 (in the grade of second lieutenant (2Lt)) (Special
Order A-383). On 8 Aug 92, he was ordered to EAD for the period
from 10 Aug 92 to 9 Aug 97 to complete an AGR tour (Special Order A-
463).
On 28 Jun 96, the applicant was released from active duty in the
grade of captain, with a date of rank (DOR) of 2 Oct 94.
DOD Financial Management Regulation (DODFMR), Volume 7A, Chapter
30, states that officers may become entitled to an initial uniform
allowance and/or an additional active duty uniform allowance as
reimbursement for the purchase of required uniforms and equipment.
This allowance is not payable if the officer has received an
initial uniform allowance of more than $200 during the current tour
of active duty, or within a period of 2 years before entering on
that tour.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the
case; however, based on evidence presented in this application and
the governing authority, Department of Defense Financial Management
Regulation Volume 7A, Chapter 30, it appears he was paid an initial
clothing allowance less than two years prior to his entry on active
duty, in 1992. As such, he is not entitled to any further uniform
allowance. Therefore, in the absence of persuasive evidence to the
contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the
relief sought in this application.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2008-01132 in Executive Session on 11 February 2009, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael J. Novel, Panel Chair
Ms. Debra M. Czajkowski, Member
Mr. Anthony P. Reardon, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
DD Form 149, dated 14 Mar 08, w/atchs.
MICHAEL J. NOVEL
Panel Chair
Available documentation indicates that he was appointed a second lieutenant, Air National Guard and Reserve of the Air Force on . A National Guard Bureau Office of Inspector General (NGB-IG) investigation was conducted on and concerning the following allegations (Exhibit C). He was not released from active duty on 8 Mar 96 under the provisions of AFI 36-36-3209 (Misconduct), transferred to the Kansas Air National Guard on 2 Apr 96, discharged from the Kansas Air National Guard on 31 Jul...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02755
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02755 INDEX CODES: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be immediately promoted to the Reserve grade of colonel, with a retroactive date of 2006; or, in the alternative, his record be considered by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for promotion to the grade of colonel by the Fiscal...
# DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 97-00442 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: .. of the Departmeat of the Air Force relating to- e corrected to show that he had no other alternative but to mercial travel office (CTO) not under...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In his response, the applicant indicated that he understands that ACP was not designed for members serving in different pay status formats. The available evidence indicates that the applicant terminated his ACP agreement when he left AGR status and became a Traditional Guardsman prior to completing his ACP service commitment. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01077
Since the applicant’s POV did not meet the standards for operations in New Zealand without major modifications, he was entitled to ship the vehicle from his assignment at the time to the CONUS for storage. His private owned vehicle (POV) was erroneously shipped from Japan to New Zealand under the authority of Special Order AA- 1299, dated 7 Aug 03, and is authorized to be reshipped from New Zealand to the appropriate vehicle processing center for storage under the provisions of the Joint...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00080 INDEX NUMBER: 128.10 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The debt of $21, 527.78 he incurred for recoupment of Aviator Continuation Pay (ACP) be voided, deleted from his records, and all amounts previously paid toward this debt be refunded to him. We took notice of...
On 3 January 1992, the Director of Personnel notified applicant that because of her inability to meet her recruiting goals, he was recommending her recruiting tour be terminated for substandard duty performance under the provisions of ANGR 35-03, para 6-5c(4). On 20 March 1992, The Adjutant General notified applicant that after a thorough review of the investigating officer's report and applicant's recommendation for involuntary separation from Full-Time National Guard Duty for substandard...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2009-03964
As a result of her erroneous DOS, she was prematurely considered by the CY10 NGB STFM Board which directed her release from EAD, effective 27 Jan 10. The recommended active duty time required for a master sergeant (E-7) to be granted career status is at least eight years; however, the applicant had only attained three years of total active service at the time of her selection. Nonetheless, we believe the commander’s decision to establish the applicant’s DOS as 27 Jan 10 was reasonable in...
The applicant was progressively promoted to the Reserve of the Air Force and Air National Guard grade of lieutenant colonel (O-5), with a promotion service date (PSD) of 11 Jan 87 and an effective date of 15 May 87. By ANG Special Order AP-124, dated 5 Jun 98, he was promoted to the Reserve of the Air Force and Air National Guard grade of colonel (O-6), with a PSD and effective date of 30 Jun 96. In the applicant’s case, as a colonel (O-6), he could have served to age 60 or 30 years of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00317
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00317 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 29 APRIL 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Record (OSR) be corrected to show his most recent Officer Performance Report (OPR) (20 June 2003 – 19 June 2004) was accepted for file on or before 12 July 2004 and...