Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01009
Original file (BC-2008-01009.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2008-01009
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His service-connected disability, hypertension, be  reevaluated  as  combat-
related in order to  qualify  for  compensation  under  the  Combat  Related
Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The Department of Veterans Affairs  (DVA)  reevaluated  his  disability  and
determined it was the result of Agent Orange exposure.

In support of his request, the applicant provided a personal  statement  and
documentation associated with his CRSC application.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

______________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 12 Mar 57,  the  applicant  contracted  his  initial  enlistment  in  the
Regular Air Force.  He was progressively promoted to  the  grade  of  master
sergeant having assumed the grade effective and with a date  of  rank  of  1
Aug 77.  He was honorably retired on 1 Apr 85.

Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records  reflect  a  combined
compensable rating of 50% for his unfitting conditions.

On 30 Dec 04, he submitted an application for CRSC for hypertension.  On  15
Feb  05,  his  application  was  disapproved  for  lack  of  evidence  of  a
contributing combat-related factor.  He was  subsequently  granted  service-
connection by the DVA for  diabetes  mellitus  and  renal  involvement  with
systemic  disease.   On  22  May  08,  his  diabetes  mellitus   and   renal
involvement with systemic  disease  process  was  approved  for  CRSC.   The
hypertension was again denied.  There was  no  evidence  to  show  that  his
hypertension was the direct result of  armed  conflict,  hazardous  service,
instrumentality of war, or simulating war.

______________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD states the applicant's medical  condition
does not the meet the mandatory criteria for  compensation  under  the  CRSC
program.  For hypertension to qualify for CRSC,  it  must  be  secondary  to
diabetes mellitus contracted due to exposure to Agent Orange or  presumptive
to prisoner of war internment, and this must be  stated  in  the  applicable
Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision.  The DVA rating decision dated  6 Aug
85 notes he received medication for hypertension  in  1981  and  the  rating
decision dated 25 Jun 07 reflects he was diagnosed  with  diabetes  mellitus
in November 2006.

APFC/DPSD's complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

______________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13  Jun
08 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this office  has
received no response.


______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  The Board majority believes the  available
evidence of record does not support a  finding  that  the  service-connected
medical condition the applicant believes is combat-related was  incurred  as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,  in
the performance of duty under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through  an
instrumentality of war; and, therefore, does not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC  Act.   The  Board  majority  agrees  with  the  opinion  and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and  adopts
its rationale as the basis for their conclusion that the applicant  has  not
been the victim of an error or injustice.  In the  absence  of  evidence  to
the contrary, the Board majority finds  no  compelling  basis  to  recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.

______________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:

A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of  error  or  injustice
and recommends the application be denied.

______________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2008-
01009 in Executive Session on 19 Aug 08, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

                 Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
                 Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member
                 Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member

By majority  vote,  the  Board  recommended  denying  the  application.  Mr.
Markiewicz voted to grant the  relief  requested  but  does  not  desire  to
submit  a  Minority  Report.   The  following   documentary   evidence   was
considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Feb 08, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSD, dated 22 May 08, w/atchs.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Jun 08.





                                        THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                        Chair








AFBCMR BC-2008-01009




MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD
                      FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR)

SUBJECT:  AFBCMR Application of.

      I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the
recommendation of the Board members.  A majority found that applicant had
not provided substantial evidence of error or injustice and recommended the
case be denied.  I concur with that finding and their conclusion that
relief is not warranted.  Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that
the application be denied.

      Please advise the applicant accordingly.




                                        JOE G. LINEBERGER
                                        Director
                                        Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-03850

    Original file (BC-2005-03850.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 August 1980, he was relieved from active duty in the grade of technical sergeant and retired from the Air Force on 1 September 1980, having served 20 years and 13 days on active duty. Available DVA records reflect a combined compensable rating of 80% for his unfitting conditions. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03158

    Original file (BC-2006-03158.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03158 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 APR 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions , diabetes mellitus, coronary artery bypass, circulatory condition, glaucoma, and hypertension, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00321

    Original file (BC-2005-00321.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His arteriosclerotic heart disease is a direct result of his diabetes caused by exposure to Agent Orange. His records reveals a medical examination, dated 8 Jul 02, which indicates his heart condition is secondary to his hypertension. His health problems relate directly to his diabetes.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | bc-2003-04145

    Original file (bc-2003-04145.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-04145 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 Jun 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, hypertension and coronary disease, be assessed as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat-Related Special Compensation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-02056

    Original file (BC-2008-02056.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-02056 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, migraine headaches, be reevaluated as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. He submitted a application for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03250

    Original file (BC-2005-03250.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 Dec 71, the Air Force PEB recommended that the removed from the TDRL and returned to active duty. For this condition to qualify for CRSC, it must be specifically granted by the DVA as presumptive to Agent Orange exposure. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03916

    Original file (BC-2008-03916.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DVA award was 50 percent, his CRSC award was 40 percent with Special Monthly Compensation. In this respect, it appears that while the DVA increased his combined service-connected disability rating to 50 percent, the particular disability that has been determined combat-related remains rated at 40 percent. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00888

    Original file (BC-2008-00888.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00888 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, arteriosclerotic heart disease be reevaluated as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. We agree with the opinion and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01818

    Original file (BC-2008-01818.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD states the applicant requested his coronary artery bypass be considered combat related. For his coronary artery bypass to qualify for CRSC, it must be either secondary to diabetes mellitus contracted by exposure to AO herbicides or presumptive to Prisoner of War (POW) internment, and this must be so stated in the applicable DVA Rating Decision. ________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: The applicant be notified that the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02923

    Original file (BC-2007-02923.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His service-connected medical condition of the nervous system (occipital headaches), hypertension, intervertebral disc syndrome (cervical) and neurology of the middle radicular nerve group (left arm) be reevaluated under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Program in order to qualify for compensation. In support of his request, the applicant provided documentation associated with his CRSC application. Available DVA records reflect a combined compensable rating of 100% for...