RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03285
INDEX CODE: 110.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be changed to reflect a medical retirement with at least a 40
percent disability rating.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He appealed the formal Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) decision to discharge
him with a 20% disability rating without medical benefits to the Secretary
of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC). He was fit enough to score 90
percentile on his physical fitness test and with pain management he was
able to do his job. He did not decline surgery; this reported claim by the
SAFPC is completely inaccurate and detrimental to his care. His legal
counsel also concluded SAFPC made an error and didn't appear to follow the
facts. His counsel stated even though SAFPC’s decision is incorrect, he
does not have the right or authority to contact SAFPC on their mistake.
His official medical records indicate he was under the care of a back
specialist who deemed surgery necessary. He fought through the MEBs and
appeals asking to have surgery and be reevaluated or granted medical
benefits via retirement to provide for his family. The inaccurate decision
from SAFPC puts his family in a position of hardship and places him in a
severely injured state. Without insurance he cannot continue pain
management treatment and cannot have the necessary surgery to correct his
line of duty injury.
In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal letter,
memorandums, AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended disposition of USAF
Physical Evaluation Board, documents extracted from his medical records and
other documentation associated with his request.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 17 February 2005 the applicant was commissioned in the Regular Air
Force.
On 3 April 2007, he underwent an MEB due to chronic low back pain with
radiculopathy, associated with degenerative disc disease of the lumbosacral
spine.
On 2 May 2007 the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) reviewed his
case and recommended discharge with severance pay with a 20% disability
rating.
He requested a hearing with the Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB).
On 29 June 2007, he appeared, with counsel, before the FPEB. The FPEB
recommended discharge with severance pay with a disability rating of 20%.
The FPEB noted that he wanted to suspend his case pending fusion surgery.
He submitted a rebuttal to SAFPC requesting he be returned to duty to
pursue corrective surgery. SAFPC considered the merits of the request, but
learned he reportedly declined to pursue possible surgical treatment of his
chronic back pain. On 20 August 2007, SAFPC concurred with the disposition
recommended by both boards to discharge him with severance pay with a
disability rating of 20%.
On 1 October 2007 he was discharged in the grade of first lieutenant. He
served two years, seven months and 15 days on active duty.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSD recommends denial. DPSD states the fact that a person may have a
medical condition does not mean the condition is unfitting for continued
military service. To be unfitting, the condition much be such that it
alone precludes the member from fulfilling their military duties. If the
Board renders a finding of unfit, the law provides appropriate compensation
due to premature termination of their career. Further, it must be noted
the USAF disability boards must rate disabilities based on the member's
condition at the time of evaluation; in essence a snapshot of their
condition at that time. It is the charge of the Department of Veteran
Affairs (DVA) to pick up where the Air Force must, by law, leave off.
Under Title 38, Veterans’ Benefits, the DVA may rate any service-connected
condition based upon future employability or reevaluate based on changes in
the severity of the condition. This often results in different ratings by
the two agencies.
The complete DPSD evaluation is at exhibit C.
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends partial approval. The Medical
Consultant states when considering the totality of the applicant's case, to
include his established intent to complete definitive treatment, the
probability the MEB was conducted prematurely, and the qualifying range of
motion measurement conducted by an Air Force Physical Therapist, the
Medical consultant recommends granting his relief. However, such relief
should be in the form of placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List
(TDRL) with a 40% disability rating. Thus while the TDRL is not utilized
for the purpose of forestalling a plan or future treatment measure, the
Medical Consultant opines this is the best way to resolve any real or
perceived injustices in his case, by allowing him to complete the care that
was planned for him and to allow an appropriate period of post-operative
recovery; to be followed by completing of the necessary medical assessment.
The complete Medical Consultant evaluation is at exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant responded stating the Air Force would not allow him to fix
his back while on active duty. His doctor stated “After a review of the
discography done on October 9, 2006, the patient will require interbody
fusion surgery.” The decision to operate was made prior to his separation
from the Air Force yet the chief of flight medicine and medical group
commander refused to allow the corrective action to happen. He does not
understand why the discography information was not made available to his
doctor prior to 4 July 2007 or why the letter was not included in his
official medical records. He agrees with the determination to place him on
TDRL with treatment and benefits until a final evaluation can be made after
corrective surgery/nerve studies have been made available. He asks for the
40% disability percentage to be raised to 60% on the basis of “may require
surgery" to “will require interbody fusion surgery" as stated in the
additional evidence he has provided. He will obviously be incapacitated
while corrective surgery takes place and recovery happens. This proves
beyond any doubt that corrective surgery is necessary due to the line of
duty injury from October 2005. He looks forward to a full recovery and
returning to active duty service in whatever capacity the Air Force
determines after being reevaluated under the TDRL guidelines.
His complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit F.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice warranting corrective action. In this
respect, as noted by the BCMR Medical Consultant, it appears that the
applicant's MEB may have been conducted prematurely, and therefore, he may
not have been given the appropriate consideration in effecting his
discharge from the Air Force. Accordingly, we agree with the assessment of
the BCMR Medical Consultant and recommend his records be corrected to
reflect placement on the TDRL with a 40% disability rating. Therefore, we
recommend that his records be corrected as indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
Pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to
APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. He was not discharged from active duty with entitlement to
severance pay on 1 October 2007, rather on 2 October 2007 his name was
placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List with a diagnosis of
intervertebral disc syndrome, with a VASRD Code of 5243, and a compensable
rating of 40%.
b. On 2 October 2007, he declined spouse and children coverage under
the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and his spouse concurred with his election.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-
03285 in Executive Session on 24 July 2008, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. B. J. White-Olson, Panel Chair
Mr. Garry G. Sauner, Member
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2007-03285 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 October 2007, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSD, dated 2 January 2008.
Exhibit D. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 30 April 2008.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 May 2008.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 14 May 2008, w/atch.
B. J. WHITE-OLSON
Panel Chair
[pic]
Office of the Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR BC-2007-03285
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed
that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that:
a. He was not discharged from active duty with entitlement to
severance pay on 1 October 2007, rather on 2 October 2007 his name was
placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List with a diagnosis of
intervertebral disc syndrome, with a VASRD Code of 5243, and a compensable
rating of 40%.
b. On 2 October 2007, he declined spouse and children coverage under
the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and his spouse concurred with his election.
JOE G.
LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force
Review Board Agency
[pic]
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00238
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was removed from the Temporary Disability Retirement List (TDRL) on account of conditions that the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) claimed were resolved, although he continues to receive treatment. On 9 November 2004, the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) reevaluated the applicant’s case and recommended discharge with severance pay with a rating of 10%. After reviewing the case, SAFPC...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00428
The applicant's records reflect in April 2002, he self-referred to Life Skills due to an anxiety while flying. The complete AFPC/DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit C. The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicants request for a hearing by the FPEB and change in his disability rating. The complete BCMR Medical Consultant's evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04590
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04590 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 20 percent disability rating he received for his diabetes be increased to 40 percent and he be medically retired with a 40 percent disability rating. The USAF disability boards must rate disabilities based on the service members condition at the time...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02228
The IPEB noted that she had declined further “ablation surgery.” On 9 March 2006, the applicant concurred with the findings and recommended disposition of the IPEB. The complete AFBCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ 5 APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF THE ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 15 Feb 13, by letter, the applicant amended her request and now ask to be medically retired instead of being returned to duty. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-01816
The FPEB recommended permanent disability retirement with a 10% disability rating. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: In response to the AFPC/DPSD evaluation, counsel responds that the applicant’s rating has to be based on the rating criteria, in other words, the DVA rating chart, rather than pulling a percentage of out thin air and applying it to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02083
In support of his request, the applicant provided copies of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DVA rating/decision letter, evaluation boards findings, and MEB summary and medical records. The fact that a person may have a medical condition does not mean that the condition is unfitting for continued military service. The complete AFPC/DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00371
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the application be denied. Following DPPD’s assessment, they conclude the applicant was treated fairly throughout the military Disability Evaluation System (DES) process, that he was properly rated under federal disability guidelines at the time of his evaluation, and that he was afforded the opportunity for further review as provided by federal law and policy. As...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04632
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04632 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His disability rating from the Air Force of 10 percent be increased to 30 percent and he receive a permanent retirement. Had the DVA initially evaluated him at 30 percent or if the FPEB waited until the DVA processed his appeal, the increased...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04738
His records be corrected to show that he was retired for physical disabilities and provided a 100 percent combined compensable disability rating rather than medically discharged with severance pay. On 31 Aug 07, the Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) reviewed the case file and recommended a combined compensable disability rating of 20 percent. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-04143
The Medical Consultant states the applicant's request for a change from a 30 percent to a 100 percent disability rating with medical retirement must be considered in view of the medical evidence available at the time of separation from active duty service and release from the TDRL. Hence, the Medical Consultant identifies no medical basis for the recommendation to retroactively assign a 100 percent disability rating for the applicant's ulcerative colitis. After thoroughly reviewing the...