RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02866
INDEX CODE: 135.00, 136.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 MAR 2007
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
It appears the applicant is requesting a Reserve retirement with
pay and benefits.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The compilation of creditable time served is being determined by
two different methods between the Air Reserve Personnel Center
(HQ ARPC) and the Army Board for Correction of Military Records
(ABCMR), resulting in the forfeiture of compensation and benefits.
The ABCMR determined that she held a commissioned officer status in
the Army Reserve from 24 Oct 66 thru 6 Nov 91. In addition to
active duty time served, her years of service were used to
determine her promotion to the rank of major. Due to her
continuous status for 28 years, she was involuntarily separated
from the active duty Air Force because of maximum time in grade and
service. If the time is creditable towards promotion and discharge
why isn’t it creditable towards retirement?
In support of her appeal, applicant submitted copies of discharge
certificates, dated 30 Oct 68, 6 Nov 91, and 31 May 05; a
certificate of the oath of office, effective 24 Oct 66; extracts
from the ABCMR case file and other supporting documentation.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant was commissioned a second lieutenant, Reserve of the
Army, Army Nurse Corps, on 24 Oct 66. She was ordered to active
duty on 31 Oct 66. She was released from active duty and
transferred to the Army Reserve on 30 Oct 68, where she remained
until her discharge on 6 Nov 91.
On 7 Nov 91, she was commissioned a captain, Reserve of the Air
Force, Nurse Corps. She was ordered to active duty on 4 Dec 91, in
the grade of captain. Following a review of her records, she was
awarded 13 years, 6 months, and 21 days of constructive service
credit based on her status as a commissioned officer in the Army
Reserve from 24 Oct 66 to 5 Nov 91. Consequently, her EAD orders
were amended to reflect an EAD grade of major. On 23 Nov 94, she
was released from active duty and assigned to the Non-obligated
Nonparticipating Ready Personnel Section (NNRPS). She was
reassigned from NNRPS to the Inactive Status List Reserve Section
(ISLRS) on 24 Nov 96.
On 31 May 05, she was honorably discharged from all appointments in
the Air Force, in the grade of major. She completed 38 years,
7 months, and 7 days of honorable commissioned service, but was
credited with only five years of satisfactory federal service
towards retirement.
Applicant’s date of birth is 14 May 45. IAW Title 10, USC, Section
14509, applicant’s mandatory separation date (MSD) was established
as 31 May 05.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ ARPC/DPP considered this application and recommended denial.
They provided the following analysis of the circumstances
surrounding the applicant’s case:
a. In order to establish eligibility for Reserve retired pay
under the provisions of Title 10, USC, Section 12731, a member must
complete at least 20 years of satisfactory service. A review of
the applicant’s records indicates she completed 38 years, 7 months,
and 7 days of honorable federal service as of 3 May 05, the day she
was honorably discharged from the US Air Force Reserve (USAFR).
However, only five years of this time was satisfactory service
creditable toward retired pay eligibility. Honorable service is
the total years of service including active, inactive, regular and
Reserve. It includes satisfactory years as well as years during
which the member did not participate sufficiently to earn
satisfactory years.
b. In order to be credited with a year of satisfactory
service, a member must participate and accrue at least 50 points in
a specific one-year period. The applicant’s record contains no
documentation of active Reserve participation other than the two
periods she served on active duty, 31 Oct 66 through 30 Oct 68, and
4 Dec 91 through 23 Nov 94. The applicant’s record shows that
following her release from active duty on 23 Nov 94, she was
assigned to the Non-obligated Nonparticipating Ready Personnel
Section (NNRPS). She was reassigned from NNRPS to the Inactive
Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) on 24 Nov 96. While assigned
to ISLRS, members are not eligible to participate in point gaining
activities for retention/retirement. She was honorably discharged
on 31 May 05, under the provisions of Title 10, U.S.C., Section
14509, because she had reached her MSD.
The applicant’s service in the US Army Reserve (USAR) was
considered and counted when her record was audited by the USAFR to
determine retirement eligibility. However there is a difference
between total years service which includes constructive service
credit (CSC) used to determine grade, and satisfactory service
which is used to determine retirement eligibility. The applicant
was given CSC for the time she was in the USAR; this allowed her to
be placed on EAD with the USAFR in 1991, in the grade of major.
Only satisfactory service may be used to determine retirement
eligibility. Her satisfactory service was correctly credited as
5 years.
She is not eligible for Reserve retired pay, or any benefits
associated with retired pay, under the provisions of Title 10,
U.S.C., Section 12731, since she did not complete 20 years of
satisfactory service.
A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit
C.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant reiterated her original arguments that if her creditable
service time was good towards promotion, extension of serviceable
time in grade and cause for involuntary separation, would it not
then be considered for retirement?
Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Applicant
contends that if her time served can be credited for promotion and
discharge, then why not retirement. However, after careful
consideration of the documents submitted in support of her appeal
and the evidence of record, it appears she has been properly
credited with all of the active and inactive service creditable
under the governing instructions and laws at the time of her
separation. The Board noted the applicant was discharged on her
MSD of 31 May 05, IAW with Title 10, USC, Section 14509, and was
credited with 38 years, 7 months, and 7 days of honorable service.
However, only five of those years were creditable towards a Reserve
retirement. Title 10, USC, Section 12731 requires a minimum of
20 years of satisfactory federal service to be eligible for a
Reserve retirement. In order to be credited with a year of
satisfactory service, a member must participate and accrue at least
50 points in a specific one-year period through active duty,
inactive duty participation, or Extension Course Institute courses.
Other than the two periods applicant served on active duty,
31 Oct 66 to 30 Oct 68, and 4 Dec 91 to 23 Nov 94, there is no
evidence of any active Reserve participation. Consequently, she
was discharged after over 38 years of commissioned service with
only five of those years being satisfactory years towards
retirement. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Reserve Personnel Center and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an error or injustice. Based on the
foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
___________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2005-02866 in Executive Session on 29 November 2005, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael J. Novel, Panel Chair
Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Sep 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ ARPC/DPP, dated 13 Oct 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Oct 05.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 28 Oct 05, w/atchs.
MICHAEL J. NOVEL
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01524
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommends that partial relief be granted indicating that it would be in the interest of justice to correct the applicants records to reflect her 1 Oct 11 MSD was waived and that she was retained in the Reserve until 1 Apr 12,...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00385
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00385 INDEX CODE: 102.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 AUG 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her corrected Reserve appointment date of 1 Apr 87 be changed to 6 Apr 93. She was appointed as a Reserve of the Air Force in the grade of captain with a promotion service date...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03417
He was deferred for the second time and his MSD was established as 1 Mar 14. The applicant completed 24 years of commissioned service in May 08. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02600
His time retained in the Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) from 19 Aug 96 to 30 Sep 02 be removed in order to adjust his mandatory separation date (MSD) of 1 Dec 14. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. As a result, he would...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02836
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02836 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The applicant requested an extension to her MSD to allow her the opportunity to complete 20 years of satisfactory service for retirement. In this respect, we note the applicant timely requested an extension of her 31 Dec 12 MSD in Mar 12;...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02687
Her TFCSD is 8 May 82 and her MSD was computed as 1 Jun 2010 based on the first day of the following month in which she completed 28 years of commissioned service. Even though she did not participate in a unit or individual Reserve program for 3 years and 11 months from 22 Oct 92 to 18 Sep 96, that time still accounts for her TFCSD of 8 May 82 and cannot be adjusted because she did not participate. Had she selected the SSB, she would also have been transferred to the NNRPS on 22 Oct 92 as...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05389
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05389 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The time he was retained in the Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) from 31 Dec 97 through 22 Nov 05 be removed. He was also permanently retained in the Inactive Reserve and his record was not reviewed in accordance with...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05680
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05680 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The extra/erroneous time he was retained in the Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) be added to his Mandatory Separation Date (MSD). The Air Force OPR has addressed the issues presented by the applicant and we are in agreement with...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00148
DPT states the applicant’s record should be corrected to show a break in service from 16 Oct 99 through 9 Jan 06. By removing the additional ISLRS time, her TFCSD, Total Years Service Date (TYSD), and Pay Date would also be adjusted by 6 years, 2 months and 24 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that: discharged from...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00428
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant separated from the Regular Air Force 31 Aug 04. When he met his second Reserve promotion board and was not selected for promotion, he incurred a MSD.