RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02436
INDEX CODES: 100.05, 100.06
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “4” (Ineligible to enlist or
reenlist in the USAF) be changed to “1.”
His Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) of 56750 be changed to 56750A.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The RE code and AFSC on his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United
States Report of Transfer or Discharge, are not correct.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides an expanded statement
and extracts from his military personnel records.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant’s available military personnel records indicate he enlisted
in the Regular Air Force on 3 Jul 57 for a period of four years in the
grade of airman basic.
He was released from active duty on 30 Jun 61 under the provisions of
AFR 39-14 (Convenience of the Government). He was credited with 3
years, 11 months, and 28 days of total active service.
Applicant’s DD Form 214, Block 32 (Remarks), indicates he was assigned
an RE code of “4,” and that he retained a Primary AFSC of 56750.
On 1 Jul 61, he enlisted in the Air Force Reserve. He was honorably
discharged on 2 Jul 63.
On 12 Sep 70, he enlisted in the Missouri Air National Guard (ANG).
He reenlisted and continued to serve in the ANG until 28 Oct 80, at
which time he was honorably discharged under the provisions of ANGR 39-
10. He was credited with 16 years, 1 month, and 16 days of total
service for pay.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating a review of the applicant’s
records failed to determine any error or injustice as it pertains to
his RE code. He did not provide any proof the RE code is in error;
therefore, it is their position the RE code is correct. Further, if
the applicant has served 12 years in the ANG and has been employed
with the United States Army, they do not believe there is a viable
reason to change the code without solid proof the code is actually in
error.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAC recommends denial noting the applicant provided an NGB Form
22, Report of Separation and Record of Service in the Air National
Guard of Missouri, reflecting he had prior service in the AFSC of
56750A. They indicated that effective 29 Feb 60, which was prior to
the applicant's separation on 30 Jun 61, the AFSC of 56750A was
deleted as an authorized identifier in the military classification
structure. Therefore, the entry on his DD Form 214 that he retained
the AFSC of 56750 was correct.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAC evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 30
Nov 07 for review and response within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office (Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of
an error or injustice. No evidence has been presented which shows to
our satisfaction the applicant’s RE code of “4” was inappropriately
assigned. Further, it does not appear it barred him from military
service in a Reserve component. We also are not persuaded by the
evidence presented that the applicant’s AFSC of 56750 was erroneous.
In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of sufficient evidence to
the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the
relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2007-02436 in Executive Session on 21 Feb 08, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
Mrs. Lea Gallogly, Member
Mr. Joseph D. Yount, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Jul 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 18 Sep 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAC, dated 31 Oct 07.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Nov 07.
WAYNE R. GRACIE
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03437
On 3 August 1981, the applicant submitted a request to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting to have his under honorable conditions (general) discharge upgraded to honorable and to change his reenlistment code (RE). AFPC/DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPAC recommends the applicant’s request for correction of Item 11 on his DD Form 214 be denied. Based on the documentation in the applicant's records, it appears his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Skills Management Branch, AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed this application and indicated that a review of applicant’s military personnel records revealed an AF Form 418 (Selective Reenlistment/Noncommissioned Officer Status Consideration), dated 25 Jul 88, denying her reenlistment. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03355
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03355 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Good Conduct Medal. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the applicant’s request for award of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03755
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 19 Aug 03 for a period of six years. On 27 Aug 05, applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, by reason of “Unsatisfactory Performance,” and was issued an RE code of 2C. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03272
He executed his reenlistment 6 February 2006, almost 120 days before the announced effective date of the SRB. Additionally, he is not eligible to execute a six- year reenlistment as it exceeds the authorized term of enlistment authorized by the Air Force. In this regard, the applicant is requesting that he be authorized a Zone A, Multiple 2, SRB as reflected on his 6 February 2006 reenlistment contract.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02400
Based on the corrected TAFMSD of 30 Mar 85, he would have been eligible for the requested SRB when he reenlisted on 1 May 00. He enlisted in the Regular Air Force (RegAF) on 25 Jul 85 and is presently serving on active duty in the grade of senior master sergeant (SMSgt) (E-8). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00628
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00628 INDEX CODE: 128.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted the Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) in his new career field (3E0X2) rather than the SRB from his previous career field (3E5X1). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00841
On 2 Feb 07, applicant was discharged in the grade of airman basic, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, by reason of misconduct, with service characterized as under honorable conditions (general) and was issued an RE Code of 2B (involuntarily separated with a general discharge). The Board acknowledged the applicant’s high motivation to re-enter military service; however, the Board denied an upgrade of his RE code. As noted in the statement of facts his RE code has been administratively...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02008
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02008 INDEX CODE: 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 29 DEC 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The test scores from cycle 07E7 be removed from his records and that he be allowed to retest. They state if the applicant felt the environmental condition of the classroom was...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03558
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03558 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) code of "2K" be changed to "3A" so he can enlist with the Navy Reserve. AFPC/DPSOA's complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial and states based on the documentation on file in...