Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03558
Original file (BC-2007-03558.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                 DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-03558
            INDEX CODE:  110.02
      XXXXXXX                COUNSEL:  NONE

                                  HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His reentry code (RE) code of "2K" be changed to "3A" so he can enlist
with the Navy Reserve.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He completed bootcamp and graduated from  technical  training  school.
His performance and conduct was good, however he  was  under  a  great
deal of stress due to his parents' divorce while he attended technical
training school.

In support of  the  application,  the  applicant  submits  a  personal
statement and a copy of his DD Form 214,  Certificate  of  Release  or
Discharge from Active Duty.

Applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 25 June 1997 for  a
period of six years.  On 7 January 1998, he was  discharged  from  the
Air  Force  under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36-3208,   Administrative
Separation of Airmen, chapter 5, section D, paragraph 5.22.2.,  Entry-
Level  Performance  or  Conduct  and  was  issued  an  uncharacterized
separation.  The specific reason for this action was that he  received
an Article 15 for failure to go on 10 December 1997 and on 3  December
1997, he was permanently decertified from  the  Personnel  Reliability
Program (PRP). He received an  RE  code  of  2K,  “Has  been  formally
notified by the unit commander of initation of involuntary  separation
action.” He served 6 months and 12 days on active duty.

_________________________________________________________________




AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOA  recommends  denial  and  states  there  is  no  error   or
injustice. The applicant was involuntarily discharged based  on  entry
level performance and conduct. Additionally, the Board  should  direct
the applicant's RE code  of  "2K"  be  corrected  to  more  accurately
reflect  his  involuntarily,  entry   level   separation   to   2C   -
"Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or  entry  level
separation without characterization of service."

AFPC/DPSOA's complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial and states based on the documentation  on
file in the master personnel records,  the  discharge  was  consistent
with  procedural  and  substantive  requirements  of   the   discharge
relation. The discharge was within the  discretion  of  the  discharge
authority. The applicant did not submit any evidence or  identify  any
errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge process.

AFPC/DPSOS's complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
11 April 2008 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date,
this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate
the existence  of  an  injustice  warranting  partial  relief.  After
careful review of the evidence of record, it appears the  applicant’s
separation was in compliance with the governing  instruction  and  we
find no evidence to indicate his separation from the  Air  Force  was
inappropriate. However, we note that the Air Force office of  primary
responsibility has opined  that  the  present  RE  code  of  "2K"  is
incorrect.  His RE code of 2K should  be  changed  to  "2C"  to  more
accurately reflect his involuntary, entry level  separation.  In  all
other respects, the discharge appears to be in  compliance  with  the
governing guidelines and we find no additional evidence  to  indicate
that his separation from the Air Force was inappropriate.  Therefore,
we recommend his records be corrected only to  the  extent  indicated
below.

_________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that at  the  time  of  his
discharge on 7 January 1998, he was issued a Reenlistment  Eligibility
(RE) code of "2C."

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2008-
03558 in Executive Session on 29 May 2008 under the provisions of  AFI
36-2603:

      Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
      Mr. Vance E. Lineberger, Member
      Mr. Garry G. Sauner, Member

All members  voted  to  correct  the  records,  as  recommended.   The
following documentary evidence was considered:


     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 26 Oct 07, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 15 Jan 08.
     Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 13 Feb 08.
     Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Apr 08.




                                  WAYNE R. GRACIE
                                  Panel Chair



AFBCMR BC-2007-03558




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:

      The pertinent military records of  the  Department  of  the  Air
Force relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that  at  the
time of her discharge on 7 January 1998, he was issued a  Reenlistment
Eligibility (RE) code of "2C."
.







     JOE G. LINEBERGER

     Director

     Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00309

    Original file (BC-2008-00309.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 16 April 2007, the applicant was notified by her commander that he was recommending her discharge from the Air Force for Chronic Sinusitis, which existed prior to service (EPTS). AFPC/DPSOA's complete evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial and states, in part, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. AFPC/DPSOS's complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00555

    Original file (BC-2012-00555.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00555 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. When the discharge authority approved the applicant’s involuntary discharge with honorable character of service, her RE Code should have been changed to “2C” Involuntarily Separated with an Honorable Discharge or Entry Level Separation Without...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00841

    Original file (BC-2008-00841.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 Feb 07, applicant was discharged in the grade of airman basic, under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, by reason of misconduct, with service characterized as under honorable conditions (general) and was issued an RE Code of 2B (involuntarily separated with a general discharge). The Board acknowledged the applicant’s high motivation to re-enter military service; however, the Board denied an upgrade of his RE code. As noted in the statement of facts his RE code has been administratively...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01380

    Original file (BC-2009-01380.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Examiner’s Note: The Air Force office of primary responsibility has identified the applicant’s correct reentry code should have been 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C &...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00516

    Original file (BC-2009-00516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00516 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2C-Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without service characterization be changed to allow him to enlist in the National Guard. The HQ AFPC/DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00251

    Original file (BC 2009 00251.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00251 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 5 June 1998, the applicant submitted a personal statement admitting his sexual tendencies and requested to be discharged from the Air Force. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01359

    Original file (BC-2010-01359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 Dec 08, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force for entry-level performance or conduct. DPSOS states that based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge to include the service characterization was appropriately administered and within the discretion of the discharge authority. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03352

    Original file (BC 2007 03352.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03352 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncharacterized entry-level separation be changed and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code “2C” be changed so that he may reenlist into the Armed Forces. In support of his application, the applicant has...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03385

    Original file (BC-2007-03385.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03385 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code “2K” (Has been formally notified by the unit commander of initiation of involuntary separation action) be changed to a "1." The AFBCMR Medical Consultant’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01107

    Original file (BC-2009-01107.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 Feb 09, the applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to recommend his discharge from the Air Force for entry level performance and conduct in accordance with AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen . Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the service characterization, was appropriately administered and within the discretion of the discharge authority. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...