SECOND ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00960
INDEX CODE: 106.06, 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code, separation program designator (SPD)
code, and the narrative reason for her 2005 discharge be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Similar appeals were considered and denied by the Board on 21 June 2006 and
12 November 2006. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances
surrounding the applicant’s separation and the rationale for the earlier
decisions by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F and the
Addendum to the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit H.
In a DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge from the Armed
Forces of the United States, dated 27 April 2007, the applicant requests
reconsideration. She states that her narrative reason for separation
should state failure to progress in training due to dissatisfaction with
her job. She completed Phase I of her technical training; however could
not complete Phase II. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments,
is at Exhibit I.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
In earlier findings, we determined there was insufficient evidence to
warrant any corrective action. After thoroughly reviewing the additional
documentation submitted in support of this appeal and the evidence of
record, we do not believe the applicant has overcome the rationale
expressed in our previous decisions. We considered the applicant’s request
for a waiver to reenlist; however, based on her medical evaluations and
diagnosis of an Adjustment Disorder, we do not believe a waiver is
warranted. Therefore, in view of the above, and in the absence of evidence
to the contrary, we find no basis upon which to recommend favorable
consideration of the applicant’s request.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without
a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon
the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with
this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2005-
00960 in Executive Session on 19 February 2008, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Ms. B J White-Olson, Panel Chair
Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member
Ms. Debra K. Walker, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit H. Addendum to Record of Proceedings
dated 29 November 2006, w/atchs.
Exhibit I. DD Form 293, dated 27 April 2007, w/atchs.
B J WHITE-OLSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00960-2
She was issued an RE code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge or an entry level separation), and an SPD code of JFX, which correlates to a narrative reason of discharge for Personality Disorder. On 21 Jun 06, the Board agreed with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant’s determination that the case should be denied because her Adjustment Disorder placed her and the Air Force at an unacceptable risk for a recurrence of her symptoms should she be exposed again to the stressful...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00960
After basic training, the applicant selected the Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) Surgical Service Apprentice and was assigned to Sheppard AFB for Surgical Service Phase I training. On 8 Sep 04, the commander concurred, noting the applicant’s inconsistencies with respect to her fear of blood, lack of desire to become a surgical technologist, and stated goal to become a midwife. On 28 Jan 05, the discharge authority directed the applicant’s honorable discharge for Conditions that Interfere...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03144
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03144 INDEX CODE: 131.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her record be corrected to show credit for 14 days of military service since her date of rank (DOR) was two weeks into her active duty career. According to Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2604, her DOR is considered to be...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-1996-02696-2
We find no evidence of error in this case and after thoroughly reviewing the documentation that has been submitted in support of his appeal, we do not believe he has suffered from an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1998-02973-2
(See the Record of Proceedings, dated 30 Jan 89, with attachments, at Exhibit G). (See the Addendum to the Record of Proceedings, dated 28 Jan 04, with attachments, at Exhibit H). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01129
Members of the Board, Ms. BJ White-Olson, Ms. Glenda H. Scheiner, and Mr. Mark J. Novitski, considered this application on 24 May 2007. BJ WHITE-OLSON Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFRC/A1B, dated 17 May 07, w/atchs AFBCMR BC-2007-01129 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-03123
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03123 INDEX CODE: 108.04 COUNSEL: DAV HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 Apr 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be placed on the permanent disability retired list effective 17 Sep 05. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2006-00456-2
However, since no new and relevant evidence has been provided, we find the request does not meet the criteria for reconsideration. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented did not meet the criteria for reconsideration by the Board; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application....
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01980
His Date of Separation (DOS) be changed to reflect the correct DOS. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 6 April 2005, the applicant submitted an application to the Board requesting he be given a SRB in conjunction with his 13 October 2004 reenlistment. For an accounting of the facts surrounding his previous request and the rationale of the Board's earlier decision, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F. On 10 May 2007, the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02095A
__________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Pursuant to the Board’s request, AFPC/DPPRS provided an information only evaluation of the applicant’s request for reconsideration of her case. AFPC/JA notes that this individual fell under the Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program. __________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 7 June 2006,...