Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00960-2
Original file (BC-2005-00960-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                                 ADDENDUM TO
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:                 DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-00960
                                        INDEX CODE: 106.06, 110.02
      XXXXXXX                     COUNSEL:  NONE

                                        HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

In the applicant’s  request  for  reconsideration,  she  requests  her
Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) and Separation Program Designator  (SPD)
codes be changed, as  well  as  the  narrative  reason  for  her  2005
discharge.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant, with some college and working experience as  a  medical
receptionist, enlisted in the Regular  Air  Force  on  6 Apr  04.  She
selected  the  Air  Force  Specialty  Code  (AFSC)  Surgical   Service
Apprentice, completed Surgical  Service  Phase  I  training,  and  was
subsequently assigned to Andrews AFB on 2 Aug 04 to complete Phase II.
 Student records for the period 5-12 Aug 04 indicate she had expressed
anxiety about seeing a lot of blood; she finally indicated she did not
want to remain in the Air Force if she could not choose another  AFSC.
On 26 Aug 04, the course medical director recommended the  applicant’s
disenrollment for unsuitability, without retention.  On 8 Sep 04,  the
commander  concurred,  noting  the  applicant’s  inconsistencies  with
respect to her fear of blood, lack of  desire  to  become  a  surgical
technologist, and stated goal to become a midwife.

A mental health evaluation, dated 3 Jan 05,  diagnosed  the  applicant
has having Adjustment Disorder with depressed mood so severe that  her
ability to function in any medical AFSC was significantly impaired and
mission readiness could be compromised when deployed.   The  level  of
dysfunction warranted separation.

On  28 Jan  05,  the  discharge  authority  directed  the  applicant’s
honorable  discharge  for  conditions  that  interfere  with  military
service, mental disorders, without probation and rehabilitation (P&R).
 The applicant was honorably discharged in the  grade  of  airman,  on
7 Feb 05, after 10 months and 2 days of active duty.  She  was  issued
an RE code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable  discharge
or an  entry  level  separation),  and  an  SPD  code  of  JFX,  which
correlates  to  a  narrative  reason  of  discharge  for   Personality
Disorder.

On 21 Jun 06, the Board agreed with the  AFBCMR  Medical  Consultant’s
determination that the case should be denied  because  her  Adjustment
Disorder placed her and the Air Force at an unacceptable  risk  for  a
recurrence of  her  symptoms  should  she  be  exposed  again  to  the
stressful environment of military service.

For an accounting of  the  facts  and  circumstances  surrounding  the
applicant’s separation and the rationale of the  earlier  decision  by
the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F.

By letter dated 18 Oct 06, the applicant requests  reconsideration  of
her appeal and forwards a personality  test  result  with  a  clinical
psychologist’s conclusions and summary, and a  recommendation  from  a
clinical social worker.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is  at  Exhibit
G.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  noted  the  social  worker’s
statement and the 13 Oct 06 psychological  evaluation,  which  reports
the applicant currently resides with her family, has a large group  of
friends, and is capable of serving in the military.  This evaluation’s
background description of her service and training while  in  the  Air
Force appears somewhat disingenuous in that it does not fully  reflect
her true situation at the time, as fully documented  in  her  military
records.  The applicant’s initial evaluations were conducted while she
was in the actual stressful environment of the military,  whereas  the
subsequent evaluations were performed after that environment of stress
had been removed.  Although the applicant may be functioning well  now
with the support of her family and friends, we remain skeptical of her
ability to perform effectively once she  is  again  placed  under  the
rigors  of  military  life.    Given   her   previously   demonstrated
difficulties, retuning the applicant to the  demands  of  active  duty
would place her, her fellow members, and the Air Force at unacceptable
risk.  We therefore find no compelling basis on which to overturn  our
previous conclusion that this application should be denied.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission  of
newly  discovered  relevant  evidence   not   considered   with   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 12 November 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:

                 Ms. B. J. White-Olson, Panel Chair
                 Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member
                 Ms. Debra K. Walker, Member

The following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2005-00969 was considered:

   Exhibit F.  Record of Proceedings, dated 5 Jul 06, w/atchs.
   Exhibit G.  Applicant's Letter, dated 18 Oct 06, w/atchs.




                                   B. J. WHITE-OLSON
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00960

    Original file (BC-2005-00960.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    After basic training, the applicant selected the Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) Surgical Service Apprentice and was assigned to Sheppard AFB for Surgical Service Phase I training. On 8 Sep 04, the commander concurred, noting the applicant’s inconsistencies with respect to her fear of blood, lack of desire to become a surgical technologist, and stated goal to become a midwife. On 28 Jan 05, the discharge authority directed the applicant’s honorable discharge for Conditions that Interfere...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03297

    Original file (BC-2005-03297.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her request, the applicant provided a Mental Health Evaluation, dated 28 Jun 06, from the Life Skills Support Center, 90 MDOS/SGOH, F.E. Warren AFB, WY, recommending a waiver for reenlistment because her adjustment disorder had resolved and “there was no evidence of a mental health condition or a personality disorder at this time.” The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. As personality disorders are frequently exacerbated by stress, they may...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02691

    Original file (BC-2007-02691.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02691 INDEX CODE: 111.02 COUNSEL: JOSEPH W. KASTL HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 28 Jun 05 through 22 May 06 be declared void and removed from her records. It seems that the applicant had been accused of spousal abuse during an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00675

    Original file (BC-2008-00675.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDEP recommends denial noting the applicant filed an appeal through the Evaluation Reports Appeals Board (ERAB) but was denied relief because the board was not convinced the report was inaccurate based on the evidence provided by the applicant. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIDEP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-03123

    Original file (BC-2005-03123.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03123 INDEX CODE: 108.04 COUNSEL: DAV HEARING DESIRED: Not Indicated MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 Apr 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be placed on the permanent disability retired list effective 17 Sep 05. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01931

    Original file (BC-2004-01931.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 Feb 99, the applicant’s squadron commander notified her he was recommending her discharge from the Air Force for conditions that interfere with military service, specifically, mental disorders. The applicant was discharged on 4 Mar 99 for “Personality Disorder.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of the applicant’s request. Exhibit C. Memorandum, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 18 May 05.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02414

    Original file (BC-2006-02414.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02414 INDEX CODE: 111.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 FEB 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His enlisted performance report closing 13 Sep 05 be voided. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPEP reviewed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00358

    Original file (BC-2006-00358.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00358 INDEX CODE: 107.00, 128.14 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 AUG 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be awarded an additional 10% retirement pay for receiving the Airman’s Medal (AmnM), awarded 17 Jun 95 for heroism. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00654

    Original file (BC-2005-00654.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    She also denied significant legal or financial problems, drug abuse, and occupational or school problems. However, after reviewing the applicant’s request and the evidence of record, we find the narrative reason for her separation, i.e., personality disorder, to be inaccurate. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02718

    Original file (BC-2004-02718.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02718 INDEX CODES: 100.05, 111.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 Mar 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: By amendment, his promotion eligibility be reinstated so his test scores for the 03E6 cycle can be graded; he receive promotion consideration for cycle 04E6; his training status code...