RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01874
INDEX CODE: 115.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 DEC 08
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He receive reinstatement into Specialized Undergraduate Flying Training
(SUPT), an age waiver, or as an alternative, entry into Undergraduate Pilot
Training (UPT).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
A failed elimination check-ride was the result of issues beyond his control
leading to his elimination from SUPT. Applicant also blames academic exam
failures on unfair tests and changes in testing media (computer-aided exams
vice hand-written exams) as contributing factors to his poor SUPT
performance.
He states he has made sacrifices that very few others have made. With his
passion of still wanting to fly, he has found that he is too old to apply
for the Navy and Marines. Private aviation is his only option, however,
with school loans, he is unable to afford to do so and still be able to pay
off loans. He further states he is willing to go to whatever lengths to be
allowed back into UPT.
In support of his request, the applicant provided a personal statement and
documentation extracted from his military personnel record.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on extended active duty in the grade of
first lieutenant effective and with a date of rank of 1 June 2007.
Applicant entered SUPT with Class 07-11 at Vance AFB, OK on 14 June 2006
and was eliminated from training for flying deficiency in October 2006.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AETC/A3F recommends denial. AETC/A3F states the applicant tells a
compelling story from his perspective. While ambition is admirable, this
alone cannot sustain an individual in a program where standards are high
and consistent performance is required. Primary training is a dynamic,
fast-paced training program. Many students who do not meet standards and
lack potential are eliminated. The training was IAW established command
policies and syllabus guidance. Based on AETC/A3F’s examination, there is
no evidence of error or injustice substantiating reinstatement.
The AETC/A3F complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 27 July 2007, the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review
and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has
received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. After a thorough review of the
evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are of the opinion
that relief is not warranted and the applicant has not provided any
evidence which would lead us to believe otherwise. His contentions are
duly noted; however, the detailed comments provided by the office of
primary responsibility (OPR) adequately address these allegations.
Therefore, we are in agreement with the comments and recommendation of the
OPR and adopt its rationale as the basis for our decision that the
applicant has not been the victim of either an error or injustice. In view
of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially
add to our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request
for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a
personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-
01874 in Executive Session on 28 Aug 07, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. James W. Russell III, Panel Chair
Mr. Elwood C. Lewis III, Member
Mr. Mark J. Novitski, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Jun 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AETC/A3F, dated 23 Jul 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Jul 07.
JAMES W. RUSSELL III
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02211
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02211 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Education and Training Command (AETC) Form 126A, Record of Commanders Review Action, be amended to include the remarks of the Eliminating Authority recommending him for consideration for reinstatement into Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT) at...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC 2009 00424
Had he been allowed to attend IFS he would have had a better understanding of what it would take to be successful in SUPT. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AETC/A3F recommends correcting the applicants AETC Form 126A Section I, Initiating Authority block, to read Flying Deficiencies C4389 pre-Mid-Phase failure to progress rather than Pre-Solo Elimination Check. A3F states that if the applicant took time to read the orders, he...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03830
After reviewing his training records, as required by AETCI 36-2205, the 47 Operations Group Commander recommended to the 47 TFW/CC that the applicant be eliminated from SUPT due to Manifestations of Apprehension (MOA) on 2 November 2000. AETC/SGPS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AETC/DOF recommends the applicant not be reinstated into any flying training course. AETC/DOF complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02063
After only three training sorties, rather than tell his flight commander the complete situation, he simply told him he could not go fly, resulting in referral to the commander's review process. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AETC/DOF recommended denial. In any case, the elimination letter provided by AFPC shows MOA as the elimination reason.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-03844
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03844 INDEX CODE: 100.07 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 JUNE 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He was wrongfully eliminated from Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training (SUPT) and request he be reinstated in SUPT. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00937
This exam is required for all students being considered for elimination to ensure students are “medically qualified at the time of any non-medical disenrollment.” As a result, the applicant was to be reinstated into training following a Medical Hold status to resolve the medical issue. At the time of her elimination, there was a policy allowing up to 6 months in Medical Hold before students would be considered for elimination. Then following the 3-month Medical Hold, the Flight Surgeon...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00606
The new procedures and AETC Form 139, Record of Commander's Review Action (Undergraduate Pilot Training) now allows for other options and leaves the return to UPT up to the discretion of the UPT commander. Had it been in use at the time of his elimination from pilot training, the AETC Form 139, Section III could have been used for his situation. The form states, "If recommended for elimination, the student should be considered for reinstatement in this course at a later date due to...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00556
Reason for his elimination from training shown on the AF Form 475, and AETC Forms 126A, and 240-5 Summary of Record of Training is Drop-on- Request (DOR). AETC/A3F complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPEP recommends approval to correct the 12 December 2002 training report if the AETC Form 126A and AETC 240-5 forms are corrected as recommended by AETC/A3F. NOVEL Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2006-00556 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00833
He was withdrawn from training and entered into the Commander’s Review (CR) process. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AETC/A3F recommends the application be denied, and states, in part that a student eliminated for self-initiated reasons, before, during or after course completion are ineligible for further flight training. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00099
When applying for the AFROTC Potential Pilot Qualified (PPQ)/Potential Navigator Qualified (PNQ) Categorization Board, HQ AETC received the wrong paperwork (Flying Class I (FCI)/Commissioning Physical instead of the Department of Defense Medical Examination Review Board (DoDMERB) physical) from AFROTC, which may have contributed to his nonselection for pilot training. If provided the chance to compete against his peers during the FY 06 primary selection board, he would have been selected...