RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00556
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 AUGUST 2007
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Air Force Form 475, Education/Training Report and Air Training Command
(ATC) Form 126A, Record of Commander’s Review Action be corrected to read
"Elimination due to medical concerns."
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He respectfully requests the AFBCMR correct an error on his AF Form 475 and
AETC 126A. His AF 475, "Education/Training Report" dated 26 Dec 02, in
section 2, block 2, block 4 incorrectly reflects his reason for elimination
from training as "Drop on Request." His AETC 126A, "Record of Commanders
Review Action," dated 12 Dec 02, section I, also incorrectly reflects the
reason for his elimination from training as "Drop on Request" and as a
result, Section III automatically requires that he "not be considered for
Undergraduate Navigator Training or Air Battle Management Training." He
requests the Board consider the enclosed information and approve his
request.
In support of his request, he submits a personal letter, letters of
recommendation, medical statements, IG Request, AETC Form 126A, Record of
Commander’s Review Package, Training Reports, Feedback Worksheets, AETCI 36-
2205, Medical Management Requirements, and AETCI 48-102, Medical Management
of Undergraduate Flying Training Students.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant is currently in the Regular Air Force in the grade of Captain.
Applicant entered JSUPT at Vance AFB, OK with Class 03-12 in July 2002.
After 39.6 hours in the T-37 primary phase, applicant was eliminated from
training.
a. Reason for his elimination from training shown on the AF Form 475,
and AETC Forms 126A, and 240-5 Summary of Record of Training is Drop-on-
Request (DOR).
b. Applicant's training records indicate he had two pre-sole
airsickness episodes. Training records provided indicated he was seen by
the Flight Surgeon's office after each airsickness episode. Records have no
mention of any prescribed medication, relaxation or rotation-
desensitization (Barany chair) training.
c. Applicant states after his sixth airsickness episode with "no
medical help in sight", facing the prospect he would be held-over two
classes because he was behind his classmates on the training timeline-he
felt he had no option but to self-initiate his elimination from (DOR).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AETC/A3F recommends approval and states there is reasonable doubt
applicable policies, instructions and management procedures were not
followed in this case. Applicant's AF Form 475, AETC Forms 126A, and AETC
240-5, should be changed to show the elimination cause as "administrative
for lack of adaptability". Change the Form 126A recommendation to "consider
for reinstatement at a later date" and show the applicant as eligible to
apply for Undergraduate Navigation training or Air Battle Manager training.
As long as the applicant still desires to fly and remains otherwise
eligible, he should be provided another SUPT opportunity. Because of the
intervening time interval, he should reenter training from the beginning of
the course.
AETC/A3F complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPPEP recommends approval to correct the 12 December 2002 training
report if the AETC Form 126A and AETC 240-5 forms are corrected as
recommended by AETC/A3F. If the decision is to grant relief, section 4 of
the 12 December 2002 training report should be corrected to read
"Administrative elimination for lack of adaptability.
AETC/A3F provided an advisory concerning the proper procedures Vance
officials should have followed. A3F specifically recommend AF Form 475,
AETC Form 126A and AETC 240-5 be changed to show the elimination as
"administrative for lack of adaptability.
The 12 December 2002 training report is accurate due the member's current
documentation showing the member dropped on request. However, based on
AETC/A3F's finding and recommendation, AFPC/DPPPEP agrees the report should
be corrected if the AFBCMR grants the member relief.
AFPC/DPPPEP complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 5
May 2006 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this
office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice that would warrant restoring the
applicant's eligibility for flying status. Based on the evidence
presented, it is apparent prescribed airsickness management procedures were
not followed in this case. Medication was available to help the applicant
during his pre-solo flights, but not prescribed. The Board notes that there
is reasonable doubt applicable policies, instructions, and management
procedures were followed in this case. Therefore, in view of the
foregoing, and in an effort to offset any possibility of an injustice, we
agree with the recommendations of the offices of primary responsibility to
correct the applicant's records as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. AETC Form 126A, Record of Commander's Review Action, Section I,
reflects "ADMINISTRATIVE FOR LACK OF ADAPTABILITY"; "Section III, reflects
"BE CONSIDERED FOR REINSTATEMENT IN THIS COURSE AT A LATER DATE" and "BE
CONSIDERED FOR UNDERGRADUATE NAVIGATOR TRAINING OR BATTLE MANAGEMENT
TRAINING."
b. AF Form 475, Section II, item 4, reflects ADMINISTRATIVE FOR LACK
OF ADAPTABILITY."
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2006-
00556 in Executive Session on 19 July 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Michael J. Novel, Panel Chair
Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member
Mr. Reginald P. Howard, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-00556 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Feb 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AETC/A3F, dated 3 Apr 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPAO, dated 23 Apr 06.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 May 06.
MICHAEL J. NOVEL
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2006-00556
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that:
a. AETC Form 126A, Record of Commander's Review Action,
Section I, reflects "ADMINISTRATIVE FOR LACK OF ADAPTABILITY"; "Section
III, reflects "BE CONSIDERED FOR REINSTATEMENT IN THIS COURSE AT A LATER
DATE" and "BE CONSIDERED FOR UNDERGRADUATE NAVIGATOR TRAINING OR BATTLE
MANAGEMENT TRAINING."
b. AF Form 475, Section II, item 4, reflects ADMINISTRATIVE
FOR LACK OF ADAPTABILITY."
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00606
The new procedures and AETC Form 139, Record of Commander's Review Action (Undergraduate Pilot Training) now allows for other options and leaves the return to UPT up to the discretion of the UPT commander. Had it been in use at the time of his elimination from pilot training, the AETC Form 139, Section III could have been used for his situation. The form states, "If recommended for elimination, the student should be considered for reinstatement in this course at a later date due to...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01440
The course is a grueling three- day training in airsickness management for student pilots. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AETC/DOF recommends the application be denied. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that his package proves his desire and willingness to complete any program that he may be selected for in the future.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00222
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00222 INDEX CODE: 126.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 23 JUL 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 16 August 2004 Training Report be removed from his records and he be reinstated into Joint Undergraduate Navigator Training (JUNT). If the applicant had been in an Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | bc-2006-03308
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was disadvantaged as a Naval officer entering an Air Force (AF) program because he had not completed the same pre-Joint Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training (JSUPT) his AF classmates had attended. They further recommend that if the requested relief is granted, his AETC Form 126A, Record of Commander’s Review Action, be changed to read “student should be considered for reinstatement in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02211
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02211 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Education and Training Command (AETC) Form 126A, Record of Commanders Review Action, be amended to include the remarks of the Eliminating Authority recommending him for consideration for reinstatement into Undergraduate Pilot Training (UPT) at...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00833
He was withdrawn from training and entered into the Commander’s Review (CR) process. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AETC/A3F recommends the application be denied, and states, in part that a student eliminated for self-initiated reasons, before, during or after course completion are ineligible for further flight training. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00434
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00434 INDEX NUMBER: 115.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His AETC Form 126A be changed to show that he be considered for reinstatement into Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training (SUPT) at a later date and that he be considered for Undergraduate Navigator Training...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00937
This exam is required for all students being considered for elimination to ensure students are “medically qualified at the time of any non-medical disenrollment.” As a result, the applicant was to be reinstated into training following a Medical Hold status to resolve the medical issue. At the time of her elimination, there was a policy allowing up to 6 months in Medical Hold before students would be considered for elimination. Then following the 3-month Medical Hold, the Flight Surgeon...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03492
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03492 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The statement he may not apply to any flight training in the future, be removed from the Air Force IMT 174, Record of Counseling, dated 8 May 08, prepared on him. At the time of his disqualification, the only flight training pipelines were...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04758
Neither commander indicated that deviations from the instruction were authorized or made for needs of the Air Force. Instead, these commanders confirm that AETCI 36-2205, Volume 4, dated 1 June 2009, was closely followed throughout the training Air Force. Instead, A3F follows with another general assertion that chain-ofcommand oversight and management is essential to the aircraft assignment process and that the wing commander makes the final decision on the best match of student skill,...