Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01835
Original file (BC-2007-01835.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-01835
            INDEX CODE:  131.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  14 DEC 08

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Officer Selection Brief  (OSB)  for  the  Calendar  Year  2006C  (CY06C)
Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB)  be  corrected  to  reflect
his correct assignment history and that he receive Special  Selection  Board
(SSB) consideration for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by  the
CY06C selection board.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His Air Force Officer Pre-selection Brief  (OPB)  was  inaccurate  when  the
CY06C  Lieutenant  Colonel  Board  convened.   In  the  assignment   history
section, three of his duty titles did not match his actual  duty  titles  on
his  Officer  Performance  Reports   (OPRs).    The   generic   duty   title
“Intelligence  Officer”  did   not   accurately   reflect   the   level   of
responsibility  commensurate  with  the  actual  duties  he  performed.   He
believes these errors misled the board members and was an overall  detractor
which possibly led to his nonselection to lieutenant colonel.

In support of his request, the applicant provided documents  extracted  from
his military personnel record.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant is currently serving on extended  active  duty  in  the  grade  of
major with a date of rank of 13 May 2003.

The applicant was considered and not selected for promotion to the grade  of
lieutenant colonel by the CY06C (28 November 2006) Lieutenant Colonel CSB.

The OSB prepared for the CY06C selection board reflected  a  duty  title  of
“Intelligence Officer” for the 10 February 2001, 16 June 2004, and  10  July
2005 entries in the Assignment History section.

AFPC/DPPPO has advised that the Assignment  History  of  the  OSB  has  been
updated to reflect the duty titles  of  Assistant  Director  of  Operations,
effective 10 February 2001; Commander, ISR OPS  Flight  effective,  16  June
2004; and Chief, J2 Current Operations effective 10 July 2005.


_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPO recommends denial.  DPPPO  states  central  boards  evaluate  the
entire selection record to include the promotion recommendation form,  OPRs,
officer effectiveness reports,  training  reports,  letters  of  evaluation,
decorations, and data on the OSB.  The board  members  assess  whole  person
factor such as job performance, professional qualities,  depth  and  breadth
of experience, leadership and academic and professional  military  education
when rendering their decision.  As such, DPPPO does  not  believe  that  the
contested assignment history errors on his OSB caused his  nonselection  for
promotion to lieutenant colonel.  Furthermore, the OPR contains the  correct
duty title and organization so the board members were able to take  it  into
consideration in the promotion selection process.  The applicant  failed  to
exercise reasonable diligence in ensuring his record was accurate  prior  to
the CSB.

The DPPPO complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 10 August 2007, the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for  review
and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date,  this  office  has
received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant’s
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we  are  not
persuaded by the evidence presented that  corrective  action  is  warranted.
In support of his appeal the applicant provided a copy of his OPB which  was
generated on  11  July  2006,  reflecting  the  duty  titles  the  applicant
contends are in error.  We took note that the selection  board  in  question
convened over three months after the OPB was generated.  However,  we  found
no evidence showing he made reasonable effort to correct  his  record  prior
to the convening of the board, as  it  was  his  responsibility  to  do  so.
Furthermore, we agree with the Air Force office  of  primary  responsibility
that the duty titles reflected on his  OPRs  provided  the  selection  board
members adequate representation of his duties  and  responsibilities  during
the rating periods.  Evidence has not been provided by the applicant,  which
would persuade us that the information  contained  on  his  OSB  caused  his
record to be so inaccurate and misleading that the  board  members,  charged
with the discretionary authority to score his records, were unable  to  make
a reasonable judgment  concerning  his  promotability  in  relation  to  his
peers.  Therefore, in the absence of persuasive evidence  to  the  contrary,
we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or injustice; the application  was  denied  without  a
personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon  the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not  considered  with  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2007-
01835 in Executive Session on 12 September 2007,  under  the  provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Michael J. Novel, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Richard K. Hartley, Member
                 Mr. Reginald P. Howard, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 23 May 2007, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPO, dated 24 July 2007, w/atchs.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 August 2007.




                       MICHAEL J. NOVEL
                       Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03941

    Original file (BC-2006-03941.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2006-03941 INDEX CODE: 100.05 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 June 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be considered by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Calendar Year 2006A (CY06A) (13 Mar 06) (P0506A) Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Central Selection...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02164

    Original file (BC-2007-02164.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also requests his duty title in the Assignment History Section on his Officer Selection Brief (OSB) be corrected. He responded that he was Intermediate Developmental Education (IDE) designee for the 2007 school year (his OSB reflects SELECT 2008); his duty title "DLI Student" should have been on the Duty Qualification History Brief (DQHB) that was considered by the Student MLR Board in Jul 06; his duty title "IDE Student" was missing from his OSB that met the CY06C CSB, and the 5 Sep 98...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00970

    Original file (BC-2007-00970.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00970 INDEX CODE: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 SEP 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Brief (OSB) be corrected to reflect “Joint Specialty Officer (JSO)” in the Joint Reporting Category (JRC) and his corrected record be considered by...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01844

    Original file (BC-2007-01844.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s respective OPR and Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) contained the correct duty title as HH-60G Instructor pilot/Assistant Director of Operations, which the board members reviewed and took into consideration in evaluating his record. The DPPPO complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that despite several attempts to correct his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01670

    Original file (BC-2006-01670.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01670 INDEX CODE: 131.03 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 December 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be considered by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY04B (P0504B) (12 July 04) Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Central Selection Board (CSB) with the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02653

    Original file (BC-2006-02653.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02653 INDEX CODE: 131.00 XXXXXXX XX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 MAR 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by special selection board (SSB) for the CY06A (13 Mar 06) (P0506A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01894

    Original file (BC-2007-01894.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO recommends the AFBCMR grant SSB consideration with inclusion of the updated deployment history on his OSB and removal of the discrepancy report. Notwithstanding our recommendation above, we agree with AFPC/DPAOM6 that the applicant did attempt to correct his duty history and deployment history prior to meeting the Board, and therefore should be afforded SSB consideration with the corrected OSB. Therefore, the Board recommends that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01907

    Original file (BC-2007-01907.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01907 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Brief (OSB) prepared for the Calendar Year 2006C (CY06C) Colonel Central Selection Board be corrected to show his assignment to Al Udeid AB, Qatar, in the “Deployment History” block and he be considered for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00714

    Original file (BC-2006-00714.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is the officer’s responsibility to ensure the accuracy of his record at AFPC prior to the board convening date, not after he has been nonselected for promotion. The Air Force had a duty to present to the promotion board an accurate record. Applicant contends that his records were not fairly assessed because the Air Force failed to correct his OSB after proper notification of the errors, and the citation for the MSM 2/OLC was missing from his OSR, which prevented his record from being...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02389

    Original file (BC-2003-02389.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    His senior rater at the time was responsible for providing promotion recommendations to the selection board. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting correction to the applicant’s Officer Selection Brief (OSB) and Officer Selection Record (OSR) and Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel. It is further recommended that the applicant’s corrected record be considered for...