RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00680
INDEX CODE: 110.00, 112.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 SEP 08
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code and separation code be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He desires to reenlist in the service. He believes he would be a powerful
asset to the Air Force.
In support of his request, the applicant provided a personal statement and
documentation extracted from his military personnel record.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 16 March 2004. On 5 October
2005, applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to recommend
that he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFPD 36-32
and AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.26.3 – unsatisfactory performance.
Specifically, on or about 12 July 2005, he failed the 2T3X1A Career
Development Course test, for the second time as documented on AFIADL Form
9. His score of 53% failed to meet the minimum passing score of 65%. As a
result of his second test failure, he was withdrawn from training. On or
about 28 April 2005, he failed the 2T3X1A Career Development Course test as
documented on AFIADL Form 9. His score of 40% failed to meet the minimum
passing score of 65%. He was advised of his rights in this matter and
acknowledged receipt of the notification on that same date. After
consulting with counsel the applicant elected to submit statements on his
own behalf. In a legal review of the case file, the staff judge advocate
found the case legally sufficient and recommended that he be discharged
with an honorable discharge without probation and rehabilitation. On
27 October 2005, the discharge authority concurred with the recommendations
and directed that he be discharged with an honorable discharge. Applicant
was discharged on 2 November 2005. He served 1 year, 7 months and 17 days
on active duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. DPPRS states based on the documentation on
file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The
discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority.
Applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices
that occurred in the discharge processing. He provided no facts warranting
a change to his reenlistment eligibility code or separation program
designator (SPD).
The DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial. DPPAE states they found no evidence of error
or injustice; nor did the applicant submit any evidence.
The DPPAE complete evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the evaluation and states he desires to reenlist in
the service and retrain into a new career field. He states he will be a
powerful asset to the Air Force. He has skills that can meet many jobs. He
is now a U.S. citizen and can fulfill any job anywhere in the world.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an injustice. Notwithstanding the fact that the separation
and reenlistment codes issued at the time of the applicant's separation
were in accordance with the applicable regulations, we believe that based
on the particular circumstance of this case, he should be given an
opportunity to request a waiver to serve in the Air Force. Whether or not
he is successful will depend on the needs of the service and our
recommendation in no way guarantees that he will be allowed to return to
the Air Force or any other branch of service. Accordingly, we recommend
his records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 2 November 2005 he was separated
under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 1.2 (Secretarial Authority)
with a separation code of JFF and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of
3K.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-
00680 in Executive Session on 13 June 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Panel Chair
Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member
All members voted to correct the records. The following documentary
evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Mar 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 22 Mar 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 12 Apr 07.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 May 07.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, undated, w/atchs.
MICHAEL V. BARBINO
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2007-00680
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to XXX, be corrected to show that on 2 November 2005 he was
separated under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 1.2 (Secretarial
Authority) with a separation code of JFF and a reenlistment eligibility
(RE) code of 3K.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01079
He believes there is no reason he should not be allowed to reenlist into another service component. DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 27 April 2007 for review and comment within 30 days. JAMES W. RUSSELL, III Panel Chair DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC [pic] Office Of The Assistant...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00512
On 16 March 2004, he was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen (entry-level performance and conduct) and was issued an uncharacterized discharge. Therefore, we recommend that his records be corrected to the extent indicated below. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 16...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03336
_________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 22 March 2000, he was separated under the provisions of AFR 36-3208, paragraph 1.2 (Secretarial Authority) with a separation code of JFF and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 3K. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Dec 02, w/atchs....
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03000
She served 2 years, 2 months and 13 days of active service. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE stated that the Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” is correct. However, after reviewing the applicant’s records, the Board believes the narrative reason for separation and her current RE code are somewhat harsh.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01689
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01689 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her to join the Armed Forces. In support of her request, the applicant submitted a personal statement, and a letter of...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00242 INDEX NUMBER: 110.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 2C be changed to an eligible code so that he can reenlist and continue in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00437
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00437 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2C” be changed to allow his enlistment into either the Army or Air Force. On 19 June 1998, he received an uncharacterized entry-level separation under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Fraudulent Entry into...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01415 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His discharge be upgraded and the reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, reviewed the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-01423 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncharacterized, entry-level separation be changed to reflect that he was honorably discharged for Convenience of the Government. The Medical Consultant further recommends that the Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01106
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied, and states, in part, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, the Board is of the opinion there was no deliberate deception on the...