Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00982
Original file (BC-2007-00982.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-00982
            INDEX CODE:  107.00
            COUNSEL:  NOT INDICATED

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  29 SEP 2008


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her records be corrected to reflect her date of rank (DOR)  as  7 June
2003.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her DOR is incorrect based on her college graduation  date  of  17 May
2003 and her commissioning date of 7 June 2003.

In support of her request, the applicant submits College  Transcripts,
Reserve of the Air Force Appointment Letter, and a copy  of  her  Data
Verification Brief.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant entered the Reserve Officer Training Corp (ROTC)  on  15
September 1999.  She graduated on 2 May 2003, and was  commissioned  a
second lieutenant in the Reserves on 7 June 2003.   She  reported  for
active duty at Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii, on  5  July  2003.   She
currently serves in the grade of first lieutenant.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPAOR recommends denial.   DPPAOR  states  the  initial  DOR  is
computed by crediting ½ day for each day that  the  officer  performed
active-but not active duty-commissioned service in the grade in  which
he or she entered the active duty list.  The  applicant  was  credited
with 14 days from 7 June 2003, date commissioned and 4 July 2003,  day
prior to entering active duty.  The 14 days were subtracted from  date
entered active duty, 5 July 2003.  Her DOR was established as 21  June
2003,  and  service  credit  was  awarded  accurately  IAW  Air  Force
Instruction 36-2604.

The DPPAOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
27 April 2007, for review and comment within  30  days.   As  of  this
date, this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice.  Evidence has not  been  provided
which would lead us to believe that the rules of  the  applicable  Air
Force Instruction,  which  implement  the  law,  were  inappropriately
applied or that she was denied  rights  to  which  she  was  entitled.
Therefore, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of  the  Air
Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of
an error or injustice.  In the absence of persuasive evidence  to  the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought  in
this application.

_______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2007-
00982 in Executive Session on 20 June 2007, under  the  provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
                 Mr. Wallace F. Beard Jr., Member
                 Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Mar 07, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Available Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAOR, dated 16 Apr 07, w/atchs.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Apr 07.




      THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
      Chair





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03144

    Original file (BC-2006-03144.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03144 INDEX CODE: 131.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her record be corrected to show credit for 14 days of military service since her date of rank (DOR) was two weeks into her active duty career. According to Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2604, her DOR is considered to be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00988

    Original file (BC-2003-00988.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00988 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her date of rank (DOR) to the grade of staff sergeant be changed from 26 November 2002 to 10 December 2001. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. She was discharged from the NH ANG and enlisted in the Regular Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02283

    Original file (BC-2005-02283.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFPC/DPPAOR indicated the applicant was given credit for all of her active duty time and that her TAFMSD was correct (Exhibit D). EPRs are a record of performance while serving in the military, whether on active duty or in the Air Force Reserve. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00852

    Original file (BC-2007-00852.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00852 INDEX CODE: 111.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 SEPTEMBER 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The AF Form 475, Education/Training Report rendered on her for the period 18 Jun 95 through 12 Apr 96, be corrected to reflect “Distinguished Graduate...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00717

    Original file (BC-2003-00717.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPPAOR’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO reviewed this application in order to determine the applicant’s promotion eligibility. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPPO, dated 5 May 03. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 May 03.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00392

    Original file (BC-2007-00392.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 January 2003, the applicant received an LOC for failure to obey an order or regulation. DPPAE states there is no evidence in the applicant’s record to support that the RE code she received is incorrect or that it created an injustice. Exhibit F. Letter of Recommendation, dated 3 May 07.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02140

    Original file (BC-2006-02140.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    After reviewing her military records, they returned it on 10 August 2006, as there was no justification to change her service dates. She submitted a Standard Form 180 sometime in 1984 “to prepare for review of discharge”, and stated on her form that her dates of active service were from 25 October 1983 to 6 January 1984. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2006-02140 in Executive Session on 11 July...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00640

    Original file (BC-2003-00640.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 21 January 1985 and was released from active duty on 5 April 1988 and transferred to the Reserves of the Air Force on 6 April 1988 and discharged on 3 February 1999. The evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 30 May 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00603

    Original file (BC-2003-00603.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00603 INDEX CODE: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) to first lieutenant be adjusted from 4 July 2002 to 4 April 2001. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAMF2 states that the applicant completed his Master’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01841

    Original file (BC-2007-01841.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her date of rank (DOR) be adjusted to reflect her previous active duty Reserve service. The complete DPPAOR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant responded stating that because of misinformation from her recruiter, she was not able to apply for a waiver or exception to policy concerning Total Active Federal Military Service "TAFMS" requirements to her rank or...