RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00768
INDEX CODE: 108.07
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 14 SEP 08
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His service-connected medical condition, tinnitus, be assessed as combat
related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related
Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He believes his tinnitus is the result of performing flight line duties.
In support of his request, the applicant provided a personal statement and
documentation associated with his CRSC application.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant having served 24 years, 2 months, and 5 days on active duty
retired on 3 December 1992 in the grade of staff sergeant. He served as an
Administration Specialist.
Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records reflect a combined
compensable rating of 10% from 26 December 2002 for his unfitting
conditions.
His CRSC application was disapproved on 20 December 2006 based upon the
fact that his service-connected medical condition was determined not to be
combat-related.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. DPPD states in the applicant’s initial
application, he indicated that he believes his tinnitus is due to the noise
exposure he experienced while serving as a radar mechanic. When
considering hearing conditions, the CRSC Board can only approve them if
there is clear evidence that the individual was exposed to prolonged,
routine combat-related noise, and that the condition began while the
individual was still in the service.
The VA Rating Decision, dated 25 July 2003, states the applicant’s “service
medical records are negative for tinnitus…” No other evidence was provided
to indicate this condition began while the applicant was on active duty.
Although the applicant’s conditions have been service-connected by the VA,
CRSC criteria require documentation to support a qualifying combat-related
event or events as the direct cause of the disability. Simply performing
duties in an armed conflict or exercise environment, performing maintenance
on a military aircraft/vehicle, or performing hazardous service (flight
crew, EOD, pararescue, etc.) does not automatically qualify an individual
for CRSC.
The DPPD complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant states that from the summer of 1955 until the winter of 1956,
he served as a flight line radar mechanic at Yokota AFB, Japan. He worked
on the airborne intercept radar installed in the F-86D jet fighter. He
worked eight hour shifts as a black box mechanic doing pre-flight and post-
flight checks on the F-86D radar sets (E-4, 5 & 6 series systems,
manufactured by Hughes Aircraft Company). Noise levels were extremely high
as the fighter jets taxied in and out of the area on their way to and from
the runway. During one of his visits to the VA he complained about
tinnitus or ringing in the ears; however, there is no record of his
complaint included in his VA records. After 50 years passage of time, his
memory of those early active duty years in the Air Force may not be
complete, but he does recall his complaint to the medical personnel at
Yokota AFB of ear problems which persist to this day.
Applicant’s complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the available
evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical
condition the applicant believes is combat-related was not incurred as the
direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the
performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an
instrumentality of war, and therefore, does not qualify for compensation
under the CRSC Act. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without
a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon
the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with
this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2007-
00768 in Executive Session on 23 July 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member
Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Dec 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 10 Apr 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Apr 07.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 19 Apr 07.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00768
In the absence of a specific traumatic event resulting in significant, documented spine injury, it is impossible to attribute direct causation of degenerative spine disease to aerial flight. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01272
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01272 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 OCT 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, tinnitus and impaired hearing, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01663
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement with nine attachments, his DD Form 214, Statement of Service, Retirement Orders, and other documentation associated with his CRSC application. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 Aug 06 (Exhibit D) for review and comment within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01248
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01248 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 DEC 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, impaired hearing and tinnitus, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03390
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03390 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, neck strain, chronic low back pain, hemorrhoids and impairment of sphincter control, ingrown toenails, sinusitis, tinnitus, and hypertension, be assessed as combat related in order to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-04306
A review of his medical records reveals no record of such injuries, although while stationed at Kadena AB, he injured his back lifting furniture. The Medical Consultant states he asserts his back was injured during a rocket attack in Vietnam either by falling off a helicopter or when a comrade fell on his back seeking shelter. He also asserts his back and knee conditions were caused by his duties during aerial flight.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02790
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02790 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, degenerative arthritis of both hips, hearing loss, and tinnitus, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00203
In order for tinnitus to qualify for CRSC, there must be documentation that clearly shows the condition manifested while in service; however, no evidence of hearing loss or tinnitus was found while he was on active duty. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02593
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02593 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 DEC 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, impaired hearing and tinnitus, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01992
In this letter, the doctor provides his opinion that the applicant’s back condition should be considered combat-related because “These complicated degenerative changes and neurological deficits are an occupational condition secondary to cumulative trauma over twenty years of flying, not from an isolated injury.” The doctor also stated that “applicant’s lumbar spine disease and neurological sequellae are based on a reasonable degree of medical certainty, causally related to flying airplanes...