Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01248
Original file (BC-2005-01248.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-01248
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  15 DEC 06

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His service-connected medical conditions, impaired hearing and tinnitus,  be
assessed as combat related in order to qualify for  compensation  under  the
Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He  was  exposed  to  plenty  of  noise  generated  by  rockets  and  mortar
explosions while in Vietnam.  He was awarded compensation by the  Department
of Veterans' Affairs (DVA) based on his service in  Vietnam.   His  tinnitus
is presumed to be the result of noise exposure in Vietnam.

In support of his request, applicant provided documentation associated  with
his CRSC application.  His complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force  on  15
Jun 53.  He was progressively promoted to  the  grade  of  master  sergeant,
having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank  of  1  May  71.
He served as a Jet Engine Technician.  He voluntarily retired from  the  Air
Force on 31 Jan 77, having served 23 years, 7 months, and 16 days on  active
duty.

Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records  reflect  a  combined
compensable rating of 70%% for his unfitting conditions.

His CRSC application was approved  for  diabetes  mellitus,  rated  at  20%;
paralysis of sciatic nerves, rated at 20% each, paralysis  of  nerve,  right
and left upper extremities, rated at 10%  each;  and  diabetic  retinopathy,
rated at 0%.  His hearing loss and tinnitus were disapproved on  19  Apr  05
based upon the fact  that  the  service-connected  medical  conditions  were
determined not to be combat-related.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD states  in  his  initial  application  he
stated his hearing loss was the result high noise exposure while  performing
duties as a Jet Engine Technician.  He also indicated on  his  DD  Form  149
that he has not been exposed to noise levels since  his  retirement  and  he
believes his injury must have occurred during his many years of service.   A
review of his service and DVA medical records shows no hearing  or  acoustic
trauma while on active duty.  During his retirement physical he  noted  that
he had not suffered from ear, nose or throat trouble, hearing loss, or  head
injury during service.  His hearing  conditions  were  not  granted  service
connection  by  the  DVA  until  14  Mar  05,  nearly  30  years   following
retirement.  Without evidence of in-service hearing  loss  or  tinnitus,  it
cannot be determined that a combat  related  event  led  to  his  conditions
rather than routine causes or his own physical make-up and the normal  aging
process.

The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 20  May
05 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this office  has
received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were  not  incurred  as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,  in
the performance of duty under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through  an
instrumentality of war, and  therefore,  do  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2005-
01248 in Executive Session on 6 Feb 06, under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
      Mr. James W. Russell III, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 8 Apr 05, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 11 May 05.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 May 05.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00321

    Original file (BC-2005-00321.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His arteriosclerotic heart disease is a direct result of his diabetes caused by exposure to Agent Orange. His records reveals a medical examination, dated 8 Jul 02, which indicates his heart condition is secondary to his hypertension. His health problems relate directly to his diabetes.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00732

    Original file (BC-2005-00732.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His CRSC application was disapproved on 19 Aug 04 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to be combat- related. DPPD provided a review of his relevant medical history and states no evidence can be found to indicate any of the claimed conditions were caused by a combat related injury or event. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03866

    Original file (BC-2006-03866.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant believes his Impaired Hearing and Tinnitus were caused by the noise exposure he experienced while performing duties as a senior woodworker. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence that he was awarded the AFCM 3OLC. Nor do we find evidence showing that his records should be corrected to show he was promoted to any grade higher than that currently reflected.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03817

    Original file (BC-2004-03817.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant's service records cannot be located. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his duodenal ulcers, impaired hearing, and tinnitus, are not combat related. His records do show he suffered hearing loss while in service; however, impaired hearing and tinnitus cannot be considered combat related unless incidental to a combat related event or due to documented, continual and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01663

    Original file (BC-2006-01663.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement with nine attachments, his DD Form 214, Statement of Service, Retirement Orders, and other documentation associated with his CRSC application. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 Aug 06 (Exhibit D) for review and comment within 30 days. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00768

    Original file (BC-2007-00768.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA Rating Decision, dated 25 July 2003, states the applicant’s “service medical records are negative for tinnitus…” No other evidence was provided to indicate this condition began while the applicant was on active duty. After 50 years passage of time, his memory of those early active duty years in the Air Force may not be complete, but he does recall his complaint to the medical personnel at Yokota AFB of ear problems which persist to this day. After a thorough review of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04226

    Original file (BC-2003-04226.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time of his retirement physical he denied otoxins, vertigo, or ear fullness and tinnitus, though the physician's impression was bilateral sensory hearing loss on his left ear and conductive deafness on his right ear. His bilateral hearing loss is documented as incurred while on active duty but is not considered to be combat-related. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03641

    Original file (BC-2006-03641.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03641 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 JUN 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, impaired hearing, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. He...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00108

    Original file (BC-2004-00108.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00108 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, impaired hearing, tinnitus, and right knee arthritis, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02593

    Original file (BC-2005-02593.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02593 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 DEC 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, impaired hearing and tinnitus, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation...