RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00627
INDEX CODE: 131.01
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 August 2008
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His record be corrected to show that he was directly promoted to the grade
of lieutenant colonel with a date of rank (DOR) commensurate to those
selected by the CY99B (30 November 1999) (P0599B) Lieutenant Colonel
Central Selection Board (CSB), and consideration be given to the overall
impact of his situation over his career regarding subsequent promotion
boards, professional military education, etc.
His records be corrected to include the Air Force Commendation Medal, First
Oak Leaf Cluster (AFCM)(1OLC) citation in his Officer Selection Record
(OSR) for his above-the-promotion-zone (APZ) CY00A (28 November 2000)
(P0500A) Lieutenant Colonel CSB, that he was directly promoted to the grade
of lieutenant colonel with a DOR commensurate to those selected by the
P0500A Lieutenant Colonel CSB, and consideration be given to the overall
impact of his situation over his career regarding subsequent promotion
boards, professional military education, etc.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The promotion system made a mistake during his in-the-promotion-zone (IPZ)
consideration by the P0599B Lieutenant Colonel CSB. He was advised that he
was passed over because he had spent a lot of time at Fairchild AFB, WA,
which was interpreted as a lack of “breadth of experience”, and as a result
of poorly written Officer Performance Reports (OPRs) from the United States
Air Force Academy (USAFA) – both situations beyond his control. At the
time he was preparing to PCS from Fairchild AFB, a PCS freeze was initiated
by HQ Strategic Air Command due to the budget situation at that time. He
was subsequently chosen for an elite, special duty assignment at the USAFA,
but it was held against him because of the quality of the OPRs, not the
quality of his performance.
The absence of the AFCM (1OLC) in his OSR negatively affected the results
of the P0500A Lieutenant Colonel CSB and, if it had been considered, may
have affected the outcome of this board since he was subsequently promoted
above-the-primary-zone (APZ) to the grade of lieutenant colonel.
In support of his appeal, he has submitted two DD Form 149s, both dated 26
February 2007, two personal statements, both dated 26 February 2007, and
copies of his “As Met” records considered by the CSBs in question.
Applicant’s complete submissions, with attachments, are at Exhibit A and
A1.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
At the time of his application, applicant was serving as the 18th Air
Support Operations Group Deputy Commander, Pope AFB, NC, in the grade of
lieutenant colonel, with a DOR and effective date of 1 April 2003. He was
awarded the AFCM (1OLC) with a close date of 1 June 1999.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPASB recommends denial of the request for direct promotion. However,
they believe the most fair and practical remedy is to grant Special
Selection Board (SSB) consideration by the CY00A (28 November 2000)
(P0500A) Lieutenant Colonel CSB to allow him to include his AFCM (1OLC)
citation in his OSR.
Applicant has three nonselections for promotion to the grade of lieutenant
colonel by the P0599B, P0500A, and CY01B (5 November 2001) (P0501B)
Lieutenant Colonel CSBs. He was selected for promotion to the grade of
lieutenant colonel APZ by the CY02B (12 November 2002) (P0502B) CSB, and
promoted with an effective date/DOR of 1 April 2003. He received a
“Promote” recommendation on his Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) for his
IPZ consideration, and for his first two APZ considerations. He received a
“Definitely Promote” recommendation on his PRF for the P0502B CSB, and was
selected for promotion APZ.
No relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of a
probable error or injustice. The results of the P0599B board were based on
a complete review of his entire selection record, assessing the whole
person factors such as job performance, professional qualities, depth and
breadth of experience, leadership, and education. Although an officer may
be qualified for promotion, he may not be the best qualified of other
eligible officers competing for the limited number of promotion vacancies
in the judgment of a selection board. Furthermore, to grant a direct
promotion would be unfair to all other officers who have extremely
competitive records but did not get promoted. Additionally, both Congress
and DoD have made clear their intent that errors ultimately affecting
promotion should be resolved through the use of SSBs. When many good
officers are competing for a limited number of promotions, it is extremely
competitive. Without access to all the competing records and a review of
their content, they believe sending approved cases to SSBs for remedy is
the fairest and best practice.
Applicant has not provided any documentation showing what action he took to
ensure the AFCM (1OLC) was not missing from his P0500A OSR. To ensure the
contents of the actual OSR were correct, he would have had to request a
copy of his record from Officer Records at HQ AFPC, as directed in the
instructions attached to the Officer Preselection Brief each eligible
officer receives prior to CSBs. Since it is the officer’s responsibility
to ensure the accuracy of his record, they believe that had he checked his
OSR prior to the P0500A Board, he would have noticed the missing citation
and taken corrective action at that time.
Although the AFCM (1OLC) citation was not on file in his OSR when the
P0500A Board convened, the board members knew of its existence as evidenced
by the entry in his Officer Selection Brief, and were therefore aware the
decoration was awarded to the applicant and factored it into the promotion
selection process. As such, they are not convinced the absence of the
citation contributed to his non-selection for promotion. He was considered
and selected for promotion to lieutenant colonel by the P0502B CSB without
the citation in his OSR, as the citation was not filed in his OSR until 13
April 2006.
The AFPC/DPASB evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant responded to the AFPC/DPASB advisory on 9 May 2007. Although he
cannot offer specific evidentiary proof that an error was made, he believes
that since the feedback he was provided cited lack of breadth of
experience, his record was misinterpreted to his detriment, there was a
technical error in the processing of his record, and it is worthy of
reconsideration. He asserts that he achieved and excelled in the whole
person factors such as job performance, professional qualities, depth and
breadth of experience, leadership and education, and that his record
clearly shows extensive depth and breadth of experience as he held every
job in a squadron, served as a primary crew member, instructor, and
evaluator, and served at the Wing level, MAJCOM, IG, and at the USAFA as an
AOC and deputy IG (special duty assignment). He understands he was given
the same opportunity as all others to have his records compared to his
peers, but believes there appears to be an obvious misinterpretation based
on his length of service in an assignment, and this was beyond his control.
He also believes his OPRs from the USAFA were poorly written, and this
could not have helped but hurt his overall perception in the eyes of the
promotion board.
He also feels the lack of the AFCM (1OLC) citation was possibly significant
in the P/DP consideration by the senior rater, as well as giving the board
a chance to review what the decoration was actually awarded for. The
advisory statement that the citation was missing from his OSR for the
P0502B board which subsequently promoted him misses several points. For
that board, he was given a DP and also had received several combat
decorations on top of the missing citation, and asserts the missing
citation that accompanied the award would have made a difference to the
board and that’s the reason they are included in the OSR. He also asserts
he did several reviews prior to the P0500A board, identified the missing
citation, and took appropriate steps to correct his record. He took a copy
of the citation to his servicing MPF, watched as they made copies and typed
the addition to his record, and, having witnessed the action, assumed the
technician had successfully updated his record. He discovered this was not
the case after reviewing his “as met” records.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice to warrant his consideration for
promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by an SSB. After thoroughly
reviewing the complete case file, the Board noted the CY00A (28 November
2000) (P0500A) Lieutenant Colonel CSB considered him for promotion without
his AFCM (1OLC) citation closing 1 June 1999 being included in his OSR.
While the Board cannot determine what impact this citation would have had
on the outcome of the CY00A Lieutenant Colonel CSB, the Board majority is
persuaded he may have been deprived of full and fair consideration. In
view of the above, and in order to keep the record whole, resolve any
injustice, and allow the SSB to perform a complete and accurate assessment,
the Board, by majority vote, voted to recommend that his records be
corrected to the extent indicated below.
4. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of either an error or injustice warranting favorable action on
the applicant’s request for a direct promotion to the grade of lieutenant
colonel, as if selected by the CY99B Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection
Board. In this respect, we note that officers compete for promotion under
the whole person concept whereby a multitude of factors are carefully
assessed by the selection board members prior to scoring the record. In
addition, they may be qualified but – in the judgment of selection board
members vested with discretionary authority to score their records – may
not be the best qualified of those available for the limited number of
promotion vacancies. Consequently, a direct promotion should be granted
only under extraordinary circumstances; i.e., a showing that the officer’s
record cannot be reconstructed in such a manner so as to permit him/her to
compete for promotion on a fair and equitable basis; a showing that the
officer exercised due diligence in pursuing timely and effective relief;
and lastly, that had the original errors not occurred, the probability of
him/her being selected for promotion would have been extremely high. We do
not find these factors in this case. In view of the foregoing, and in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the requested relief.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, to include the AFCM (1OLC) closing 1 June 1999, be considered
for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by a Special Selection
Board for the Calendar Year 2000A (P0500A), Lieutenant Colonel Central
Selection Board and any subsequent boards for which the above award was not
a matter of record.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2007-00627
in Executive Session on 13 June 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Panel Chair
Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member
By majority vote, the Board voted to correct the records as recommended.
Ms. Barbara R. Murray voted to deny the applicant’s request, but does not
wish to submit a minority report. The following documentary evidence was
considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Feb 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit A1. DD Form 149, dated 26 Feb 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPASB, dated 29 Mar 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Apr 07.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 9 May 07.
MICHAEL V. BARBINO
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 2007-00627
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, to include the Air Force Commendation Medal
(First Oak Leaf Cluster), closing 1 June 1999, be considered for promotion
to the grade of lieutenant colonel by a Special Selection Board for the
Calendar Year 2000A Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board and any
subsequent boards for which the above award was not a matter of record.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03316
Operational experience for a support officer is the exception rather than the rule and “counts extra;” therefore, once his DAFSCs are corrected, he should be given SSB consideration for the CY99B LtCol CSB. The applicant has requested SSB consideration based on correcting his DAFSC to reflect his command post duty while he was assigned as Chief Security Police and EAO. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-03362
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03362 INDEX CODE: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: Mr. Barry P. Steinberg XXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Briefs (OSBs) prepared for the Calendar Year 1999B (CY99B) (P0599B), CY00A (P0500A), CY01B (P0501B), and the CY02B (P0502B) Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Central...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-03223
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPO recommends approval of the applicant’s request to reflect his award of the DMSM on his selection briefs for the CY01B and the CY02B LtCol boards. DPPPO recommends denial of the applicant request to show completion of ACSC by correspondence on a date prior to the conduct of the original board that would have first considered him for promotion to LtCol because he did not complete ACSC by...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02498
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was placed at a competitive disadvantage at the calendar year 2000 Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (P0500A), In-the-Promotion Zone (IPZ) for two reasons: (1) A discrepancy in the computerized portion of his OSR, known as the Air Force Officer Selection Brief erroneously indicated to the promotion board that he had been awarded only one MSM when, in fact, he had been awarded two; this...
The applicant contends the citations for the MSM, 1OLC and 2OLC were missing from his OSR. Although the citations were not present in his OSR for the board’s review, the selection board had his entire officer selection record (including the OSB reflecting the MSM, 1OLC and 2OLC) at their disposal during promotion consideration. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02389
His senior rater at the time was responsible for providing promotion recommendations to the selection board. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting correction to the applicant’s Officer Selection Brief (OSB) and Officer Selection Record (OSR) and Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel. It is further recommended that the applicant’s corrected record be considered for...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01461 INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration by the CY99B (30 Nov 99) (P0599B) and CY00A (28 Nov 00) (P0500A) central lieutenant colonel selection boards due to incorrect duty history entries in his record. The DPAO...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02036
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02036 (Case 2) INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS: Direct promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel, with a retroactive date of rank as if selected by the CY00A (28 November 2000) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB), and with a Definitely Promote (DP)...
Service members' entire OSR is evaluated by the central boards. Based on the evidence provided they recommend the applicant's request to be considered for promotion by a special selection board be denied A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR STAFF EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 14 Jun 02, for review and response within 30 days. ...
For his 9 Oct 92 duty entry, "A" is correct and there should be a subsequent entry effective 31 Oct 93 to reflect a change from "A" to "C" (see Exhibit C) AFPC/DPPP recommends denial of the applicant's request. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Duty Air Force Specialty Code, effective 6 October 1992, be changed to...