RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03362
INDEX CODE: 131.00
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: Mr. Barry P. Steinberg
XXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Officer Selection Briefs (OSBs) prepared for the Calendar Year 1999B
(CY99B) (P0599B), CY00A (P0500A), CY01B (P0501B), and the CY02B (P0502B)
Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col) Central Selection Boards (CSBs) be corrected to
reflect completion of Air Command and Staff College (ACSC) prior to
convening of his promotion boards.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Counsel states, in part, that applicant is a class member of a pending
litigation in the United States Court of Federal Claims. As a result of
the settlement, applicant’s record will be considered by a Special
Selection Board on 29 November 2005 for promotion to the grade of Lt Col.
Prior to applicant’s consideration, his records should be corrected to
include his completion of ACSC.
In support of his request, applicant provides his counsel's statement; and
copies of his ACSC completion certificate and a records review RIP. His
complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was considered and not selected for retention in the Air
Force by the FY93 RIF board, which convened on 20 July 1992. Following his
separation from active duty on 31 December 1992, the applicant continued
his career as a Reserve officer. He was appointed a lieutenant colonel
Reserve of the Air Force on 1 October 2005.
Pursuant to the court ordered settlement agreement in the Berkley v. United
States, the Calendar Year 2004 (CY04) Special Board (SB) held on 21
September 2004 overturned this action. The applicant met the CY05 Special
Selection Board (SSB) on 17 May 2005 and was selected for promotion to
major. The applicant will now meet an SSB on 29 November 2005 for
promotion consideration to the grade of Lt Col by the CY99B (P0599B), CY00A
(P0500A), CY01B (P0501B), and the CY02B (P0502B) LtCol CSBs.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPO recommends approval of reflecting completion of ACSC by
correspondence in 2001 on the applicant’s selection briefs meeting the
CY01B and CY02B Lt Col CSBs. However, DPPPO recommends denial of the his
request to reflect completion of ACSC on his selection briefs for the CY99B
and CY00A CSBs because the applicant did not complete ACSC until 11 August
2001, well after the convening dates of the boards (30 November 1999 and
28 November 2000). The DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant’s counsel responded that an error was made in respect to the
involuntary separation of his client. That error has been corrected, but
the consequences of the separation have not been. Denying entry of these
significant achievements denies him an opportunity to complete fairly for
promotion. It is unlikely that any of the benchmark files have unrated
periods of active duty, and certainly not for the extended periods present
in the case of his client. The injustice of these circumstances is
apparent. Removal of that injustice, clearly within the statutory mandate
of the Correction Board, is best achieved by including his military
achievements on the OSB and in the records that will be considered by the
promotion board. Such entry does not assure selection for promotion, but
it is a move in the direction of fundamental fairness and allows the
promotion board to have some information concerning his potential and his
activities during this lengthy and involuntary hiatus. The Counsel’s
rebuttal is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of either an error or an injustice warranting favorable action on
the applicant's request. In this respect, a majority of the Board notes
the applicant was not provided the opportunity to complete AFSC due to his
separation from active duty. He did complete AFSC by correspondence prior
to his consideration for promotion to the Reserve grade of lieutenant
colonel. The Air Force has recommended that ACSC be placed on his OSB for
the CY01B and CY02B Lt Col CSBs; however, they do not recommend that it be
placed on his OSB for the CY99B and CY00A Lt Col CSBs. The Board majority
does not agree. Since the applicant did not have the opportunity to
complete ACSC while on active duty, a majority of the Board believes that
under the circumstances of this case, to offset any possibility of an
injustice to the applicant and in an effort to provide him with proper
relief, his completion of ACSC by correspondence should be reflected in his
OSBs prepared for the SSBs convening on 29 November 2005. Therefore, a
Board majority believes the applicant’s record should be corrected as
indicated below.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to
our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a
hearing is not favorably considered.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that his OSBs prepared for the SSBs
convening by the CY99B, CY00A, CY01B and CY02B Lt Col CSBs be amended to
reflect his completion of ACSC by correspondence in 1999.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 18 November 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Panel Chair
Ms. Sue A. Lumpkins, Member
Mr. Wallace F. Beard Jr., Member
Ms. Graham and Ms. Lumpkins voted to correct the record as recommended.
Mr. Beard voted to correct the records for the CY01A and CY02B Lt Col CSBs
as recommended by the Air Force office of primary responsibility; however,
he voted to deny the applicant request for correcting his OSBs meeting the
CY99B and CY00A Lt Col CSBs. Mr. Beard elected not to submit a minority
report. The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2005-03362 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Oct 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPPPO, dated 7 Nov 05.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Nov 05.
Exhibit D. Counsel’s Rebuttal, dated 11 Nov 05.
KATHLEEN F. GRAHAM
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2005-03362
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that his
Officer Selection Briefs prepared for the Special Selection Boards by the
Calendar Year 1999B (CY99B), CY00A, CY01B and CY02B Lieutenant Colonel
Central Selection Boards be amended to reflect his completion of Air
Command and Staff College by correspondence in 1999.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-03223
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPO recommends approval of the applicant’s request to reflect his award of the DMSM on his selection briefs for the CY01B and the CY02B LtCol boards. DPPPO recommends denial of the applicant request to show completion of ACSC by correspondence on a date prior to the conduct of the original board that would have first considered him for promotion to LtCol because he did not complete ACSC by...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00627
His records be corrected to include the Air Force Commendation Medal, First Oak Leaf Cluster (AFCM)(1OLC) citation in his Officer Selection Record (OSR) for his above-the-promotion-zone (APZ) CY00A (28 November 2000) (P0500A) Lieutenant Colonel CSB, that he was directly promoted to the grade of lieutenant colonel with a DOR commensurate to those selected by the P0500A Lieutenant Colonel CSB, and consideration be given to the overall impact of his situation over his career regarding...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02389
His senior rater at the time was responsible for providing promotion recommendations to the selection board. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting correction to the applicant’s Officer Selection Brief (OSB) and Officer Selection Record (OSR) and Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel. It is further recommended that the applicant’s corrected record be considered for...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01113
The applicant failed to exercise reasonable diligence in maintaining his record prior to the CSBs; therefore, that office recommends denial of the applicant’s request for SSB consideration with the corrected DAFSC. Applicant’s Officer Selection Brief (OSB) and Officer Performance Report (OPR) for the period 22 May 1992 to 10 May 1993, did not reflect his correct Duty Air Force Specialty Code S1555E at the time he was considered for promotion by the CY00A, CY01B, CY02B and the CY03A...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01692
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01692 (Case 2) INDEX CODE: 131.00, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 November 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY02B (12 November 2002) Lieutenant Colonel Central...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-03270
However, DPPPO recommends denial for the applicant’s request to reflect completion of SOS in residence, completion of ACSC in residence, selection for a Regular commission, and an award of an end of tour decoration for his assignment to Korea. All members voted to deny correcting the records to reflect the applicant’s completion of ACSC, a Regular commission, and an end of tour decoration for his assignment to Korea. His Officer Selection Briefs prepared for the Calendar Year 2005 (CY05)...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03316
Operational experience for a support officer is the exception rather than the rule and “counts extra;” therefore, once his DAFSCs are corrected, he should be given SSB consideration for the CY99B LtCol CSB. The applicant has requested SSB consideration based on correcting his DAFSC to reflect his command post duty while he was assigned as Chief Security Police and EAO. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00962
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00962 INDEX CODE: 131.00, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Reports (OPRs), closing 9 January 1999 and 9 January 2000, be replaced with the reaccomplished OPRs he has provided. In view of the foregoing, and in order to offset any possibility of an injustice,...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01022
Additionally, since the citations filed in the Officer Selection Record (OSR) should mirror the decorations displayed on the OSB, the only way to ensure the board members were aware that he received this award would have been to write a letter to the board president for each respective board. The Air Force advisory states the only way the applicant could ensure the board members were aware of his award was to write the board president for each respective board. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01087
Regarding his contention a duty title error which was previously corrected was put back in his record for the 22 Sep 03 SSB, DPPPO states, through the ERAB he requested a correction to his duty title on his 30 Nov 90 OPR. The DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states DPPPO's statement that he was not selected for promotion four times is prejudicial and misleading. During...