RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00294
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED
MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 4 AUGUST 2008
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Block 26, Separation Program Designator (SPD) code, on his DD 214 be
changed from “JHF” (failure to complete a course of instruction) to “LCC”
(reduction in force).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His reason for separation is incorrectly classified. The entry is in error
because of the nature of his discharge. He was removed from flight
training on 10 Mar 05. Following his removal from training he was placed
on “casual status” while waiting to be reclassified and retrained in a new
Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC). His reclassification was recommended by
his group commander. In Jun 05, it became apparent that all the AFSCs in
his branch were fully staffed and the Air Force would not be able to retain
him. He was discharged in Jul 05 under the Force Shaping program due to
the excess of manpower in the Air Force.
The word “failure” is unjust because it applies to the reason he was
removed from training but it was not the reason he was discharged from the
military. His flying deficiencies were identified as “beyond his control”
and do not coincide with the separation code he received.
He was the victim of a reduction in force; therefore, the separation code
“LCC” should apply. His current classification severely tarnishes his
otherwise faultless military service record.
In support of his application, the applicant submits his personal unsigned
statement, a certified copy of his DD 214, a copy of his Record of
Commander’s Review Action, and a copy of an Armed Forces Information
Service News Article.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was a second lieutenant serving as a pilot trainee in the Air
Force Reserves. Information extracted from the Military Personnel Data
System (MilPDS) indicates his Total Active Federal Military Service Date as
5 Jul 04.
On 10 Mar 05, the applicant’s commander recommended he be eliminated from
training due to flying deficiencies that were beyond his control. He
indicated that the applicant was a highly motivated officer with a proven
track record. He further recommended his retraining and retention in the
Air Force.
On 27 Jun 05, the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council directed the
applicant’s discharge under the provisions of AFI 36-3207, paragraph 3.13
(Failure to Complete a Course of Instruction). On 31 Jul 05, the applicant
was honorably discharged with a Separation Designation Code (SPD) of JHF
(failure to complete a course of instruction). He had served 1 year and 26
days of active service.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial.
DPPRS states that since early 2004, the Air Force has aggressively
instituted a variety of force shaping initiatives designed to reduce
personnel levels in order to meet Secretary of Defense-mandated end
strength. DPPPRS attempted to reclassify all training eliminees into Air
Force specialties until accession targets were met. While the decision to
discharge many young officers was a difficult one, the alternative of
reclassifying them into other career fields was neither fiscally prudent
nor acceptable over the long-term.
DPPRS states that based on the documentation on file in the applicant’s
master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural
and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The discharge
was within the discretion of the discharge authority. Additionally, the
applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices
that occurred in the discharge processing, and he provided no facts
warranting change to his SPD code
The complete DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16 Feb
07 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has
received no response.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or an injustice warranting favorable consideration of
the applicant’s request to change his SPD code from “JHF” (failure to
complete a course of instruction) to “LCC” (reduction in force). In that
regard, we agree with and adopt the rationale provided by AFPC/DPPRS on
this issue. Notwithstanding this determination, we note that the
applicant’s failure to complete training was considered beyond his control
and his commander favorably recommended him for retraining and retention in
the Air Force. As such, we agree with the applicant that his current SPD
code and narrative reason for separation may lead to an inaccurate
assessment of the quality of his service. In the interest of avoiding a
possible injustice to the applicant, we recommend his narrative reason for
separation be changed to “Miscellaneous/General Reasons,” with a separation
program designator code of “JND.”
________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 31 July 2005, he was
involuntarily discharged for ‘Miscellaneous/General Reasons” with a
separation program designator (SPD) code of “JND” under the provisions of
10 USC, Section 1552.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application, AFBCMR
Docket Number BC-2007-00294 in Executive Session on 17 April 2007, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Ms. Rita J. Maldonado, Member
Mr. Garry G. Sauner, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2007-00294:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Jan 07, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 9 Feb 07.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Feb 07.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2007-00294
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board of Correction of Military Records and under the authority of
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed
that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 31 July 2005, he was
involuntarily discharged for “Miscellaneous/General Reasons” with a
separation program designator (SPD) code of “JND” under the provisions of
10 USC, Section 1552.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01851
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01851 INDEX CODE: 128.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 DEC 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her debt she incurred as a result of her early separation from active duty be waived. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00676
Air Force Instruction 36-3202, Separation Documents, 20 May 94, states that item 11 of the DD Form 214 will reflect the primary AFSC code (PAFSC) and all additional AFSCs in which the member served for one year or more, during member’s continuous active military service, and for each AFSC, the title with years and months of service. The Separation Program Designation (SPD) code issued in conjunction with his 18 June 2004 release from active duty is correct; however, a majority of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01814
It is his opinion that the Air Force essentially broke their contract by forcing him to cross-train, which ultimately resulted in his separation to meet the Air Force’s force reduction requirements. Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. He was subsequently released from active duty for miscellaneous/general reason after it appears he voluntarily requested separation under the Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02861
The Separation Code he received is, in fact, the code authorized for the type of early separation he requested. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03541
DFAS-POCC/DE states the applicant was discharged with an SPD code of MND. The applicant asserts that he was told by his officers that he would not have to repay his SEB when he voluntarily submitted a request for separation under the LADSC Waiver Program. JAMES W. RUSSELL III Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-03541 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552,...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01317
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 01317 INDEX CODE: 100.06, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 OCTOBER 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from “3A” to “1” to permit reentry into the military without a waiver. On 15 Jan 05, applicant was honorably released from...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02405
The applicant did not submit evidence or identify any errors or injustices and the narrative reason for separation is correct. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 28 November 2006 under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Ms. Cathlynn B. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 25 Aug 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01691
Available documentation in the applicant’s records indicated that on 22 Jul 04, he requested to be separated from active duty on 1 Jan 05 according to AFI 36-3208, Chapter 3, Paragraph 3.14. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPR evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 24 Jun 05 for review and response. As of this...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02495
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02495 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 FEB 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Narrative Reason for Separation be changed from “Miscellaneous/General Reasons” to “Reduction in...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01866
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01866 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 23 DECEMBER 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code of "MND" and narrative reason for separating be changed so he can receive his Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) benefits. The specific authority through which he...