Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03723
Original file (BC-2006-03723.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-03723
            INDEX CODE:      107.00
XXXXXXX     COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  9 JUNE 2008

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to show he was  awarded  the  Air  Force  Longevity
Service Award (AFLSA).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He should be awarded the AFLSA for  his  active  duty  service  and  Reserve
service combined.

In  support  of  his  request,  the  applicant  submits  his  DD  Form  215,
Correction to DD Form 214 Report of Separation from  Active  Duty;  DD  Form
214, Report of  Separation  From  Active  Duty;  DD  Form  256AF,  Discharge
Certificate; an e-mail from the  Military  Personnel  Flight;  and  NA  Form
13059, Transmittal of And/Or Entitlement to Awards.

His complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 20 February 1973.

He was discharged with an honorable discharge on 2 December 1976. He  served
3 years, 10 months and 3 days on active duty.

On 2 October 1980, he enlisted in the Air Force Reserves.   On  11 September
1983 he was honorably discharged from the Air Force Reserves.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial.  DPPPR states the  AFLSA  is  awarded  to  Air
Force members completing an aggregate of four years  of  honorable  service.
DPPPR states there are no  official  documents  in  the  applicant’s  record
verifying he served for four continuous years.   In  addition,  active  duty
and reserve service time can not be combined to meet the criteria for  award
of the AFLSA. therefore DPPPR recommends disapproval of the AFLSA.

The complete AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  22
December 2006 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date,  this
office has received no response (Exhibit D).

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed; however, it is in  the  interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence  and  the  applicant’s  complete  submission,  the  Board  is   not
persuaded that his records should be corrected to show he  was  awarded  the
AFLSA. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging  the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the  opinion  and  recommendation
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and  adopt  its  rationale
as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been  the  victim
of an error or injustice.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board  considered  BC-2005-03723  in  Executive
Session on 31 January 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Michael J. Maglio, Panel Chair
                 Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Member
                 Ms. Sharon B. Seymour, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 26 November 2005, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 13 December 2006.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 December 2006.
   Exhibit E.  Applicant’s Letter, dated 27 December 2006 w/atchs.



            MICHAEL J. MAGLIO
            Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00252

    Original file (BC-2006-00252.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that after a complete review of the applicant’s official military record they have verified the applicant served three tours in the United Kingdom. They indicated that information for applying for the CWC had been sent to the applicant according to past letters in the applicant’s official military record. We took notice of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03718

    Original file (BC-2005-03718.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Standard Form 88, Report of Medical Examination dated 22 May 1973 reflects the applicant received a head injury and laceration in Vietnam due to a bomb explosion in 1972. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or an injustice. Novel, Member The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01242

    Original file (BC-2007-01242.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01242 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 OCT 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he was awarded the Air Force Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR), and the Air Force Longevity Service Award (AFLSA). The AFLSA is awarded to all...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01243

    Original file (BC-2004-01243.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01243 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Award of the Purple Heart (PH) for injuries sustained in January and February 1968. He had completed a total of 20 years, 2 months and 7 days of active duty service for retirement. As of this date, no response has been received by...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03408

    Original file (BC-2005-03408.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The documentation provided by the applicant and the limited military records of the servicemember do not substantiate he had an injury that met the criteria for award of the PH. Nor has the applicant or the servicemember provided any evidence to substantiate the request for award of the PH, such as an eyewitness statement verifying the cause of the crash. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Jan 06.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02156

    Original file (BC-2006-02156.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His complete submission is at Exhibit A. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the applicant’s complete submission, the Board is not persuaded that his records should be corrected to show he was awarded the SAEMR. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02103

    Original file (BC-2006-02103.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02103 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 JANUARY 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded any campaign or service medals for his service during Operation Desert Storm. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00245

    Original file (BC-2006-00245.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00245 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 July 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his promotion to the grade of staff sergeant (SSgt)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01259

    Original file (BC-2006-01259.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01259 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: Department of Veterans Services HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 27 OCTOBER 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM), Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR) and any other awards he may be entitled to for his four...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02775

    Original file (BC-2006-02775.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    To be awarded the PH, a member must provide documentation to support he was wounded as a direct result of enemy action and must have received medical treatment by medical personnel. Each request is considered on the policies and criteria in use at the time the veteran was injured, and the determination is dependent on the documentary evidence presented. Neither evidence provided by the applicant nor the service-member’s records substantiate he was injured as a direct result of enemy action...