Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02775
Original file (BC-2006-02775.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-02775
            INDEX CODE:  107.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  17 MARCH 08

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her deceased spouse be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her husband was held as a Prisoner of War  (POW)  by  the  Japanese  from  8
April 1942 to 17 August 1945.  She indicates there was  a  law  passed  that
stated all POWs would be awarded the PH as a result of  being  held  captive
during World War II.

In support of her request, the  applicant  provided  a  statement  from  the
service-member and a certificate of death.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The service-members's military personnel records were destroyed by  fire  in
1973 at the National Personnel Record Center (NPRC) in St. Louis,  Missouri;
based on the available documentation the following facts are provided.

The service-member with prior service entered  active  duty  on  15 December
1945 and on 14 December 1948 was honorably released from active duty.

He was a POW from 7 May 1942 to 2 September 1945.

To be awarded the PH, a member must provide documentation to support he  was
wounded as a direct result of enemy action and must  have  received  medical
treatment by medical personnel.   Indirect  injuries  include  but  are  not
limited to, diseases, exposure,  injuries  received  while  seeking  shelter
from mortar or rocket attacks, aircraft  bombings,  grenades,  and  injuries
incurred while serving as an aircraft member or in a passenger status  as  a
result of the aircraft’s evasive measures against hostile fire.  Public  Law
104-106,  February  10,  1996,  amended  PH  eligibility  criteria   stating
Secretaries shall treat a former POW who was wounded before April 25,  1962,
while held prisoner in the same manner as a former POW wounded on  or  after
that date while held a POW.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial.  DPPPR states the applicant  did  not  provide
documentation to  substantiate  her  claim.   The  applicant’s  request  was
forwarded to the Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB) on 8 November  2006.   The
PHRB determined the applicant did not have sufficient medical  documentation
evidence to approve the PH.  The PHRB has the authority, on  behalf  of  the
Secretary of the Air Force, to determine a veteran’s entitlement to the  PH.
 Each request is considered on the policies and criteria in use at the  time
the  veteran  was  injured,  and  the  determination  is  dependent  on  the
documentary evidence presented.

AFPC/DPPPR verified the  service-member’s  entitlement  to  the  POW  Medal,
American Campaign Medal, and the World War II Victory Medal.   These  awards
will be added to his WD  AGO  Form  53  –  Enlisted  Record  and  Report  of
Separation.

The DPPPR complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 15 December 2006, the evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the  applicant  for
review and comment within 30 days  (Exhibit  D).   As  of  this  date,  this
office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed; however, it is in  the  interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or injustice.  The applicant’s  contentions  are  duly
noted; however, after thoroughly reviewing the  applicant’s  submission,  we
are not persuaded  the  service-member  should  be  awarded  the  PH  Medal.
Neither evidence provided by the applicant nor the service-member’s  records
substantiate he was injured as a direct result of enemy action  as  required
for award of the PH.  The personal sacrifice the former member  endured  for
his country is noted and our decision in no way diminishes the  high  regard
we have for his service;  however,  insufficient  documentary  evidence  has
been presented to  warrant  awarding  him  the  PH.   Should  the  applicant
provide documentation, i.e., medical reports  or  letters  of  support  from
eyewitnesses, which would show the service-member was injured  as  a  direct
result of enemy action, we  would  be  willing  to  review  his  appeal  for
reconsideration.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary,  we
find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or injustice; the application  was  denied  without  a
personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon  the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not  considered  with  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2006-
02775 in Executive Session on 31 January 2007, under the provisions  of  AFI
36-2603:

                 Mr. Michael J. Maglio, Panel Chair
                 Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Member
                 Ms. Sharon B. Seymour, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 20 Sep 06, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 15 Nov 06, w/atchs.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Dec 06.





                       MICHAEL J. MAGLIO
                       Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03408

    Original file (BC-2005-03408.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The documentation provided by the applicant and the limited military records of the servicemember do not substantiate he had an injury that met the criteria for award of the PH. Nor has the applicant or the servicemember provided any evidence to substantiate the request for award of the PH, such as an eyewitness statement verifying the cause of the crash. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Jan 06.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02262

    Original file (BC-2006-02262.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 600-45, dated 22 September 1943, during the period in question, the PH was awarded for wounds received in action against the enemy or as a direct result of an act of such enemy, provided the wound necessitated treatment by medical personnel. The Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB), on behalf of the Secretary of the Air Force, has the authority to determine a veteran’s entitlement to the PH. The PH is awarded for injuries received as a direct result of enemy action.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02966

    Original file (BC-2005-02966.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02966 INDEX CODE: 100.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 MARCH 2007 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH), the Prisoner-of-War Medal (POW), and an oak leaf cluster to the Air Medal (AM, 1 OLC). Further, he is entitled to the POW because he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02265

    Original file (BC-2006-02265.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in his reconstructed limited military records to support he was injured as a direct result of enemy action. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Should he respond with evidence of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00533

    Original file (BC-2003-00533.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He did suffer the atrocity of beatings to his lower back while a POW at Stalag Luft IV and the DVA has determined his lower back condition is service-connected for the injury received while a POW. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the Board finds...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00899

    Original file (BC-2003-00899.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no indication of an aircraft accident and his being held prisoner of war (POW). The evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 8 August 2003, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. The applicant claims that his records are incomplete because they do not reflect an aircraft accident or that he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03304

    Original file (BC-2003-03304.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that applicant has provided no medical evidence showing that he was injured while a POW, and there is no evidence in his military medical records to indicate he was injured while a POW. Additionally, in 1988, the Veterans Administration determined the evidence of record did not show right ankle or right knee injuries. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03192

    Original file (BC-2003-03192.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was awarded the Purple Heart (PH) on 8 April 1945, for wounds received in the ETO on 24 March 1945. The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19 March 2004 for review and response. The applicant was awarded the PH on 8 April 1945, for wounds he received during a forced aircraft bail out on 24 March 1945.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00216

    Original file (BC-2006-00216.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 23 February 2006, the Purple Heart Review Board (PHRB) reviewed and denied the applicant’s request for award of the PH. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart Medal for injuries sustained as a direct result of enemy action during an aerial combat mission over Weimar, Germany on 24 August...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01120

    Original file (BC-2004-01120.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the PH medal. There is no evidence in the applicant’s records that he sustained injuries or beatings. After a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the available evidence of record, the board was not persuaded that he should be awarded the Purple Heart Medal.