Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03299
Original file (BC-2006-03299.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03299
            INDEX CODE:  128.00
            COUNSEL:  None
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Apr 29, 2008

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

She be paid separation pay as promised.
_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She was promised $22,347 minus taxes as separation pay  and  her  separation
orders authorized the pay.

She was counseled on  the  amount  of  separation  pay  prior  to  going  on
terminal leave and the separation pay amount  was  placed  on  her  DD  214,
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.

On 6 Oct 06, an employee at Nellis AFB finance department told her a  waiver
was forthcoming in order to pay the separation pay.

After numerous calls checking on the status of the waiver and  payment,  she
has not received the separation pay as promised to date.

In support of her request, the applicant provided a copy of  her  separation
orders, a financial worksheet, and a copy of her DD Form 214.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant entered active duty Air Force on 11 May 02 upon acceptance  of
her commission as a second lieutenant.

She was notified on 10 May 06 of her  non-selection  for  retention  by  the
Force Shaping Board and informed she would be involuntarily released 29  Sep
06.  The applicant acknowledged
receipt of the pending discharge on 11  May  06.   She  served  4  years,  3
months, and 21 days and  was  honorably discharged on 29 Sep 06.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRF recommends denial.  The applicant served  4  years  total  active
duty, with service component reserve, when she  was  involuntarily  released
from the Air Force by the FY06 Force Shaping Board, and had not  served  the
6 years required by law for separation pay.  U.S. Code,  Title  10,  Section
1174, Separation pay upon  involuntary  discharge  or  release  from  active
duty, (c)(1)(a), states members must have  completed  6  or  more  years  of
active service immediately before release to be entitled to separation  pay.


The  applicant’s  DD  214,  Item  18  Remarks  “Separation  Pay   authorized
$22,347.00” is incorrect and not authorized in accordance with AFI  36-3202,
Table 4.

The applicant’s AF  Form  100,  Request  and  Authorization  for  Separation
Orders, is in error in accordance with  AFI  36-2102,  Attachment  11,  Item
21C.

AFPC/DPPRF is recommending the applicant’s DD 214 be corrected  and  amended
to  reflect  the  member’s  true  entitlement  and  to  remove  the  remarks
pertaining to authorized separation pay.

The complete AFPC/DPPRF evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:


A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 22  Dec
06 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this office  has
not received a response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the  case;  however,  we  agree
with the opinion and recommendation of  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary
responsibility in regards to the applicant’s request for separation pay  and
adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the  applicant  has
not been the victim of an  error  or  injustice.   Additionally,  the  Board
defers  to  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary  responsibility   for   the
administrative correction of the applicant’s DD Form 214  and  AF  IMT  Form
100.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2006-03299
in Executive Session on 31 January 2007, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Michael J. Maglio, Panel Chair
      Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Member
      Ms. Sharon B. Seymour, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 20 Oct 06.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRF, dated 11 Dec 06.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Dec 06.




                                   MICHAEL J. MAGLIO
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00780

    Original file (BC-2006-00780.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    She did not receive any notice of the debt during the eight months after her separation from the Air Force. JA states the Air Force Shaping Program provided certain individuals with an opportunity to voluntarily opt out of their enlistments on the condition that they repay any bonuses received. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that the applicant should be given the relief requested.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01579

    Original file (BC-2006-01579.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01579 INDEX CODE: 131.01 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 27 NOVEMBER 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Officer Selection Record (OSR) be corrected to reflect her Acquisition Professional Development Program (APDP) Level I Certification (10 December 2003), and ADPD Level II...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01656

    Original file (BC-2007-01656.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRF recommends denial. The complete DPPRF evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | Bc-2006-01578

    Original file (Bc-2006-01578.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01578 INDEX NUMBER: 136.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 Nov 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The results of the CY06 Line of the Air Force Force Shaping Board results be corrected to show that he was selected for retention. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2006-01578

    Original file (BC-2006-01578.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01578 INDEX NUMBER: 136.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 Nov 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The results of the CY06 Line of the Air Force Force Shaping Board results be corrected to show that he was selected for retention. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01772

    Original file (BC-2006-01772.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support, the applicant provides a reaccomplished RRF and a statement from her senior rater, the Assistant Vice Chief of Staff (HQ USAF/CVA), who requests the contested RRF be replaced with the reaccomplished form including the WHSA duty information. The AF/CVA Protocol Office indicated the applicant “no longer worked there,” was on terminal leave, and had been selected for the WHSA position after the CY06A FSB convened. HQ AFPC/DPPRF noted the applicant’s submission did not indicate...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00246

    Original file (BC-2007-00246.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Deputy Chief of Staff, Manpower and Personnel, released an FY07 Force Shaping message outlining the voluntary separation pay (VSP) incentives which pays a lump sum payment to officers who voluntarily separate from active duty. The opportunity to participate or reverse a previous declination to participate in MGIB, if previously considered ineligible, is not authorized by the SecAF for those individuals who elect to separate voluntarily. We took notice of the applicant's complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01851

    Original file (BC-2007-01851.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01851 INDEX CODE: 128.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 DEC 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her debt she incurred as a result of her early separation from active duty be waived. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04532

    Original file (BC 2013 04532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She was informed by the Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) Education Office that her separation code needs to be changed to reflect “COG” so the DVA can consider her eligibility for the MGIB. She was advised that the DVA will only consider her application if her separation code is changed to “COG.” She voluntarily separated under the FY04 Force Shaping Program; was offered the MGIB prior to separating and wants to use the benefit she paid into. However, according to the DVA letter dated...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00257

    Original file (BC-2005-00257.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was told by her recruiter that she would be able to participate in the CLRP program and further told that once she provided a promissory letter the Air Force would automatically pay for her loan. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant entered the delayed enlistment program on 18 Sep 02 and enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 13 May 03. ...