Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03123
Original file (BC-2006-03123.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-03123
            INDEX CODE:  137.04

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: YES

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His record be changed to show he made no  Reserve  Component  Survivor
Benefit Plan (RCSBP) election of any type.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He did not make an RCSBP election in 1994, he was not married  at  the
time and his children were aged 25, 22, and 17, and  when  he  applied
for retired pay in 2006, he elected no RCSBP benefits.

In support of his appeal, the applicant has  provided  copies  of  his
Retiree Account Statement (RAS), his DD Form 2656, Data for Payment of
Retired Personnel, and a copy of a letter from the SBP clerk he  dealt
with.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The  applicant  received  his  official  Letter  of  Notification   of
Eligibility for Retired pay  at  Age  60  (20-year  letter)  in  1994.
Concurrent to receipt of the letter, members are also notified of  the
opportunity to enroll in the  RCSBP.   On  an  Air  Reserve  Personnel
Center (ARPC) Form 123, RCSBP Election Certificate,  he  elected  full
immediate coverage for his children.  He signed the form on 14  August
2004.  While there is no payment for RCSBP premiums until he begins to
draw retired pay, the law stated he couldn’t revoke coverage at age 60
when the premiums became due.

When he  applied  for  retired  pay  in  2006,  he  marked  the  block
indicating he wished not to participate.  Since he already had a valid
election in place (1994) he could not make an election at  age  60  to
decline the RCSBP coverage.  However, each participant of the  SBP  is
entitled to a disenrollment period which begins after two  full  years
of being entitled to receive retired pay (between  ages  62  and  63).
Applicants must apply for this feature through the Defense Finance and
Accounting Service (DFAS) in order to opt out during the year they are
allowed to do so.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPP recommends denial.  DPP states the member made a valid  RCSBP
election for children only in 1994.  This  election  was  still  valid
when he applied for retired pay at age 60; therefore he cannot decline
RCSBP coverage at age 60.

DPP’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 3
November 2006 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date,
this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the  basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  However, since each participant  of  the  SBP  is
entitled to a disenrollment period that begins after two full years of
being entitled to receive retired pay (between the ages of 62 and  63)
he will have the opportunity to opt out of the program at that  point.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling basis to recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this
application.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not  been
shown  that  a  personal  appearance  with  or  without  counsel  will
materially  add  to  our  understanding  of  the  issue(s)   involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-03123  in  Executive  Session  on  30  January  2007,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Panel Chair
      Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
      Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 4 Oct 06, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, ARPC/DPP, dated 1 Nov 06, w/atchs.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Nov 06.




                                   KATHLEEN F. GRAHAM
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02431

    Original file (BC-2006-02431.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was properly advised of his options and the requirements of the law and elected not to respond; therefore, the automatic election of immediate coverage for spouse was given as required by law. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02627

    Original file (BC-2006-02627.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ), Section 1448a, “A participant in the Plan may, subject to the provisions of this section, elect to discontinue participation in the Plan at any time during the one-year period beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which payment of retired pay commences.” DPP’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02790

    Original file (BC-2006-02790.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since this RCSBP election was still valid the applicant could not make an election on his DD Form 2656 when he applied for retired pay. By law a member may discontinue participation in RCSBP at any time during the one-year period beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which payment of retired pay commences. Since his RCSBP election was still valid when he applied for retired pay, he could not make a SBP election on his DD Form 2656.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03468

    Original file (BC-2006-03468.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/DPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request. He made no election during that time and was automatically enrolled in Option A, “Deferred election until age 60.” During the RCSBP Open Season...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02692

    Original file (BC-2006-02692.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    While the former spouse did provide a copy of the divorce decree to DFAS, the paperwork that was filed by the former spouse was for former spouse benefits through the member’s Federal civilian retirement plan and not his military retirement. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 22 April 1997, he elected full and immediate...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01228

    Original file (BC-2007-01228.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPP records show that the family members are updated in their system. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. It appears the applicant was notified on several occasions of her eligibility to participate in RCSBP and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02034

    Original file (BC-2006-02034.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    When a member makes an election to participate in the RCSBP, the election is irrevocable. ARPC/DPP complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force advisory and states he never received notice or information about withdrawing from RCSBP. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-03855

    Original file (BC-2005-03855.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 October 2006, the applicant provided additional documentation in support of his request to terminate his participation in the RCSBP (Exhibit I). We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or an injustice. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04003

    Original file (BC-2007-04003.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 2656 instructions do state that if a member elected Immediate RCSBP coverage, (Option C), and the selected beneficiary is no longer eligible, they need to annotate the remarks section and send supporting documentation. In the case of children only coverage, there would be no SBP cost associated with the election if the children had aged-out, but at age 60 the member's monthly retired pay is reduced to account for the RCSBP coverage from the date of election since no premiums are...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01011

    Original file (BC-2002-01011.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He retired effective 1 February 2002 and is currently receiving retired pay. By law, once a member completes 20 years of TAFMS and applies for retired pay, the RCSBP election is no longer valid and the member must make an SBP election. However, he did receive SBP cost information when he elected RCSBP coverage in 1986.