Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02627
Original file (BC-2006-02627.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-02627
            INDEX CODE:

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO



_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His record be changed to allow him to withdraw  his  participation  in
the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His wife and he do not want RCSBP  and  he  has  filed  the  paperwork
necessary to discontinue his participation.  He  was  not  made  aware
that a selection for RCSBP had to be made  within  90  days  after  he
retired in December 2004.  In fact, he  was  not  made  aware  of  his
current situation until 23 August 2006.  He originally had  elected  a
reduced RCSBP when he received his  first  packet  on  3  April  2006.
After  discussing  his  decision  with  his  spouse  and  taking  into
consideration he has  an  SBP  election  in  force  from  his  federal
position and his wife’s social security  and  State  retirement,  they
both felt she did not need another annuity.   He  recently  called  to
check on the status of his request and found out  that  since  he  was
married and had  not  made  an  election  within  90  days  after  his
retirement that the  election  of  Option  C,  Immediate  Annuity  for
Spouse, was made for him.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

He was notified of his eligibility to  participate  in  the  RCSBP  by
letter dated 6 June 2005.   The  election  package  was  sent  to  his
current address on file and he made no election during that time.   He
was therefore automatically enrolled in Option  C,  Immediate  Annuity
for Spouse.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ  ARPC/DPP  recommends  denial.   DPP  states  the   applicant   may
discontinue the program on the second anniversary of receiving retired
pay, as required by Title 10.  Under  Title  10,  United  States  Code
(U.S.C.), Section 1448a, “A participant in the Plan  may,  subject  to
the provisions of this section, elect to discontinue participation  in
the Plan at any time during  the  one-year  period  beginning  on  the
second anniversary of  the  date  on  which  payment  of  retired  pay
commences.”

DPP’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
22 September 2006 for review and comment within 30 days.  As  of  this
date, this office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the  basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  However, since each participant  of  the  SBP  is
entitled to a disenrollment period that begins after two full years of
being entitled to receive retired pay (between the ages of 62 and  63)
he will have the opportunity to opt out of the program at that  point.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling basis to recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-02627  in  Executive  Session  on  30  January  2007,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:


      Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Panel Chair
      Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
      Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 23 Aug 06.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, ARPC/DPP, dated, 15 Sep 06, w/atchs.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Sep 06.




                                   KATHLEEN F. GRAHAM
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02790

    Original file (BC-2006-02790.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since this RCSBP election was still valid the applicant could not make an election on his DD Form 2656 when he applied for retired pay. By law a member may discontinue participation in RCSBP at any time during the one-year period beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which payment of retired pay commences. Since his RCSBP election was still valid when he applied for retired pay, he could not make a SBP election on his DD Form 2656.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02431

    Original file (BC-2006-02431.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was properly advised of his options and the requirements of the law and elected not to respond; therefore, the automatic election of immediate coverage for spouse was given as required by law. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-03855

    Original file (BC-2005-03855.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 October 2006, the applicant provided additional documentation in support of his request to terminate his participation in the RCSBP (Exhibit I). We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or an injustice. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02692

    Original file (BC-2006-02692.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    While the former spouse did provide a copy of the divorce decree to DFAS, the paperwork that was filed by the former spouse was for former spouse benefits through the member’s Federal civilian retirement plan and not his military retirement. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 22 April 1997, he elected full and immediate...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03468

    Original file (BC-2006-03468.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/DPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request. He made no election during that time and was automatically enrolled in Option A, “Deferred election until age 60.” During the RCSBP Open Season...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02247

    Original file (BC-2006-02247.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his selection for the benefit in 1996, there was very little information provided to a reserve member on the cost of RCSBP. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPP recommends denial indicating that the RCSBP package that was sent to the applicant clearly explained each option of the RCSBP and the cost of associated benefits. We...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03489

    Original file (BC-2005-03489.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Applicant states that her DFAS-CL 7220/48, Retiree Account Statement, shows an error for the RCSBP cost of $29.66 and request this error be corrected. She chose option C because their were no mention of RCSBP cost in Section VI, and the base personnel office did not make her aware of the cost associated with electing Option C. She never expected to pay for anything except for one payment for spouse...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02034

    Original file (BC-2006-02034.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    When a member makes an election to participate in the RCSBP, the election is irrevocable. ARPC/DPP complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force advisory and states he never received notice or information about withdrawing from RCSBP. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01228

    Original file (BC-2007-01228.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPP records show that the family members are updated in their system. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. It appears the applicant was notified on several occasions of her eligibility to participate in RCSBP and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03123

    Original file (BC-2006-03123.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He did not make an RCSBP election in 1994, he was not married at the time and his children were aged 25, 22, and 17, and when he applied for retired pay in 2006, he elected no RCSBP benefits. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...