Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04003
Original file (BC-2007-04003.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2007-04003
            INDEX CODE:  137.00
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be allowed  to  terminate  his  child-only  coverage  under  the  Reserve
Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His children are no longer eligible by age to receive benefits in the  event
of his death.

In support of his request, the applicant provided a  personal  statement,  a
copy of his DD Form 2656, Data for  Payment  of  Retired  Personnel,  and  a
Retiree Account Statement.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant elected RCSBP -  Option  C,  Immediate  Annuity  for  children
coverage based on full-retired pay on 15 December 1994.

He remarried in 2001, and did not request his spouse be added to  his  RCSBP
election.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPP recommends denial.  DPP states when the applicant completed the  DD
Form 2656 to apply for his retired pay on 5 May 2007, he  marked  the  block
in Section IX indicating that he wished not to participate  in  SBP.   Since
he already had a valid RCSBP election in place (15 December 1994), he  could
not make an election at age 60 to  decline  the  coverage.   The  additional
instructions for the DD  Form  2656,  cited  by  applicant,  are  under  the
heading "Reserve and Air National Guard Members Retiring with  20  Years  of
Active Duty Service."  The applicant did not have 20 years  of  active  duty
service under the provision of Title 10, U.S.C.,  Section  8914;  therefore,
these instructions do not apply to him.

The DD Form 2656 instructions do state that if a  member  elected  Immediate
RCSBP coverage, (Option C),  and  the  selected  beneficiary  is  no  longer
eligible, they need to annotate the  remarks  section  and  send  supporting
documentation.  In the case of children only coverage,  there  would  be  no
SBP cost associated with the election if the children had aged-out,  but  at
age 60 the member's monthly retired pay is reduced to account for the  RCSBP
coverage from the date of election since no  premiums  are  paid  until  the
member begins drawing retired pay.   The  applicant  began  drawing  Reserve
retired pay on 12 July 2007, his 60th birthday.  The applicant is  currently
paying $11.25 per month to cover the RCSBP cost.

The applicant was provided information regarding  the  RCSBP  prior  to  his
election.  Members who elect RCSBP coverage receive  annuity  protection  as
soon as they elect such coverage.  During the period of RCSBP coverage,  the
member paid no premiums.  If the applicant  had  died  before  his  children
aged out, they would have collected an annuity.  The reduction for  children
only coverage in retired pay is calculated so  that  the  premiums  for  the
RCSBP coverage are  paid  over  the  course  of  the  member's  lifetime  as
actuarially determined under the authority  of  Title  10,  U.S.C.,  Section
1452(b)(3).  The premiums will continue until the applicant has paid  for  a
total of 360 months.

The complete DPP evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 25 January 2008, the  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the  applicant  for
review and comment within 30 days  (Exhibit  C).   As  of  this  date,  this
office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or injustice.  The applicant’s  contentions  are  duly
noted; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of  the  office
of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale  as  the  basis  for  our
conclusion that the applicant has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or
injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary,  we  find
no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or injustice; the application  was  denied  without  a
personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon  the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not  considered  with  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2007-
04003 in Executive Session on 24 July 2008, under the provisions of AFI  36-
2603:

                 Ms. B J White-Olson, Panel Chair
                 Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
                 Mr. Garry G. Sauner, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 24 November 2007, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, ARPC/DPP, dated 17 January 2008, w/atchs.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 January 2008.




                 B J WHITE-OLSON
                 Panel Chair



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03123

    Original file (BC-2006-03123.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He did not make an RCSBP election in 1994, he was not married at the time and his children were aged 25, 22, and 17, and when he applied for retired pay in 2006, he elected no RCSBP benefits. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00269

    Original file (BC-2008-00269.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPP recommends the requested relief be denied. ARPC/DPP states the applicant is ineligible to make an election for spouse coverage under the SBP because his request was received after the one year time requirement. ARPC/DPP's complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00775

    Original file (BC-2008-00775.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant did not include his child in his initial election on 21 February 1989 nor did he notify this office when he acquired this child within a year as required by law. In 2003, ARPC sent a letter to the applicant stating it was time to apply for his Reserve retired pay to be effective on 7 August 2003, his 60th birthday. When the applicant completed his application for retired pay - he changed his election from spouse only to spouse and child declaring his disabled child.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00113

    Original file (BC-2012-00113.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00113 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) premiums be stopped. However, if the decision is to grant the re1ief sought, the member's DFAS pay record should be corrected to show that he elected to not participate in the SBP effective 22...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00697

    Original file (BC-2011-00697.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The notification included information regarding his RCSBP election of Option C. The applicant completed his retired pay application, verified his election, and elected not to participate in the RCSBP. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008928

    Original file (20070008928.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 16 October 2007, DFAS informed this agency by email that the applicant used the wrong DD Form 2656 and signed it on 15 April 2007 after having been placed on the TDRL. The applicant alleges that she does not remember electing SBP; however, the evidence shows that she completed an SBP Election Certificate, DD Form 2656-5 (the incorrect form for a member being medically retired), on 15 April 2005, after placement on the TDRL. The applicant reviewed her Retiree Account Statement (SBP/RSFPP...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00552

    Original file (BC-2010-00552.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DPP complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03865

    Original file (BC 2014 03865.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was not aware the ARPC Form 123, Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate, he signed on 14 Sep 94 requesting RCSBP spouse coverage would be used for retirement since he was not yet retired. We note the applicant did not request his RCSBP election for spouse coverage be terminated within 90 days of notification of eligibility for Reserve component retired pay IAW 10 U.S.C. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03468

    Original file (BC-2006-03468.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/DPP recommends denial of the applicant’s request. He made no election during that time and was automatically enrolled in Option A, “Deferred election until age 60.” During the RCSBP Open Season...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009927

    Original file (20080009927.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DD Form 2656-5 dated 25 August 2005 shows that the applicant selected Option C (Immediate Annuity) to provide an immediate annuity to his spouse and dependent children based on his full retirement pay beginning on the day after the date of his death, whether before or after age 60. Based on the foregoing evidence, it is now appropriate to correct the applicant's records to show that he changed his SBP election to immediate annuity coverage for spouse only based on full gross pay without...