RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01998
INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 9 JANUARY 2008
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed so he may reenter
military service.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He wanted to stay in the Air Force at the time of his enlistment. He was
told by the recruiter not to mention his back problem. He has since
completed the police academy.
In support of his request, applicant provided a copy of DD Form 214,
Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 24 November 1998 for a
period of four years.
On 17 December 1998, he was notified by his commander he was recommending
he be separated from the Air Force for fraudulent entry. The basis for the
commander's recommendation was applicant intentionally concealed a prior
service medical condition, which if revealed, could have resulted in
rejection of his enlistment. Specifically, when the applicant completed the
Standard Form 93, Report of Medical History, he answered, "no" to the
question "have you ever had or have you recurrent back pain?" He also
checked "no" to the question have you consulted or been treated by clinics,
physicians, healers, or other practitioners within the past five years. On
2 December 1998, applicant was seen in the Orthopedic Clinic and he
reported he had thoracic to lumbar pain for the past two years.
He acknowledged receipt of the notification of discharge and waived his
right to consult with legal counsel and submit statements in his own
behalf. The discharge authority approved the separation and directed the
applicant be separated with an uncharacterized entry-level separation.
On 23 December 1998, the applicant was separated from the Air Force under
the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen
(fraudulent entry into military service), with an uncharacterized entry-
level separation. Since his enlistment was considered fraudulent, his total
active service was non-creditable.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPRS recommends denial and states the discharge was consistent with
the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and
was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant did
not submit any evidence or identify any errors in his discharge processing.
He provided no facts warranting a change to his RE code.
AFPC/DPPRS's complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and stated that after leaving
the military, he has worked in law enforcement at the Greenville Police
Department, attended a rigorous eight-week police academy, and is currently
employed at the Morristown Police Department. He has attached copies of
his physical exam he had performed prior to being hired at the Morristown
Police Department which was required to become employed as an officer. He
has also included post service letters.
Applicant's complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of injustice. After a thorough review of the evidence of record
and the applicant’s complete submission, the Board is of the opinion there
was no deliberate deception on the part of the applicant upon his entry
into the Air Force. While the RE code assigned to the applicant, at the
time was technically correct and in accordance with the applicable
instructions, we believe it would be an injustice for him to continue to
suffer its effects in the way of enlistment opportunities in the armed
forces. Furthermore, we find it appropriate that he be afforded the
opportunity to apply for a waiver to enlist in the armed services and allow
him the opportunity to further serve his country. Whether or not he is
successful will depend on the needs of the services and our recommendation
in no way guarantees that he will be allowed to return to any branch of
service. Accordingly, we recommend that the applicant’s records be
corrected as indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 23 December 1998, he was
separated under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 1.2 (Secretarial
Authority) with a separation code of JFF and a reenlistment eligibility
(RE) code of 3K.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2006-01998
in Executive Session on 21 September 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Michael Gallogly, Panel Chair
Mr. Dean Yount, Member
Mr. Gregory Parker, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Jun 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 17 Jul 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Jul 06.
Exhibit E. Applicant's response, dated 11 Aug 06.
MICHAEL GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2006-01998
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that on 23 December
1998, he was separated under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 1.2
(Secretarial Authority) with a separation code of JFF and a reenlistment
eligibility (RE) code of 3K.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00468
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. However, after reviewing the evidence of record and the Air Force assessment of this case, it is our opinion that the narrative reason and RE code improperly label the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00406
Based on documentation in the file, they found the discharge consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states she knows there was no error or nothing in the form of an injustice, but still requests her records be corrected (Exhibit E). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00437
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00437 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2C” be changed to allow his enlistment into either the Army or Air Force. On 19 June 1998, he received an uncharacterized entry-level separation under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Fraudulent Entry into...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01689
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01689 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her to join the Armed Forces. In support of her request, the applicant submitted a personal statement, and a letter of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01445
On 4 November 2004, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgraded the applicant’s discharge from general (under honorable conditions) to honorable; however, the AFDRB did not change the narrative reason nor the RE code. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommended denial and, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, concludes the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00417
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00417 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 AUGUST 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation program designator (SPD) and reenlistment eligibility (RE) codes be changed to permit re-entry into the military (Army). Examiner’s Note: On 16 May 06, AFPC/DPPRSP...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00599
The discharge authority approved the separation and directed the applicant be discharged with an honorable discharge without probation and rehabilitation. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. He provided...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01106
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied, and states, in part, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, the Board is of the opinion there was no deliberate deception on the...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02476
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02476 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: American Legion HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to delete Disability, Existed Prior to Service (EPTS). DPPD’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-00242 INDEX NUMBER: 110.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 2C be changed to an eligible code so that he can reenlist and continue in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...