RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01689
INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility
(RE) code be changed to allow her to join the Armed Forces.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She successfully completed basic military training but experienced
problems in security forces technical training school when she
could not qualify in weapons training. She spent many hours in
remedial weapons training, but was unable to qualify and was
subsequently discharged. She has spoken with an Army recruiter and
would like to enlist if her RE code could be changed.
In support of her request, the applicant submitted a personal
statement, and a letter of recommendation.
Her complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
___________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 8 May 2002 in
the grade of airman basic. On 6 August 2002, her commander
notified the applicant that he was recommending that she be
discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFI 36-3208,
Administrative Separation of Airmen (entry-level performance and
conduct). The specific reasons for his action were her failure to
make satisfactory progress in a required training program. The
applicant failed her written test 1 version A on 16 July 2002,
scoring a 66; passing score is 70. On 18 July 2002, she failed to
meet minimum qualifying standards on the M9 weapon, twice scoring
16 and 24; the minimum passing score is 28. On 18,19, and 22 July
2002, she failed to qualify on the M16A2 weapon, scoring 8, 10, 17
and 24; the minimum passing score is 25. Prior to
disqualification, she was counseled and received individual
assistance with negative results. The applicant was advised of her
rights in the matter. On 6 August 2002, she acknowledged receipt
of the notification, and waived her right to consult counsel, and
elected not to submit statements on her own behalf. The case was
reviewed on 7 August 2002 and found to be legally sufficient to
support discharge. She was separated from the Air Force on
15 August 2002, with an uncharacterized entry-level separation,
received a RE code of 2C”Involuntarily separated with an honorable
discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of
service.” She served three (3) months and eight (8) days on active
duty.
___________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. Airmen are given entry-level
separation/uncharacterized service characterization when separation
is initiated in the first 180 days of continuous active service.
The Department of Defense (DoD) determined if a member served less
than 180 days of continuous active service, it would be unfair to
the member and the service to characterize their limited service.
Therefore, her uncharacterized character of service is correct and
in accordance with DoD and Air Force instructions. A complete copy
of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial. The Reenlistment Eligibility (RE)
code of 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge;
or entry-level separation without characterization of service” is
correct. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D.
___________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant
on 18 July 2003 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
___________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or injustice. We took note that the
applicant while in the Air Force, failed to meet the M-16
qualification score for continuance in the Security Police career
field and was discharged with an uncharacterized entry-level
separation. However, the Army recruiters are of the opinion she
would be suited for other positions. The applicant has expressed a
desire to enlist into the Army and we believe she should be given
the opportunity to apply for enlistment. Whether or not she is
successful will depend on the needs of the service and our
recommendation in no way guarantees that she will be allowed to
return to any branch of service. Therefore, we recommend the
applicant's records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that at the time of her
discharge on 15 August 2002, she was separated under the provisions
of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 1.2 (Secretarial Authority), with a
separation code of “JFF” and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code
of 3K.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2003-01689 in Executive Session on 2 September 2003, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Mr. Mike Novel, Member
Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 May 03.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 10 Jun 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 8 Jul 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Jul 03.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-01689
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 15 August 2002, she
was separated with an uncharacterized entry-level separation under the
provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 1.2 (Secretarial Authority) with a
separation code of "JFF" and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 3K.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03336
_________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 22 March 2000, he was separated under the provisions of AFR 36-3208, paragraph 1.2 (Secretarial Authority) with a separation code of JFF and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 3K. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Dec 02, w/atchs....
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03282
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, states the applicant while in basic training began experiencing right ankle and lower extremity pain which interfered with her training. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. HQ AFPC/DPPAE states the applicant received a reenlistment eligibility code of "2C," indicating the member was involuntarily separated with an honorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00406
Based on documentation in the file, they found the discharge consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states she knows there was no error or nothing in the form of an injustice, but still requests her records be corrected (Exhibit E). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00512
On 16 March 2004, he was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen (entry-level performance and conduct) and was issued an uncharacterized discharge. Therefore, we recommend that his records be corrected to the extent indicated below. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 16...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02947
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02947 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to one that would allow her to enlist in the Air National Guard. She served 3 months and 8 days on active duty and was issued an RE code of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00437
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00437 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2C” be changed to allow his enlistment into either the Army or Air Force. On 19 June 1998, he received an uncharacterized entry-level separation under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Fraudulent Entry into...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03000
She served 2 years, 2 months and 13 days of active service. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE stated that the Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” is correct. However, after reviewing the applicant’s records, the Board believes the narrative reason for separation and her current RE code are somewhat harsh.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02476
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02476 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: American Legion HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to delete Disability, Existed Prior to Service (EPTS). DPPD’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-03251
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03251 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) and separation codes be changed. On 26 March 2002, she failed to qualify on the M16 four times, scoring 12, 11, 14, and 17 respectively. MARILYN THOMAS Vice Chair AFBCMR BC-2003-03251 MEMORANDUM...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01155
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01155 COUNSEL: No HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His character of service, separation authority, separation code JFC, narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) 2C code be changed so that he may pursue a career in the military. The Air Force based this on the reported...