Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-03544
Original file (BC-2005-03544.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-03544
            INDEX CODE:  108.02, 110.02

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His record be changed to reflect he was disability discharged based on
all his current medical conditions and that  he  be  granted  original
service connection and  compensation  retroactive  from  his  date  of
discharge to include compensation for his dependents.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

A service connection compensation exam was not completed at  the  time
of his discharge for  the  following  issues:  Recurring  and  chronic
peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, irritable bowel syndrome  (IBS),  and
some type of anemia, pancreas, thyroid disorder, and  a  pre  diabetic
state.  He also claims he suffered from cellulitis while stationed  at
Upper Heyford Air Base in the UK, and a host of other  medical  issues
listed in his personal statement.

In support of his  appeal,  the  applicant  has  provided  a  personal
statement,  various  parts  of  his  service  medical  record   (SMR),
personnel records, Veteran’s Administration (VA) records  and  medical
records from civilian providers.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 14 February  1974.   He
was progressively promoted to the grade of staff sergeant (SSgt)  with
a date of rank (DOR) of 1 August 1981.  He voluntarily separated  from
the Air Force on his Expiration Term  of  Service  (ETS),  5  February
1987.  The evidence of record shows he performed his  military  duties
in an excellent  manner  during  his  12  year,  11 month  and  22–day
military career.  His separation medical examination conducted  on  16
October 1986 reported his health to be good and he was not taking  any
medications.  The  examination  documented  a  history  of  “Recurrent
mechanical back pain since 1978; no known injury, occurs occasionally;
Treated with physical therapy and  muscle  relaxants;  Good  results”;
“Elevated blood pressure on one occasion; 5  days  blood  checks  were
normal”; and “Frequent indigestion, secondary to ulcer,  treated  with
Tagamet, good results.”.  He was also diagnosed  with  high  frequency
hearing loss which did not interfere with duties  or  require  use  of
hearing aids.  He was  medically  cleared  for  continued  world  wide
service and separation.   Following  separation  he  has  developed  a
variety of non-service connected chronic medical problems for which he
is  seeking  Department  of  Veteran’s  Affairs  (DVA)  and   military
disability compensation.  The DVA has  granted  a  service  connection
combined rating of 30%.

The remaining pertinent medical facts are contained in the evaluation
prepared by the BCMR Medical Consultant at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The BCMR medical consultant states the evidence of record clearly show
there  were  no  medical  conditions  that  warranted   referral   for
disability evaluation while in the service including during  the  year
leading up to his voluntary separation.  He further states action  and
disposition  in  this  case  are  proper  and   equitable   reflecting
compliance with Air Force directives that implement the law.  He is of
the opinion no change in the records is warranted.

AFBCMR Medical Consultant’s complete response is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1
December 2006 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date,
no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the  basis
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  The AFBCMR Medical Consultant stated the evidence
of record reflects he performed his military duties  in  an  excellent
manner, and while his medical records indicate the presence of various
medical conditions for  which  he  sought  treatment,  none  warranted
referral for disability evaluation while in the service including  the
year leading up  to  his  voluntary  separation.   Therefore,  in  the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no  compelling  basis  to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2005-03544  in  Executive  Session  on  11  January  2006,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Laurence M. Groner, Panel Chair
      Mr. Todd L. Schafer, Member
      Ms. Maureen B. Higgins, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Nov 05, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B. Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated 1 Dec 06.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Dec 06.




                                   LAURENCE M. GRONER
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01220

    Original file (BC-2004-01220.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01220 INDEX CODE: 108.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 OCTOBER 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His disability discharge be changed to disability retirement, with a 100% compensable disability rating. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01143

    Original file (BC-2005-01143.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although changing the former member’s Air Force TDRL disability rating will not result in any additional monetary benefits for his heirs, the BCMR Medical Consultant opines that the preponderance of the evidence of the record warrants a higher TDRL disability rating than the 40 percent originally adjudicated and concludes that the evidence of the record most nearly approximates the 60 percent rating but notes that greater weight given to the relative contribution of the mood disorder and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00315

    Original file (BC-2007-00315.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB referred her case to the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB). He opines she likely did have somatoform disorder at the time prior to discharge. The complete BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In her response dated 30 Aug 07, the applicant states there were many physical symptoms she complained about in the military and she went to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03573

    Original file (BC-2003-03573.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03573 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: American Legion HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, duodenal ulcer, spinal disc condition, residuals of right and left foot injury, limited motion in cervical spine, varicose veins of right...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03487

    Original file (BC-2003-03487.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The IPEB recommended the applicant be discharged with severance pay with a disability rating of 20%; because of his unfitting, ratable, and compensable condition; in accordance with DoD and Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) guidelines. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the applicant’s records is warranted. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02769

    Original file (BC-2004-02769.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion no change in the records is warranted. Once the applicant separated from the Regular Air Force and was transferred to the Air Force Reserves, his status changed from being a member of the active Regular Air Force, to being a member of the Reserves, a civilian who could be called to active duty. 10 Section 1201, and his Reserve duty, did in fact, aggravate his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03142

    Original file (BC-2007-03142.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Board of Officers determined that his conditions existed prior to service (EPTS) ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial of relief, and concludes the applicant’s chronic pain or functional impairment currently involving his shoulders, back, or limbs, likely represents the expected natural progression of a degenerative process over time; or, as in the case of his shoulder pain, likely resulted from...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01531

    Original file (BC-2005-01531.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 December 1978, the MEB recommended he be forwarded to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that there is no evidence to support a higher disability rating at the time of the applicant’s separation. In deference to the comments of the BCMR Medical Consultant, which appear to be supported by the evidence of record, and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00417

    Original file (BC-2003-00417.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant states that the applicant was hospitalized for a bleeding peptic ulcer approximately one week after entering active duty. For purposes of disability administration, it is the date entered active duty and not the date of enlistment that is used to determine eligibility for disability compensation. However, other than his own assertions, he has provided no evidence that would...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04019

    Original file (BC-2002-04019.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The BCMR Consultant states that according to the applicant’s Air National Guard Point Summary, the applicant was not on active duty during his 1982 hospitalization. On 24 November 1982, the applicant underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) that concluded his depression was not incurred while entitled to basic pay and recommended medical disqualification and administrative discharge (not disability discharge). The applicant has not provided any evidence to show an injustice occurred at...