Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2005-02590-2
Original file (BC-2005-02590-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

ADDENDUM TO
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-02590
            INDEX CODE:  108.09

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her records be corrected to show  she  declined  coverage  for  the  Family
Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) and she be reimbursed  $330.00
for premiums she paid.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The Defense Finance and Accounting  Service  failed  to  provide  clear  and
accurate information on the FSGLI procedures  regarding  military  personnel
married to other military members.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit J.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force  on  11  January  1983,  was
progressively promoted to the grade of master sergeant and retired  in  that
grade on 1 August 2004.  A stipend overpayment in the  amount  of  $330  was
deducted from her pay in three increments of $100.00,  one  for  $20.00  and
another for $10.00.

On 8 March 2006, the applicant's request for reimbursement of $330.00  FSGLI
premiums was considered and denied by the Board. For an  accounting  of  the
facts and  circumstances  surrounding  the  applicant’s  request,  and,  the
rationale  of  the  earlier  decision  by  the  Board,  see  the  Record  of
Proceedings at Exhibit I.

On 17 April 2006, the applicant submitted  a  request  for  reconsideration.
To support her request, she provided a personal statement and  page  six  of
the DOD Financial Management Regulations Volume 7A, Chapter 47H, part of  an
in-processing briefing from Fort Huachuca, a  page  for  the  January  2006,
HQDA Army Family Action Plan Conference and an article from the  Navy  Legal
Service  Office  Southwest.   The  applicant's  complete  submission,   with
attachments, is at Exhibit J.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

Insufficient  relevant  evidence  has  been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or injustice.  After again reviewing this  application
and the evidence provided in support of her appeal,  we  remain  unpersuaded
that the applicant should be reimbursed for premiums paid in the  amount  of
$330.00.  We carefully considered the statements provided by  the  applicant
as well as the evidence of the record and find no error  or  injustice.  The
Board notes partial remarks from the applicant’s 1 November 2001, Leave  and
Earnings Statement,  show  that  she  was  notified  to  reduce  or  decline
spouse’s coverage by 31 December 2001 to receive a refund  of  any  premiums
paid and  there  is  no  indication  she  took  action  at  that  time.   As
previously noted the Air Force put together an aggressive campaign  to  make
members aware of the FSGLI program and their  benefits  and  fully  complied
with the law by providing information in advance of implementation  so  that
members could make an informed decision.    We  believe  the  applicant  was
provided ample time  to  decline  coverage  upon  the  start  of  the  FSGLI
advertisement  campaign.   Accordingly,  the  applicant’s  request  is   not
favorably considered.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the additional  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate  the  existence  of  material  error  or  injustice;  that   the
application  was  denied  without  a  personal  appearance;  and  that   the
application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of   newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 30 April 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
      Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
      Ms. Mary C. Puckett, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit I.  Record of Proceedings, dated 22 May 06,
                with exhibits A through H.
    Exhibit J.  Applicant's Letter, dated 17 Apr 06, w/atchs.




                                                   WAYNE R. GRACIE
                                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02590

    Original file (BC-2005-02590.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted excerpts from her November 2001 LES that stated “Family SGLI effective November 2001, reduce or decline spouse’s coverage by 31 December to receive a refund…” The applicant was provided ample time to decline coverage upon the start of the Air Force’s FSGLI advertisement campaign. She stated she was deployed in November 2001, but no orders were provided to support her case. According to DPFC the November 2001 statement clearly states to reduce or decline coverage by...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-06-03438

    Original file (BC-06-03438.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFC recommends the application be denied. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 Dec 06, for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00988

    Original file (BC-2008-00988.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPWC recommends denial of the applicant's request for reimbursement of FSGLI premiums from 1 Oct 06 through 31 Dec 07. The applicant did not report her marriage until Dec 07 (14 months later), and is, therefore, responsible for the FSGLI premiums for that period of time. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01671

    Original file (BC-2006-01671.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this respect, we note the applicant attempted to decline the FSGLI coverage in August 2005, therefore, a relief from back premiums for this period is warranted. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 1 September 2005, she executed an SGLV Form 8286A, Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) Election...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01913

    Original file (BC-2006-01913.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01913 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 DECEMBER 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed for premiums deducted from her pay for Family Servicemen’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI). If her service record needs to be corrected, it must be to enroll her active duty spouse under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02827

    Original file (BC-2004-02827.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She does not recall being informed of the requirement to decline FSGLI coverage for her spouse who was on active duty and already covered by his SGLI. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded the applicant should be reimbursed for the FSGLI premiums she paid from November 2001 to September 2003. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Nov 04.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01073

    Original file (BC-2006-01073.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPFC explains the law mandated that coverage for spouses (to include military-married-to- military couples (mil-to-mil)) and dependent children automatically go into effect on the date of implementation so long as the member was insured under the SGLI program. She notes the article does not specifically mention mil-to-mil, or that your active duty spouse is considered your dependent for this program, or that if an election is not made payments would automatically be deducted from your pay. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02078

    Original file (BC-2006-02078.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02078 INDEX CODE: 128.14 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 JAN 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he declined Family Member Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) coverage and he be reimbursed for FSGLI premiums he paid covering...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03186

    Original file (BC-2004-03186.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03186 INDEX CODE: 128.14 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to show she declined Family Member Servicemember’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) coverage and she be reimbursed for FSGLI premiums she paid from 1 November 2001 through 30...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02922

    Original file (BC-2006-02922.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s LES dated for the month of August 2006, indicates a total debt of $481 for FSGLI premiums from 1 November 2001 through 30 August 2006. DPFC states that the Air Force took adequate steps as directed to inform all members of this new program and that the member had adequate time between 1 November and 31 December 2001 to make an election decision. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Oct 06, a copy...