Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01671
Original file (BC-2006-01671.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  2006-01671
            INDEX CODE: 128.14
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  5 DECEMBER 2007

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

She be reimbursed for the full amount of Family Servicemember’s  Group  Life
Insurance (FSGLI).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

In September 2005, FSGLI premiums began being deducted from  her  pay.   She
was never told she had to decline the FSGLI or knew there were two types  of
insurance.  She went to the records section to  decline  her  SGLI  and  was
advised she was only being charged SGLI premiums.   When  she  reviewed  her
May 2006 Leave and Earnings Statement (LES), she noticed  her pay was  being
deducted by $50 since October 2005.  As of 18 May  2006,  she  declined  the
FSGLI; however, she feels the debt is an injustice.

In support of her request, the applicant provided copies of  her  LES's  for
the periods August 2005 through October 2005 and April 2006.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is a member of the Regular Air Force who is currently  serving
in the grade of technical sergeant (E-6).

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPFC recommends a partial grant.   DPFC  states  that  it  appears  the
applicant attempted in good faith to decline the FSGLI  coverage  in  August
2005, therefore, reimbursement of premiums from  September  2005  until  May
2006 is recommended.  However,  DPFC  does  not  recommend  relief  of  back
premiums for the  period  November  2001  through  August  2005.   The  DPFC
complete evaluation, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  14
July 2006 for review and response within 30 days.  As  of  this  date,  this
office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Sufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of an injustice warranting partial  relief  for  reimbursement  of
Family Servicemember's Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) payments from  September
2005 to May 2006.  In this respect,  we  note  the  applicant  attempted  to
decline the FSGLI coverage in August 2005, therefore,  a  relief  from  back
premiums for this period is warranted.  However, we do  not  believe  relief
of back premiums from November 2001  through  August  2005  is  appropriate.
Applicant's  contentions  were  noted;  however,  we   believe   Air   Force
authorities made every reasonable effort to  inform  the  applicant  of  the
requirements set forth in Public Law 107-14 and agree with the  opinion  and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility that  total
reimbursement  of  her  FSGLI  premiums  back  to  November  2001   is   not
appropriate.  Accordingly, we recommend the  records  be  corrected  to  the
extent indicated below.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air  Force  relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 1 September  2005,  she  executed
an SGLV Form 8286A, Family  Servicemembers’  Group  Life  Insurance  (FSGLI)
Election Certificate, declining any and all coverage, effective 1  September
2005.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2006-01671
in Executive Session on 22 August 2006, under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

           Mr. Robert H. Altman, Panel Chair
           Mr. Wallace F. Beard, Jr, Member
           Ms. Karen A. Holloman, Member

All members voted to correct  the  record  as  recommended.   The  following
documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number 2006-01671 was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 18 May 06, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPFC, dated 30 Jun 06, w/atchs.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Jul 06.





                 ROBERT H. ALTMAN
                 Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02922

    Original file (BC-2006-02922.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s LES dated for the month of August 2006, indicates a total debt of $481 for FSGLI premiums from 1 November 2001 through 30 August 2006. DPFC states that the Air Force took adequate steps as directed to inform all members of this new program and that the member had adequate time between 1 November and 31 December 2001 to make an election decision. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Oct 06, a copy...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02922

    Original file (BC-2006-02922.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s LES dated for the month of August 2006, indicates a total debt of $481 for FSGLI premiums from 1 November 2001 through 30 August 2006. DPFC states that the Air Force took adequate steps as directed to inform all members of this new program and that the member had adequate time between 1 November and 31 December 2001 to make an election decision. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Oct 06, a copy...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01073

    Original file (BC-2006-01073.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DPFC explains the law mandated that coverage for spouses (to include military-married-to- military couples (mil-to-mil)) and dependent children automatically go into effect on the date of implementation so long as the member was insured under the SGLI program. She notes the article does not specifically mention mil-to-mil, or that your active duty spouse is considered your dependent for this program, or that if an election is not made payments would automatically be deducted from your pay. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03487

    Original file (BC-2005-03487.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this respect, we note that Public Law 107-14 established the FSGLI program that was implemented on 1 November 2001, making it possible for servicemembers to provide up to $100,000 coverage for their spouse and $10,000 coverage for their dependent children through the Office of Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance. On 19 May 2005, she again declined FSGLI coverage and has been refunded the premiums from June 2005 through October 2005. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02590

    Original file (BC-2005-02590.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant submitted excerpts from her November 2001 LES that stated “Family SGLI effective November 2001, reduce or decline spouse’s coverage by 31 December to receive a refund…” The applicant was provided ample time to decline coverage upon the start of the Air Force’s FSGLI advertisement campaign. She stated she was deployed in November 2001, but no orders were provided to support her case. According to DPFC the November 2001 statement clearly states to reduce or decline coverage by...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01913

    Original file (BC-2006-01913.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01913 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 DECEMBER 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed for premiums deducted from her pay for Family Servicemen’s Group Life Insurance (FSGLI). If her service record needs to be corrected, it must be to enroll her active duty spouse under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-06-03438

    Original file (BC-06-03438.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFC recommends the application be denied. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 Dec 06, for review and comment within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02611

    Original file (BC-2005-02611.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. On 9 August 2005, the applicant completed an SGLV Form 8286A, Family Coverage Election, declining coverage. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFC recommended denial indicating Air Force leadership took adequate steps to inform all members of this new program and the applicant had adequate time to make an election decision.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01324

    Original file (BC-2006-01324.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01324 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 05 SEPTEMBER 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed the Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) premiums deducted from his pay from 1 November 2001 through 31 October 2005. In addition, the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00964

    Original file (BC-2006-00964.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the member declined coverage. Applicant claims that DEERS personnel explained that FSGLI applies only to service members with dependents and not to active duty military members with an active duty spouse who are already covered under SGLI. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...