RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03219
INDEX CODE: 110.02
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: No
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 Apr 08
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry code be changed from 4L to a code that would allow him to
continue his career in the US Air Force.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He would like to continue his career in the Air Force, which would require
an eligible reentry/reenlistment code. While he was disenrolled from the
U.S. Air Force Academy, he does not feel that his prior character of
service warrants the termination of his military career.
In support of his request, applicant provided a DD Form 149,
DD Form 214, DD Form 785, DD Form 2366, and personnel data information.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 28 Mar 06, the applicant was ordered to active duty to serve out a two-
year active duty service commitment (ADSC) associated with disenrollment
from the USAF Academy. The applicant entered the USAF Academy on 27 Jun
02. On 5 Dec 05, the applicant was disenrolled from the USAF Academy and
honorably discharged for violating the Cadet Wing Honor Code by cheating on
a Geography 310 Lab. The applicant turned in as his own work a
substantially similar version of the Geography assignment from a fellow
cadet. Prior to this incident, the applicant was on the Dean’s honor list
and Athletics honor list. The applicant was transferred to the AF Reserves
in an enlisted status contingent upon his acceptance and completion of an
AFROTC Program. On or about
30 Jan 06, the applicant was denied admittance by HQ ROTC and is now
serving out his two-year ADSC on active duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ USAFA/DPQ does not make a clear cut recommendation in this case.
However, they note that the applicant’s contention he was given a “4L”
reenlistment (RE) code due to his pattern of misconduct is incorrect. DPQ
points out that all cadets disenrolled from the Academy are given a “4L” RE
code. On 18 Feb 04, an Under Secretary of Defense memo directed that
Cadets and Midshipmen who eliminate from a service academy receive an RE
code. Cadets who disenroll from the Air Force Academy for any reason
receive a “4L” RE code, “Separated Commissioning Program Eliminee.”
The complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9 Nov
06 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has
received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. Based on information provided by the Air
Force office of primary responsibility, it appears the RE code given the
applicant is correct and that the applicant has not been treated any
differently than any other similarly situated cadet disenrolled from the
Academy. Additionally, the Board also concluded the USAF Academy Cadet
Sanctions Recommendation Panel made a fully qualified decision regarding
the applicant’s USAF Academy Honor Code violations. Therefore, in the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. [Examiner’s
Note: After discussing the applicant’s case with AFPC/DPPAES (Accessions),
we recommend the applicant contact them to obtain guidance related to
possible options regarding the continuation of his Air Force career.]
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issue involved. Therefore,
the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2006-
03219 in Executive Session on 13 Dec 06, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. James W. Russell III, Panel Chair
Mr. Wallace F. Beard, Jr., Member
Ms. Barbara R. Murray, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Oct 06.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ USAFA/DPQ, dated 19 Oct 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Nov 06.
JAMES W. RUSSELL III
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03219
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03219 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 Apr 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code be changed from 4L to a code that would allow him to continue his career in the US Air Force. Additionally, the Board also concluded the USAF Academy Cadet Sanctions...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00900
On 15 October 2003, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-2020 for a pattern of misconduct with an RE code of “4L” which denotes “Separated Commissioning Program Eliminee.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 10 AMDS/CC recommends the requested relief be denied. All cadets disenrolling from Air Force Academy are given this RE code. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01492
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01492 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAFA/A1A recommends denying the applicants request to change his RE code. The applicants attorney states the applicant did not have the right to counsel at his...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01674
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01674 INDEX CODE: 104.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 Dec 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The DD Form 785, Record of Disenrollment From Officer Candidate-Type Training, dated 29 Jun 05, be amended by changing the words in Section III to reflect “Cadet P voluntarily resigned while...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02457
The Superintendent, the disenrollment authority, agreed with the CSRP and disenrolled the applicant, ordered him to reimburse the government for the costs of his Academy education by serving three years active duty in an enlisted capacity, but also granted him an educational delay to seek a commissioning source other than the Academy. As noted above, the Superintendent determined that the applicant should reimburse the government for the costs of the Academy education by serving in an...
On 29 Sep 98, the Secretary of the Air Force approved the recommendation of the United States Air Force Academy Superintendent to disenroll applicant and directed that he be honorably separated from cadet status, transferred to the Air Force Reserve and ordered to active duty for a period of three years. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Staff Judge Advocate, HQ USAFA/JA, stated that the applicant was disenrolled from the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03928
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03928 INDEX CODE: 104.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His debt for the cost of his United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) education be waived. On 15 Mar 01, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification and elected not to waive his right to present his case before a Board of...
It is the opinion of USAFA/JA that the Cadet Medical Evaluation Board (CMEB) recommendation for applicant's medical discharge was properly processed and, based upon the medical opinions provided, resulted in an appropriate decision by the Secretary to medically discharge the applicant. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we are persuaded that applicant's involuntary - disenrollment from the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) should be changed to a voluntary resignation...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04030
In this case, although the applicant argued this was a “Self-Report”, the voting members of the CSRP, based on the evidence presented to them, determined the case was an “Admit”, and there is sufficient evidence in the file to support their findings and recommendations. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice to warrant changing the applicant’s USAFA Cadet Wing Honor Code violation to “Self-Report.” After a thorough review...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01915
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01915 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO CONGRESSIONAL INTEREST: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4L (separated commissioning program) be changed to RE-12 (recommended for reenlistment). Examiners Note: Code RE-12 is not an Air Force reenlistment eligibility code. ...