RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02941
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Mar 31, 2008
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His character of service be upgraded to honorable and his re-enlistment
code be upgraded from 2B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The applicant states current annotations do not reflect justice of his
service.
The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant entered active duty as an Intelligence Applications
Specialist (AFSC 1N0X1) on 25 Jul 02 and served for a period of 3 years, 1
month, and 7 days.
A resume of his Airman Performance Reports (APRS) follows:
Closeout Date Overall Rating
24 Mar 04 2 (initial and referral)
24 Mar 05 1 (annual and referral)
The applicant’s prior service was with the South Carolina Air National
Guard from 26 Jul 95 to 1 Mar 96 and from 5 Jun 00 to 30 Sep 00. The
applicant’s job specialty was Intelligence Applications Specialist (AFSC
1N0X1). No performance reports are available.
The applicant was discharged for failure to progress in on-the-job
training. After being trained on several items, the applicant could not
complete his assignments. Because of the problems the applicant had in
performing his tasks after being certified, he was later decertified and
removed from training for failure to progress. Additionally, the applicant
had numerous infractions for failure to complete tasks, unacceptable
comprehension and retention of training, taking extended lunch hours,
failure to obey lawful orders, dereliction of duty, failure to maintain
standards of government quarters, and failure of dorm room inspection.
The applicant was discharged on 1 Sep 05 with an under honorable conditions
(general) discharge for unsatisfactory performance. His reenlistment code
was 2B (separated with a general or under other than honorable conditions
discharge) which made him ineligible to reenlist and not authorized to
extend his enlistment.
_____________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. Based on the documentation on file in the
master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural
and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The discharge
was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant did
not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred
in the discharge processing. He provided no facts warranting an upgrade of
his under honorable conditions (general) discharge or his reenlistment
eligibility code.
The HQ AFPC/DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_____________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13 Oct
06 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has
received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After careful consideration of the
applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we have seen no
evidence indicating that the former member was improperly discharged or
that an upgrade of his service characterization and reenlistment code are
warranted. Accordingly, the applicant’s request is not favorably
considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2006-02941
in Executive Session on 21 Nov 06, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael J. Novel, Panel Chair
Ms. Patricia A. Collins, Member
Ms. Teri G. Spoutz, Member
The following documentary evidence pertaining to Docket Number BC-2006-
02941 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Sep 06.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 3 Oct 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Oct 06.
MICHAEL J. NOVEL
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01677
The Board noted that the Air Force Separations Branch was unable to determine the propriety of the separation. Nevertheless, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force Reenlistments office that the applicant’s request should be granted based on the governing directive in effect at the time of his separation. Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02887
Based on the circumstances of his discharge, they found no evidence or injustice; therefore, applicant’s RE code is correct. HQ AFPC/DPPAE’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 9 Nov 06 for review and comment within 30 days. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02661
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant entered active duty in the Air Force on 29 Nov 74. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2006-02661 in Executive Session on 21 Nov 06, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Michael J. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Oct 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00754
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00754 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 SEP 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow him reenter military service. Furthermore, the discharge notification letter the applicant received stated “If you are...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00509
DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Mar 06 for review and comment within 30 days and on 17 Apr 2006, he was forwarded a copy of the FBI report. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member Mr. John E. B. Smith, Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Feb...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02690
Applicant acknowledged receipt and, after consulting counsel, submitted statements for the discharge authority’s review on 27 January 2005; however, the discharge authority directed her separation for unsatisfactory performance (failure to progress in on-the- job training) with an honorable characterization of service and applicant was subsequently separated on 11 February 2005. On 21 June 2005, the BCMR, via a Board majority vote, directed her records be changed to show an RE code of “3K”...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02714
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02714 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Mar 11, 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The applicant submitted two applications. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. After careful consideration of the applicant’s request and...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02854
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02854 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Mar 24, 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02072
On 11 Oct 73, an evaluation officer interviewed the applicant and recommended he be discharged with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge for unsuitability based upon a defective attitude. ____________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied, and states, in part, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00796
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00796 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 Sep 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to one that allows reenlistment. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the...